Whatever the actual motive of Fuentes (here's the reality) Fuentes (or whoever instructs Fuentes on his positions) is correct. It's entirely possible the bullet fragmented and tore through Kirk internally. The autopsy and forensics will substantiate this. It's the single bullet theory; tumbling bullets are kryptonite to people who feed into nonsense to support fantastical positions with these broad claims such as 'it's impossible (it's ballistic forensics) - not impossible. And Fuentes makes the obvious logical point; why would the plotters not use the same caliber as their fall guy? That makes zero logic whatsoever. Its been over 60 years and people have shifted to the bullet that hit JFK in the back didn't fully penetrate his back This idiocy is essential to disqualify the SBT (a tumbling bullet theory) If you objectively look into matters you'll notice there is no cohesive alternative to the SBT put forth in decades (not one) And due to the forensic ballistics,, medical autopsy in order to entertain one, all the evidence is alluded to as being faked. This is not the hill to argue and die on before the actual forensic details are released with Kirk. Fuentes or whoever guides him in strategy is smart enough to realize this. Ian Carrol is a moron (that's pretty obvious) Six months from now Fuentes will be more than relevant while Owens & Carrol are made to look like fools once the trap is sprung over these 30-06 impossible bullet claims.
My first impression of Fuentes was a feeling of revulsion... gotta trust your gut instinct. What concerns me is why he is so popular with his generation, that's a problem.
Why is Ian Carrol calling that French Canadian loon a 'neurosurgeon' when 10 years ago he was a grifting microbiologist taking handouts off Jeffery Epstein?
Yeah its like they insert the most problematic facts,( gun, shooter, bullet) and the majority accept it and its supposed to create controversy and unprovable conspiracy discussion for years for "conspiratards" ( Thats the name for non positive and non "America is on the upswing", you know," black pilled doomers". Am i right Scorp? LOL!!! Put a trap door into the narrative as they did. Cement over the site, perfect! These are pissed on bread crumbs inserted by intelligence. No?
14 comments:
Hey RJ , sounds like you're on to Nicky F now eh? LOL Better late than never! Cheers!
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2025/08/nick-fuentes-exposes-origins-of.html
RJew wouldn’t know the truth even if it smacked him the face.
This is a the site, where everyone gets to be called a Jew, at on point or another! LOL
I am jew. I am in prison.
I'm a real jew. A white Hebrew Israelite.
Whatever the actual motive of Fuentes (here's the reality) Fuentes (or whoever instructs Fuentes on his positions) is correct. It's entirely possible the bullet fragmented and tore through Kirk internally. The autopsy and forensics will substantiate this. It's the single bullet theory; tumbling bullets are kryptonite to people who feed into nonsense to support fantastical positions with these broad claims such as 'it's impossible (it's ballistic forensics) - not impossible. And Fuentes makes the obvious logical point; why would the plotters not use the same caliber as their fall guy? That makes zero logic whatsoever. Its been over 60 years and people have shifted to the bullet that hit JFK in the back didn't fully penetrate his back This idiocy is essential to disqualify the SBT (a tumbling bullet theory) If you objectively look into matters you'll notice there is no cohesive alternative to the SBT put forth in decades (not one) And due to the forensic ballistics,, medical autopsy in order to entertain one, all the evidence is alluded to as being faked. This is not the hill to argue and die on before the actual forensic details are released with Kirk. Fuentes or whoever guides him in strategy is smart enough to realize this. Ian Carrol is a moron (that's pretty obvious) Six months from now Fuentes will be more than relevant while Owens & Carrol are made to look like fools once the trap is sprung over these 30-06 impossible bullet claims.
My first impression of Fuentes was a feeling of revulsion... gotta trust your gut instinct. What concerns me is why he is so popular with his generation, that's a problem.
Ms Rachel THREATENED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9E5YGVPASo&t=295s
Why is Ian Carrol calling that
French Canadian loon a 'neurosurgeon' when 10 years ago he was a grifting microbiologist taking handouts off Jeffery Epstein?
I deer hunt with a 30.06 and have shot hundreds of rounds. Absolutely zero chance that he was hit with a 30.06.
Period.
Thank you.
(PS: I am not convinced the guy is even dead)
I'm not even sure there was a bullet, but these kinds of debates about the "science" , legitimize the the narrative.
Bmans absolutely correct. Anyone that's saying Kirk was hit by a 30-06 is either ignorant or a $7,000 clubber. It's as simple as that. Cheers
Yeah its like they insert the most problematic facts,( gun, shooter, bullet) and the majority accept it and its supposed to create controversy and unprovable conspiracy discussion for years for "conspiratards" ( Thats the name for non positive and non "America is on the upswing", you know," black pilled doomers". Am i right Scorp? LOL!!! Put a trap door into the narrative as they did. Cement over the site, perfect! These are pissed on bread crumbs inserted by intelligence. No?
Post a Comment