"9/11 was an inside job," is by now a familiar mantra in the small but active alternative online community. It has even found its way into the mainstream, despite years of ridicule and the heavy presence of COINTELPRO types derailing efforts to investigate and publish the truth of what happened on 9/11.
So, was it really an 'inside job'? Certainly, there is evidence that Israeli intelligence and elements in the U.S. government colluded to cover-up what really happened and used the event for their own gain. We know that prior to 9/11, certain high-level members of Bush Jr.'s administration dreamed of 'a new Pearl Harbor', the catalyst for expanding American hegemony...
But does that necessarily mean they orchestrated it? What about the evidence for 9/11 being an 'outside job'? Dr. Judy Wood has undertaken research into many anomalous aspects of the attacks that day, particularly in Lower Manhattan. The evidence she presents in her book Where Did The Towers Go? points to some form of 'exotic technology' being responsible for bringing down the Twin Towers.
This week, we're going to discuss the events surrounding, during and after 9/11 from a broader perspective. Joining us as we revise the revisionists' history of 9/11 is Lisa Guliani, former internet-based political talk show host, political writer, researcher and activist
SOTT Talk Radio
Download
Lindsey calls in to the show at 2:30:22 and tries to steer the conversation his way and they blow him off. LoL
ReplyDelete[i]Lindsey calls in to the show at 2:25:25 and tries to steer the conversation his way and they blow him off.[/i]
[b]PRICELESS[/b]
ReplyDeleteThose are bb codes anon. They do not work here. You need to use HTML tags instead. Next time replace [ by <
Where ith my Linthey ? Pleath come Home !
ReplyDeleteThanks for doing all the work on this one Mami. I'm feeling lazy today. LOL
ReplyDeleteSOTT sucks. They can't say the word j e w. Screw them, they are a fat joke.
ReplyDeleteI listened to it this morning, and thought it was entertaining. Lisa Guliani is always fun to listen to, she tells it like she sees it.
ReplyDeletePushing Jewdy Woods stuff is worse than a joke. HOW it was done matters not. There were many tools and fools used for this jew banker job.
ReplyDeleteYou need to use HTML tags instead.
ReplyDeleteok ...thanks
-----------------------------------
Lindsey calls in to the show at 2:25:25 and tries to steer the conversation his way and they blow him off.
PRICELESS
"Lindsey calls in to the show at 2:25:25 and tries to steer the conversation his way and they blow him off."
ReplyDeleteI guess you heard what you wanted to hear. THAT was one bizarre characterization. Got much of a hard-on for Lindsey? LOL
"Got much of a hard-on for Lindsey?" LMAO No man could possibly have a hard-on for Lindsey when Judy the "Woody Maker" is around.
ReplyDeleteJudy Wood is real attractive, surely she can't be Jewish. Wood sounds like an English name.
ReplyDeleteSOTT is a patriotard website. It has as much credibility as Alex Jones.
ReplyDeleteYou can read about SOTT here. It's pure conspirtard trash. Kosher certified:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sott.net/page/1-About-Sott-net
I heard Lisa Giuliani say Lindsey's last name when he called in. But I couldn't understand what she said because of the poor audio quality. Did she say "Packet" or "Packit" or "Padgett" or what? Does anybody know for sure?
ReplyDeleteLord Lithney is a fat joke.
ReplyDeleteNo one "blew-me-off" and you haters only ever hear what you want to hear. They had less than 30 minutes to the show, and only had a minute or so for the next caller, who was to be me. After I said what I needed to say to try to get them to talk about SOMETHING REAL AND RELEVANT, and also to promote ZCF's work and Victor Thorn's breakthrough work, "911 Evil--Israel's Central Role in the 911 Attacks," they then wanted to spend the rest of the time DISCUSSING THE ISSUE THAT I HAD FINALLY BROUGHT-UP.
ReplyDeleteYou people are fucking despicable.
Lindsey
NB: Whatever she said is not my last name, but is what she always thought that it was. HA!
Hey Lindsey, where are your activism videos you've promised? Or is the camera "broken" again?
ReplyDeletelol
WTF is SOTT? Seems like some leftard faggy toofer radio.
ReplyDeleteawesome!
ReplyDeleteindeed
Dr Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood UNEDITED Part 1
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJZrj0leylc
NB: Whatever she said is not my last name, but is what she always thought that it was. HA!
ReplyDeleteYeah, right. Lindsey, when Lisa Giuliani said your last name, you almost had a heart attack. Your reaction was audible and palpable. You're so full of shit.
p.s. I think your name might be "Baggett" rather than "Packett".
Lindsey, why don't you fuck off back to Thailand so you can be with your ladyboys?
ReplyDeleteI clearly heard when she said Lindsey FAGGET.
ReplyDeleteI sweat to God.
These radio hosts seems to be very aware of jewish involvement in 9/11 but are afraid to touch it with ten feet pole. There are ten billion troofer-poofter sites like that and they're all completely useless.
ReplyDeleteThis is even the first time i heard about SOTT network, so they're completely irrelevant and there is not even any reason to call in for.
Is this the kind activism that Lindsey promotes?
Jewy Wood doesn't look a bit jewish you fecking jew-hating goys.
ReplyDeletehttp://wheredidthetowersgo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/author.jpg
Jew Krapner doesn't look jewish either, although they could be brother and sister.
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jhSqbvYtCyY/0.jpg
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/author.jpg
ReplyDeleteHoly jew balls, get out the measuring tape! That has more hook then an eagle beak!
Holy shiat, how many Jewlianis are out there?
ReplyDeleteShamshilli was pushing Judy Wood really hard all the time recently. That should tell you all you should know. Judy Wood is the media's last line defense against 100% proof that nearly ALL the videos supposedly shot on 9-11, are previously manufactured fakes. Here's 100% proof of how the buildings and the 'jumpers' were faked (shots and videos that Judy Wood considers authentic without any further investigation):
ReplyDeleteTHE KING KONG MAN
"PEOPLE FALLING FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER /HANGING OUT OF WINDOWS"
Incontrovertible proof of sloppy digital compositing
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2374833#p2374833
Her doctoral highness does not deal with 'beliefs,' she deals with 'evidence' and what is most of her 'scientific' evidence aside from the seismic footprints, the fragility of the bathtub and the evidence for hurricane Erin ? Photographs and videos she takes for granted as authentic ! Her evidence is photos from a guy named Joel Meyerowitz (the only photographer allowed at ground zero) and videos from Camera Planet run by another guy named Stephen Rosenbaum, who just happens to have collected over 500 hours of 'amateur' video, the archives from which almost every video you've ever seen online or on TV has ultimately came from, first fake videos in crap quality and later in 2010 in better quality, all the more obviouly fake than before . And as we all know photos and video can never possibly be faked, especially in this day and age, and especially when almost all the crucial 9-11 images and video can ultimately be traced to basically two Jewish run sources.
Wood has neither provided proof of the authenticity of her images and videos nor proof of the so-called 'Hutchison effect.' Even Ace Baker stumped her on the Hutchison effect and surprise, surprise, Collin, like Wood, also gatekeeps proven non-plane fakery and proven Vicsims info.
Introductory Tour Guide to the September Clues research by Simon Shack -
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477
http://www.independentmail.com/news/2011/aug/05/why-911-victims-names-are-missing-federal-registry/
http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm
http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims.htm
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september122010/911-reflections-ew.php
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2011/jul/09/30pt-hed1-15-inches-of-story-goes-herep/
9:26 PM
ReplyDeleteWere WTC towers CGI holograms as well?
Retards who push this 9/11 "fake video" and "fake pictures" garbage are either mentally ill trailer trash who need to go back on their meds or they're CIA/Mossad spooks deliberately trying to discredit the idea that 9/11 was an Israeli false flag.
ReplyDeleteSo which one are you, faggot?
Cluesforum is a Kike owned conspiritard website, just like Godlikeproductions and Abovetopsecret.
ReplyDeleteIt's all the same kosher horseshit.
coup de grace -> Jeff Rense has an exclusive story that states that Obama is not real but a hologram.
ReplyDeleteKeep in mind:
ReplyDeletehttp://milesmathis.com/gauss.pdf
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
ReplyDeleteIf NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 3 hours before the actual collapse?
ReplyDeleteWe already know that 911 twoofers base their magical theories on movies.
How about answering the questions?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
Jew jew jew jew jew, jewwwww!
ReplyDelete@ "Were WTC towers CGI holograms as well?"
ReplyDeleteYou're confusing holograms with CGI. When you go see a Hollywood movie, they don't project stupid holograms and film it. They just manufacture the shot part live with actors, part green-screen or blue-screen CGI. Same with the ENTIRE stupid-ass movie billions of people saw on 9-11. It was all smoke and mirrors repeated endlessly for shock-and-awe paralysis of most people's reasoning and logic.
For blatantly obvious proof of fake buildings and fake 'jumpers' read the posts by Simon Shack on this page:
THE KING KONG MAN
"PEOPLE FALLING FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER /HANGING OUT OF WINDOWS"
Incontrovertible proof of sloppy digital compositing
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2374833#p2374833
Holograms and CGI have almost nothing to do with each other. There were no holograms or projected 3-D anything for 'witnesses' to see, only conflicting stories by different people claiming they saw 'planes,' most of them after the fake news story had re-assured them that there were planes by showing fake ones on TV. They also had their own actors in there to push the planes but the routine HARD EVIENCE, available in all plane crashes, to back up all these so-called claims by so-called real witnesses never arrived:
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career. Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic:
"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, (supposedly) resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet NOT ONE PIECE of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …"
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
"Between the four airplanes which allegedly crashed on 911 there should be approximately 9 million parts. 3 million parts each for the 767 and 1.5 million parts for the 757. In addition to the parts there should be 60 miles of wiring for each 757 or 120 miles for both. There is 90 miles of wiring
on each 767 which makes 180 miles for both 767's. Wiring is stamped every 12 inches or so with data which includes where it is going, where it is coming from and its maximum load capacity. The reason for this is that wiring is braided into bundles of up to one hundred wires and when you are tracing
down a problem you have to know quickly which wire you are looking for and identify it."
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1155&p=2370129&hilit=3+million+parts#p2370129
Stop copypasting that jewish crap, moron.
ReplyDeleteYou're obviously are just a hologram.
May 11, 2013 at 5:38 AM
ReplyDeleteLord Linthey, is dat you? How's your cholestorol levels?
Its simple really, planes were used in New York. Were they commercial airline planes or military planes camouflaged as commercial jets planes?
ReplyDeleteAnd a missile or drone was used at the Pentagon. And a missile was likely used at Shanksville PA.
Thousands of witnesses saw planes go into the towers live on both sides of the Hudson River.
So how was CGI graphics or holograms used when people saw it in person?
The CGI graphics/hologram bullshit theory might fly if people didn't see the planes live in person.
And please don't say that the govt paid off thousands of random people in that single day just to confirm that planes hit the towers.
Again what kind of planes were they? Who knows? But there were planes that hit the towers.
Damn, this is getting old. 9/11 was almost 12 years ago and still people still argue about who did it and how it was done.
Yet no one mentions or discusses what happened AFTER 911. Like DHS, TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA, war in the Mideast where we lost more U.S. soldiers than we lost people on 9/11.
Few talk about who benefited from 9/11? The WTC towers were going to be condemned and taken down or extensively renovated at a very high cost. Either renovation or a demolition would have cost a lot of money.
How convenient for the owners of the WTC towers that the towers were attacked. Especially after a new insurance policy for the towers
went in effect with a double indemnity clause like for a terrorist event.
So now the problems of having the towers renovated or demolished are taken care of for free. We go to war against OBL who ended up dying in December 2001.
We pass all these laws against the American public under the guise of peace and safety. Silverman gets paid off for the buildings. Israel is happy again. We go to war under the guise of fighting the enemy when we are helping control the poppy fields and the distribution of it.
And now here we are nearly 12 years later still focusing on nutty theories such as CGI and holograms and ignoring other aspects of 911. Namely the after affects of 911 and who really benefited from 9/11.
The powers that be have paid well to keep people focused in the wrong directions. Ask yourself why.
Sorry, mate, too long, didn't read.
ReplyDeleteJudy Wood is disinfo. It is a complete waste of time to judge what happened on 9/11 on the basis of faked photos and faked videos. Wood is wasting everyone's time by having them investigate esoteric weapons technology.
ReplyDeleteMedia fakery is very obvious because the paths of the planes don't match. Also the color of the sky in various videos, and the backgrounds don't match. You can watch scenes of the towers falling, and people running away, and a fellow will run THROUGH another fellow. That is impossible. Therefore the video is faked.
I don't know why people are so resistant to the fact that the vids and photos are faked. The research has shown that very few of the dead from 9/11 actually show up on the SSDI. Also serial numbers of the planes that supposedly crashed on 9/11 were recorded as being in use after 9/11. Why? Why did the laws of physics, the normal operation of national defense and bureaucracy stop on 9/11?
Looks like CTCole77 from youtube has found his way to mamis blog
ReplyDeleteNo surprise that Christopher Marlowe the Christard believes that all the 9/11 video is "fake".
ReplyDeletePeople who believe in magical Jewish rabbis who walk on water and rise from the dead will pretty much believe anything.
ReplyDeleteJews protecting their nine11 op.
Disgusting.