On this edition of The Realist Report, we are joined by Jim Condit Jr.
for a debate about Adolf Hitler and World War II. Jim Condit Jr. has
produced an extremely thought provoking and highly controversial video
documentary titled
The Nazi-Zionist Connection: The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler, which you can view in it’s entirety on YouTube
here.
Jim and I will discuss our views of Adolf Hitler, National Socialism,
the true nature of WWII and it’s aftermath, and related matters. Tune
in for what will surely be an interesting program! Be sure to check out
Jim Condit Jr.’s websites including:
Real News 24/7,
VoteFraud.org, and
Guardians For Liberty.
John Friend's Blog
Truth Militia Radio
Archive
Download
Jim Condit Jr.
ReplyDeleteThe man who has not read Mein Kampf, but is none the less and expert (at collecting jew sourced books on Hitler).
Deanna Spingola with Carolyn Yeager and Jim Condit Jr - Debate Alleged Hitler Zionism Connections http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHK2Ek20Oyw
ReplyDeletehttp://www.barnesreview.org/holocaust-holocaust-other-c-80_79_46.html
ReplyDeletehttp://www.barnesreview.org/holocaust-holocaust-handbooks-c-80_79_74.html
Jim Condit is a great guy. Don't agree with his Hitler views but the rest of his work is spot on.
ReplyDeleteHis radio ads and precinct strategy are excellent, and he's a long time fighter.
Khazaria was known to be a "melting pot" of all nations. There wasn't a "Khazarian race". This is the origin of them wanted a multiracial mercenary state as it was the country they had the most control over in the past.
ReplyDeleteOnly a few in the ruling class converted and furthermore, many Jews moved to Khazaria once it was set up to be their base of operations.. so the particular genetics of Khazaria in modern Jews would be minimal. They got the 5-15% Slavic genes Ashkenazi were gotten elsewhere.. possibly from buying Slavic slaves from the Ottomans or similar means.
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/
ReplyDelete> With regards to Strasser:
ReplyDelete· Paul Silverberg, Jewish, financed Gregor Strasser, not Hitler. Silverberg was head of the R.A.G., one of the largest coal companies in the entire world. He supported the chancellor ruling by presidential decree (Brüning in particular).
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/demystification_of_the_birth_of_the_nsdap.php
He was working for the other side. He was an ardent supporter of the USSR as well. If you look at his actual philosophy it was against private ownership of land.. which is one of the main tenents of communism. I will also tell you that in Jewish prophecy, it says the Jews must own all the world's land in order for their Mosiach to arrive.
http://mk.christogenea.org/content/lies-otto-strasser-and-douglas-reed-part-1 (not a fan of CI but this article seems legit)
>Dunkirk
http://archive.org/details/DeannaSpingola-TheTruthAndLiesAboutTheBattleAtDunkirk
>Havara agreement
http://revblog.codoh.com/2012/06/from-state-induced-emigration-of-jews-to-evacuation-to-the-alleged-mass-murder/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbgoUKKmcEM
Interesting patterns are developing with respect to disinformation mongers acting on behalf of the jewish crime ring.
ReplyDeleteAs you know, certain people have been recently branding questioners of the Sandy Hook Shooting Operation as "tin-foilers" and "conspiracy theorists".
“CONSPIRACY THEORY”
…where did that term come from?
Today, if you don’t believe the 911 LIE - you’re a “Conspiracy Theorist”. Today, if you don’t believe the Sand Hook Shooting Hoax - you’re a “Conspiracy Theorist”.
Who began calling people “Conspiracy Theorists”…and when?
In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report” .
CIA Document #1035-960, marked "PSYCH" for presumably Psychological Warfare Operations, in the division "CS", the Clandestine Services, sometimes known as the "dirty tricks" department. The dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.
http://mtracy9.tripod.com/cia_instructions.htm
JIM CONDIT JR.
Jim Condit Jr. attempts to sell a yarn about Hitler being jewish and acting on behalf of jewry. Why? This is a misdirection ploy probably coming directly from the CIA.
Misdirection strategies just as we say post Sandy Hook.
SANDY HOOK SHOOTING PSY OP STRATEGY
The evil strategy seems to attempt to draw discussion AWAY from evidence that the event was planned to influence public opinion.
This massive discussion on whether or not it was an outright hoax – seems to be what they want.
This is a smoke screen.
That event was DEFINITELY designed to influence public opinion.
It does not matter if people were really killed or not. This event was done BY THE GOVERNMENT and was intended to INFLUENCE PUBLIC OPINION.
They WANT you to get bogged down in the fucking details. Just like 9/11. Did they use nano-thermite? Did they use micro-nukes?
WHO GIVES A FUCK WHAT THEY USED.
BOTTOM LINE: The fucking jews did it.
JIM CONDIT’s SMOKE SCREEN
Was Hitler a jew? Was Hitler a Rothschild agent? What about all of these so-called "facts" about the war that come to us after passing through jewish censors? Do they prove that Hitler was "working for the enemy"? Keep it up Mr. Condit. Don't focus on what the jews are doing to us. Keep generating that smoke screen.
And hope to GOD that you are not brought to justice for doing it.
JIM CONDIT JR.s JEWISH STRATEGY
The jews have long sought to attempt to sully and tarnish Adolf Hitler’s reputation.
WHY?
For the exact same reason they destroyed the tomb of RUDOLF HESS.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14232768
The jews went to great lengths to destroy that mans grave.
Jim Condit Jr. is working to try to do what he can to destroy the memory of Adolf Hitler.
I say FUCK CONDIT and the donkey he rode in on.
We’ve had enough of this shit.
Great points Lugh, and thanks for those links. I think Condit oversimplifies the Dunkirk situation - it wasn't as easy as he claims it would have been to simply arrest the BEF, overthrow Churchill, and end the war in the West. Logistically and militarily, taking Dunkirk and arresting the BEF would have been a much more difficult task - if it was even possible at all - than Condit presents.
ReplyDeleteIn my view, his sources for Hitler receiving funding from Jewish international bankers are totally bunk. Veronica Clark's article explains all this in great detail. Plus, Strasser has an agenda and was anti-Hitler. He may have even been a Communist agent, as Lugh pointed out above.
The Transfer Agreement was simply a means to rid Germany of its Jewish population. It was beneficial to the NS program on two fronts - getting Jews out of Germany and increasing German exports.
All of Hitler's words, speeches, and actions demonstrate he was the real deal, and NOT a puppet of anyone, especially the Jewish bankers who were hellbent on destroying Germany and the German nation.
Finished the second half:
ReplyDelete>IBM
Which was founded by the son of German immigrants, supplied funding to Hitler early on, the accusations of collusions are bullshit (they sold them alot of machines early on.. s'bout it) as many Aryan business men and Aryan corporations did as it was a guaranteed return on their money with the economic miracle that occurred there. In Europe there are alot of old aristocratic families who are wealthy who would have supported him against the Jews, as the Jews hate the natural European aristocrats (the "bourgeois").
>Douglas Reed
His collusion with Strasser just shows him to be the Jim Marrs of his day, out there to discredit Hitler. Look at the type of gibberish he's spouting:
According to Reed, the "House of Joseph" believed the Divine Principle is love and universal brotherhood. These Jews were inclined to identify with their gentile neighbors and devote their energies to the common betterment of humanity.
On the other hand, the "Levites" championed a vision of a capricious vengeful God ("Moloch") that demanded his followers segregate themselves ("chosen people") and obey an arbitrary law.
"Obeying the Lord and achieving hegemony over the gentiles were synonymous. If the Levites didn't obey, they would be persecuted. If they did, they would destroy the Gentiles and rule the earth. Persecution, revenge and destruction, was an integral part of their identity."
>Irgun
No evidence to substantiate what he's talking about. In fact Irgun helped capture Eichmann. They made a strange attempt to work with them but they were a terrorist group and likely were just trying to spy on them. NSDAP working with the Mufti of Jerusalem rebukes this as well.
The Stalingrad issue was covered in the Hitler: Greatest Story Never Told. Their supply lines got cut off.
Most of his other conclusions are conjecture (comparing Hitler speeches to Obama LOL, watch them side by side and say that), double think and "what if?"s (which you can bring up about anything).
The argument that WWII was to set up Israel is weak, as it took the piss out of Communism. Personally, I think the original plan for communism was to mark the Red Army right to the Eurphrates to set up Eretz Israel, as opposed to this poor game of "wack a mole" which Israel is playing in the middle east today. They never had more control then under communism, and they spent 30-40 years after WW2 to keep propping it up.
If I missed anything let me know.
Great show and coverage John Friend with excellent comments Lugh. Keep the flame of truth alive, Guys! --CSR
ReplyDeleteJohn you were not prepared to debate this guy.His talking points were the same as when he debated Carolyn Yeager.You gave him way too much time.You should have kept the first caller on ,you clearly needed help,the other caller came up empty also.Maybe have a second round with Deanna as a partner with this guy.
ReplyDeleteI actually disagree with the above. John stated that he doesn't claim to know everything. Look at Condit, he thinks that Hitler was some ZioRothJew, but he's only read parts of mein kampf!?
ReplyDeleteKeep up the great work John!
MCP recently threw together a great quick article on these issues. Great for throwing at someone who's sceptical: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=8153&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bush-rockefeller-rothschild-hitler
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link Lugh. I encourage everyone to read it.
ReplyDelete