tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post8317031299556646684..comments2024-03-28T06:04:08.593-04:00Comments on Mami's Shit: Spingola Speaks 2014.01.22Mamihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13298385482303078866noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post-38238985414159259802014-01-23T17:13:42.837-05:002014-01-23T17:13:42.837-05:00When you take sides by personality instead of issu...When you take sides by personality instead of issues, you fall prey to being a "useful idiot" to a tyrant whom you hold in high esteem.<br /><br />So, instead of focusing on the personality of the caller, the guest, or me, take a moment to consider the questions themselves. <br /><br />What is Joe's relationship with Kapner? Is that not a legitimate question? If you think not, then I can't help you since Joe mentioned "jews" several times and it is commonly aired that Kapner is a jew.<br /><br />To anyone not predisposed to discount any tough question to Joe, that issue deserves an explanation.<br /><br />Also, since Joe made favorable mention of Gibson in such a way as to leave us with the impression that Gibson is somebody to be honored and admired, then it is also legitimate to question the claim about evading the draft. <br /><br />If you don't think so, then you simply are of a mind to disregard any untoward questions asked about<br />someone you have already decided is a hero. Whatever "dirt" is uncovered about someone you have already decided to admire, you will just ignore and adopt a harsh attitude toward the party uncovering the dirt.<br /><br />The problem I have with Deanna is that she should have at least asked Joe to address the issues (raised by Rick, admittedly in a rude fashion), and not allow Joe to pull that jewish trick of attacking the QUESTIONER so as to avoid having to address the QUESTION.<br /><br />Use your sense of logic - this is not a personality contest, but a quest for TRUTH, which cannot be arrived at by clever avoidance of any difficult question.<br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03344344494198177341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post-64004702479299796732014-01-23T13:18:32.950-05:002014-01-23T13:18:32.950-05:00No i second Joe Cortinas answer.And i do not lower...No i second Joe Cortinas answer.And i do not lower myself either as Joe said to give you an explanation why.So if you have to say good riddance to Deanna..What happens if a bike is fallen in China?Christianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16179471018480741497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440450620561193447.post-31140405447556822972014-01-22T19:10:07.646-05:002014-01-22T19:10:07.646-05:00Softball????
At 52:30 a caller (identified as &qu...Softball????<br /><br />At 52:30 a caller (identified as "Rick") asked two questions, in an accosting manner, which deserve a serious answer. 1) What is Joe's relationship with Nathanial Kapner? and 2) What about the claim that the Mel Gibson's family evaded the draft?<br /><br />Instead of answering the questions straight away, Joe feigned disdain for the caller, which he labeled a troll, and proclaimed he wouldn't even discuss it "with him". <br /><br />That is such a typical JEWISH tactic, when asked a tough question, attack the questioner so as to avoid having to address the question. <br /><br />And, to top it off, our normally hard-hitting Deanna chimed in like a pussy and let Joe off the hook without a whimper, joining in with Joe's disdain about the caller and not giving a straight answer to the questions. She retorted, in a cheap show of haughty humor, "Goodbye, Rick". <br /><br />Goodbye, Deanna.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03344344494198177341noreply@blogger.com