December 14, 2012

Chosenite Philosophy

"Favored Races"

The original title of Darwin's book was "On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."

Note: Shortened to The Origin of Species in 1872

 The human race has evolved to its present state of intelligence and power because of "the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life." "Race" is the central mechanism of evolution that has created all living things. "The preservation of favored races" is a simple process to understand, but its effects over time are awesome. If we examine the process, we find that at some stage in evolution we can observe a group of individuals of a single species which exists in an area segregated from other members of that same species. As a result of chance mutation, there occur genetic variations in some members of that segregated group. As the generations continue to reproduce, these genetic variations accumulate in the progeny of that segregate group. At first, the accumulated genetic variations do not make the segregate group different enough from the original species to justify calling the segregated group a new species or even a new "favored race" of the original species. However, after many generations, the segregated group or tribe which had accumulated sufficient genetic differences would be called a new "race" of the original species. Over time, these newly developed segregated races continue to accumulate genetic differences through chance mutation, variation, etc. The "favored" variations increase the survivability of the "race" which carries them. Once this new "favored race" has become different enough from the original species, it is called a new species. Hence the subtitle, "On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."There is really no probability that the "races" would be equal. In fact, the whole notion runs counter to all evolutionary theory and to the whole science of biology.

Given the laws of biology, it would be a great surprise if the average strength or intelligence of one "race" was found to be exactly equal to the average strength or intelligence of a different "race". Despite the controversy surrounding "race", it is not particularly useful to know which "race" happens, as a result of an accident of evolutionary development, to have greater average strength or greater average intelligence because one could not predict from this average that any particular individual member of one "race" was going to be superior or inferior to any particular individual member of a different "race". There are superior and inferior, strong and weak, intelligent and intelligent individuals in all "races". Regardless of "racial" averages, one would still have to judge each individual on the basis of individual merit without reference to the average of the group to which he happened to belong. Only by judging people as individuals, could we avoid injustice and enable all people to make the maximum contribution to society. There is not such thing as a superior "race" per se, in the sense that every member of one "race" is superior to every member of another "race". Neither is there such a thing as "racial" equality in the sense that the average strength or intelligence of one "race" is equal to the average strength or intelligence of every other "race". By judging people as individuals, one could perhaps identify a (superior) socio-biological class which might be a cross section of all "races" although probably not in equal proportion. The only way you could have a (superior race) would be if a "favored race" evolved into and became the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens, in which case it would become a superior species. Eugenics is a moral commitment not a racial affiliation and any "race" that adopted a eugenic program could, given sufficient time, evolve into and become the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens. It is our hope that all "races" will accept that moral responsibility and accomplish that objective, but it can not be accomplished within the political, philosophical and religious milieu of the 20th century.  Source

Charles Darwinewicz.

9 comments:

  1. Atheism is just another form of insane religious fanaticism.

    Richard Dawkins was on Radio 4's Today programme February 14, 2012 with Rev Giles Fraser to talk about a survey suggesting around two thirds of Christians don't know the title of the first book of the New Testament. But when challenged by Fraser, Dawkins couldn't recall the full title of Origin of Species.

    Fraser: Richard, if I said to you what is the full title of The Origin Of Species, I'm sure you could tell me that.

    Dawkins: Yes I could.

    Fraser: Go on then.

    Dawkins: On the Origin of Species...Uh...With, oh, God, On the Origin of Species. There is a sub-title with respect to the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.

    (Oh, dear me! Richard, what did you just say? God? God on the origin of species and the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life? That wouldn't be the Chosenite God you are calling on now for an answer, now would it?)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder how Dawkins reconciles his darwinism with his pc libtard views.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Atheism is simply not subsribing to a religion.

    People always bring up Dawkins or Hitchens as being some kind of ''messiah'' of atheism.They might be correct in their views on religion but on other subjects the're certainly unsceptical and adhere to obvious faitytales.9/11 and WWII history comes to mind.

    I'm more of an atheist in the line of a fellow that goes by the name of ZionCrimeFactory.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Dawkins' mother* is (was?) said to be Jewish. This article has been cited in support but it is in fact silent apart from the name which is not conclusive:

    http://www.biographybase.com/biography/Dawkins_Richard.html


    * "His mother was Jean Mary Vyvyan Dawkins (nee Ladner)."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jews are against Eugenics and Darwinism:
    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/chap2.pdf
    Eugenics is the antithesis to the modern "we are all one" / multicult bullshit. We should encourage people with good genes to procreate.

    Dawkins vs Rabbi
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UifxeFy2qIY

    ReplyDelete
  6. "We should encourage people with good genes to procreate."

    Damn right! Fuckin' is good for you, Jack. Gettin' some pussy beats having a war.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Shit, it is gone. By chance did anyone here grab the chosenite video? Thanks in advance if you can post a download link.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here is a mirror on blib not jewtube from a german fellow.
    http://mcexcorcism.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/the-chosenites-rt-a-must-see-event-englisch/

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.