tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post66834424923766054..comments2024-03-28T06:04:08.593-04:00Comments on Mami's Shit: Truth Jihad radio with Kevin Barrett 2016.06.22Mamihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13298385482303078866noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post-32752357146029072112016-06-23T21:26:18.561-04:002016-06-23T21:26:18.561-04:00Correction: the WIN-LOSE dialectic of the parasite...Correction: the WIN-LOSE dialectic of the parasiteNegentropichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17104407003718477087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post-62835084491979365962016-06-23T21:25:32.710-04:002016-06-23T21:25:32.710-04:00Equating democracy with any form of "freedom&...Equating democracy with any form of "freedom" or Natural Rights (which have to be fiercely defended to be brought into existence) is a total fraud and the wedge by means of which the win-dialectic of the parasite installs itself within the win-win dialectic of all creative and productive people in basically all see-will-I-zations (only when you can see more than a certain degree of your freewill in action do you even have a civilization, ripe for plunder by parasites or not). <br /><br />Someone should force this limited-hangout obfuscator Barrett and that equally vague "senator" to answer the question: <br /><br />What's so good about "democracy"? What's so "great" about the dictatorship of the retarded opinions of the lowest-common-denomintor majority, who moreover more-often-than-not are led by the nose by a fully-controlled Media? <br /><br />And what makes the opinions of ONE often-quite-knowledgeable-&-competent leader, as long as he is forced to respect the Natural Rights of all individuals in his extended family, so bad or so much "worse" than the opinions of a pack of rabble? <br /><br />And, in case of encroaching tyranny, isn't it harder to depose the deep-rooted opinions and physical actions of an entire mob of irrational tyrants than only ONE leader and his few helpers? <br /><br />Last but not least: Isn't it better to NEVER have this fraud of "democracy" decide anything ever again unless ALL OF THE PARTIES to the act agree? Why force anyone to give in to the group if he's not initiating force or fraud and violating anybody else's freedom of choice? So in that sense, who even needs a "democratic Republic" or democratic anything?<br /><br />"Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- Henry Louis Mencken <br /><br />"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." "No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." -- Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816<br />Negentropichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17104407003718477087noreply@blogger.com