Whatever the actual motive of Fuentes (here's the reality) Fuentes (or whoever instructs Fuentes on his positions) is correct. It's entirely possible the bullet fragmented and tore through Kirk internally. The autopsy and forensics will substantiate this. It's the single bullet theory; tumbling bullets are kryptonite to people who feed into nonsense to support fantastical positions with these broad claims such as 'it's impossible (it's ballistic forensics) - not impossible. And Fuentes makes the obvious logical point; why would the plotters not use the same caliber as their fall guy? That makes zero logic whatsoever. Its been over 60 years and people have shifted to the bullet that hit JFK in the back didn't fully penetrate his back This idiocy is essential to disqualify the SBT (a tumbling bullet theory) If you objectively look into matters you'll notice there is no cohesive alternative to the SBT put forth in decades (not one) And due to the forensic ballistics,, medical autopsy in order to entertain one, all the evidence is alluded to as being faked. This is not the hill to argue and die on before the actual forensic details are released with Kirk. Fuentes or whoever guides him in strategy is smart enough to realize this. Ian Carrol is a moron (that's pretty obvious) Six months from now Fuentes will be more than relevant while Owens & Carrol are made to look like fools once the trap is sprung over these 30-06 impossible bullet claims.
You have never shot a 30.06, obviously. I have killed many deer and never has a bullet not left the body. I shot deer in the neck 5 years ago (he was running). Exit hole was massive. It ruined the mount. More importantly, anyone who believes the official narrative is a moron.
My first impression of Fuentes was a feeling of revulsion... gotta trust your gut instinct. What concerns me is why he is so popular with his generation, that's a problem.
Why is Ian Carrol calling that French Canadian loon a 'neurosurgeon' when 10 years ago he was a grifting microbiologist taking handouts off Jeffery Epstein?
Yeah its like they insert the most problematic facts,( gun, shooter, bullet) and the majority accept it and its supposed to create controversy and unprovable conspiracy discussion for years for "conspiratards" ( Thats the name for non positive and non "America is on the upswing", you know," black pilled doomers". Am i right Scorp? LOL!!! Put a trap door into the narrative as they did. Cement over the site, perfect! These are pissed on bread crumbs inserted by intelligence. No?
What's moronic is to start clinging to incohesive theories & vendettas in regards to the mechanics of a shooting/murder based upon nothing but armature second hand video analysis and nothing else. Playing gun expert on the internet offers too much of a dopamine rush for most.
Not sure what your point is. To gamble your upward momentum on claims based on footage before any findings are made available (actual forensics) would be an idiot move for Fuentes. Now Trump's ear bullshit, Fuentes bought into that on face. Not sure what his actual motivation in the scheme of everything actually is to be honest, but Fuentes going full 'grassy knoll' conspiratard over it would have been a pointless move. Glad he didn't actually.
I'd hope you were always being honest "crawler6" LOL I'm not sure why actions or "decisions made by Fuentes" can make you feel glad. BTW, "crawler6", on Trump's ear bullshit, did you buy into that on face?
Fuck Kirk and fuck that whore who is out whoring off his death. I wanted to post this yesterday but I read Stop in The Name of God and wanted to honor the sabbath like Charlie.
Hey RJ , sounds like you're on to Nicky F now eh? LOL Better late than never! Cheers!
ReplyDeletehttps://grizzom.blogspot.com/2025/08/nick-fuentes-exposes-origins-of.html
RJew wouldn’t know the truth even if it smacked him the face.
DeleteThis is a the site, where everyone gets to be called a Jew, at on point or another! LOL
ReplyDeleteI am jew. I am in prison.
ReplyDeleteI'm a real jew. A white Hebrew Israelite.
ReplyDeleteWhatever the actual motive of Fuentes (here's the reality) Fuentes (or whoever instructs Fuentes on his positions) is correct. It's entirely possible the bullet fragmented and tore through Kirk internally. The autopsy and forensics will substantiate this. It's the single bullet theory; tumbling bullets are kryptonite to people who feed into nonsense to support fantastical positions with these broad claims such as 'it's impossible (it's ballistic forensics) - not impossible. And Fuentes makes the obvious logical point; why would the plotters not use the same caliber as their fall guy? That makes zero logic whatsoever. Its been over 60 years and people have shifted to the bullet that hit JFK in the back didn't fully penetrate his back This idiocy is essential to disqualify the SBT (a tumbling bullet theory) If you objectively look into matters you'll notice there is no cohesive alternative to the SBT put forth in decades (not one) And due to the forensic ballistics,, medical autopsy in order to entertain one, all the evidence is alluded to as being faked. This is not the hill to argue and die on before the actual forensic details are released with Kirk. Fuentes or whoever guides him in strategy is smart enough to realize this. Ian Carrol is a moron (that's pretty obvious) Six months from now Fuentes will be more than relevant while Owens & Carrol are made to look like fools once the trap is sprung over these 30-06 impossible bullet claims.
ReplyDeleteI'm not even sure there was a bullet, but these kinds of debates about the "science" , legitimize the the narrative.
DeleteYou have never shot a 30.06, obviously. I have killed many deer and never has a bullet not left the body. I shot deer in the neck 5 years ago (he was running). Exit hole was massive. It ruined the mount.
DeleteMore importantly, anyone who believes the official narrative is a moron.
My first impression of Fuentes was a feeling of revulsion... gotta trust your gut instinct. What concerns me is why he is so popular with his generation, that's a problem.
ReplyDeleteMs Rachel THREATENED
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9E5YGVPASo&t=295s
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhy is Ian Carrol calling that
ReplyDeleteFrench Canadian loon a 'neurosurgeon' when 10 years ago he was a grifting microbiologist taking handouts off Jeffery Epstein?
I deer hunt with a 30.06 and have shot hundreds of rounds. Absolutely zero chance that he was hit with a 30.06.
ReplyDeletePeriod.
Thank you.
(PS: I am not convinced the guy is even dead)
Bmans absolutely correct. Anyone that's saying Kirk was hit by a 30-06 is either ignorant or a $7,000 clubber. It's as simple as that. Cheers
DeleteYeah its like they insert the most problematic facts,( gun, shooter, bullet) and the majority accept it and its supposed to create controversy and unprovable conspiracy discussion for years for "conspiratards" ( Thats the name for non positive and non "America is on the upswing", you know," black pilled doomers". Am i right Scorp? LOL!!! Put a trap door into the narrative as they did. Cement over the site, perfect! These are pissed on bread crumbs inserted by intelligence. No?
DeleteWhat's moronic is to start clinging to incohesive theories & vendettas in regards to the mechanics of a shooting/murder based upon nothing but armature second hand video analysis and nothing else. Playing gun expert on the internet offers too much of a dopamine rush for most.
ReplyDelete"Whatever the actual motive of Fuentes (here's the reality) "LOL thanks i feel much more grounded now
DeleteNo chance of a cohesive theory forming under these circumstances you know with the vendettas and all...LOL
(here's the reality) Best move along, nothing to see here folks LOL
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuAKnbIr6TE
Not sure what your point is. To gamble your upward momentum on claims based on footage before any findings are made available (actual forensics) would be an idiot move for Fuentes. Now Trump's ear bullshit, Fuentes bought into that on face. Not sure what his actual motivation in the scheme of everything actually is to be honest, but Fuentes going full 'grassy knoll' conspiratard over it would have been a pointless move. Glad he didn't actually.
ReplyDeleteI'd hope you were always being honest "crawler6" LOL I'm not sure why actions or "decisions made by Fuentes" can make you feel glad. BTW, "crawler6", on Trump's ear bullshit, did you buy into that on face?
DeleteFuck Kirk and fuck that whore who is out whoring off his death. I wanted to post this yesterday but I read Stop in The Name of God and wanted to honor the sabbath like Charlie.
ReplyDelete