Sofia has no understanding of science or chemistry, never mind most other things she prattles on about, including forensics or investigative procedure. She's a Red herring in this debate. Her cohorts will regret shacking up with her conspiracy-du-jour brand of shallow research. She really screwed the pooch when she tried inserting the "viewing this in multiple dimensions" nonsense. Anyone with any background in visual arts has gotten a good laugh out of that silliness. Hey-it beats working for a living, right?? BTW, does she also have an instruction booklet on reattaching foreskins? Did she learn that in her art history class as well? I just pulled mine out of a jar and stiched it back and it looks like hell...stinks too!
As far as I know, Sofia Smallstorm's "911 Mysteries" made after Eric Hufschmid's 911 documentary videos which were offered for free on his website. Most contents of her video re 911 came from Eric Hufschmid. It is a puzzle Smallstorm is praised and Eric Hufschmid is smeared for his work in the alternative media.
thank god we have a poster like george jones who seems to speak for all of us telling us that sh was not a hoax! buddy you and ms. spingola are as disinfo as they come when it comes to sh. i don't rely on fetzer, friend or anyone. the anomalies speak for themselves. have you an answer as to why there was a url up and running asking for donations for sh victims days before the shooting took place?
Spingola debunks quite a few anomalies. My goodness the fricken song and dance made over the Xmas trees. It speaks to the fact that all the hoax proponents did piss poor research that it was so easy for her to debunk. And the walking in circles video is quite clearly a loop. Smallstorm has no credibility after being caught faking sounds on her 911 video.
Abbott Horus, I don't know which part of the show you have a problem with but so far Deanna is putting to rest this so-called hoax. I would recommend you listen again.
I noticed you back-pedaled when you called her disinfo. It sounds like you were over-reacting and perhaps you had an honest moment after you posted an hour later. Good for you.
Abbot Horus, I addressed the issue that you referred to in my program on AFP on January 21. This what I said. I will also cover it in conjunction with Smallstorm's claims. "One researcher calls attention to the idea that web sites were created memorializing the victims before the event occurred. A mistake that many people make is due to their lack of understanding on reconfigured domains and IP addresses. I wrote an article on September 29, 2005 where I indicated that Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush created a web site to raise funds for the victims of Hurricane Katrina which hit southeast Louisiana the morning of August 29, 2005. However, I did a search on the origination date of the site through WHOSIS and the Bush/Clinton web site had a creation date of June 14, 2005. This seemed to indicate that Bush and Clinton had foreknowledge. Terry Melanson explained how this occurs. IP addresses and domains names are two completely different things. When someone creates a domain name, he/she has to set up a DNS record for that domain to reside on an already existing IP address. An IP address is only a unique identifier for a computer that is connected to the internet. In the case of the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund web site, they assigned the domain to a computer (server) that had been registered in 1988 for its particular IP address. Therefore, when I inquired through WHOIS, someone said, “Regarding your inquiry, the information reflected on the 'data as of' field is actually the last updated information for the IP address connected to that domain name.” That was accurate. That IP address was assigned to the “newly-created” domain name was refreshed with its info on that particular date. The only real info that needs to be considered when looking at domain names is the domain's creation date, which is was September 2, 2005. Domain names are registered and attached to an IP address of an existing computer server. This may also occur when someone reconfigures a web site or a domain to devote it to another issue. I created my first web site in the mid-1990s devoted to an activity that I was involved with at that time. I reconfigured the site a few years ago to reflect my current activities."
Poor Deana is just full of fear. Did they threaten you? I never did trust you and never will. Just like TUT you will lose all your listeners. heheheheeh
ROFLMFAO
ReplyDeleteWhatever dudes, they're all piling on Sofia--I don't care about the Sandy Hook psyop one way or the other.
ReplyDeleteI'll be forever in Sofia's debt for informing me that it's possible for circumcised gentiles to restore their foreskin.
If you've been butchered by the jew doctors, look up restoration--takes a couple of years, but your lady will love it.
Sofia has no understanding of science or chemistry, never mind most other things she prattles on about, including forensics or investigative procedure.
ReplyDeleteShe's a Red herring in this debate. Her cohorts will regret shacking up with her conspiracy-du-jour brand of shallow research. She really screwed the pooch when she tried inserting the "viewing this in multiple dimensions" nonsense. Anyone with any background in visual arts has gotten a good laugh out of that silliness.
Hey-it beats working for a living, right??
BTW, does she also have an instruction booklet on reattaching foreskins? Did she learn that in her art history class as well?
I just pulled mine out of a jar and stiched it back and it looks like hell...stinks too!
chris, search tlctugger.com, or try
ReplyDeleteThe natural penis and restoration(warning, it's a PDF)
Whatever you think about Sofia, she's got this one right.
This is serious, and I'm not kidding.
As far as I know, Sofia Smallstorm's "911 Mysteries" made after Eric Hufschmid's 911 documentary videos which were offered for free on his website. Most contents of her video re 911 came from Eric Hufschmid. It is a puzzle Smallstorm is praised and Eric Hufschmid is smeared for his work in the alternative media.
ReplyDeleteFantastic job by Deanna both parts 1 and 2. So far this should erase doubts that it was a hoax.
ReplyDeleteDeanna is simply the best researcher out there and additionally one of the most rational minds.
thank god we have a poster like george jones who seems to speak for all of us telling us that sh was not a hoax! buddy you and ms. spingola are as disinfo as they come when it comes to sh. i don't rely on fetzer, friend or anyone. the anomalies speak for themselves. have you an answer as to why there was a url up and running asking for donations for sh victims days before the shooting took place?
ReplyDeletewell deanna is not necessarily disinfo regarding sh since i believe she is sincere but she is wrong about her notion re sandy hook.
ReplyDeleteSpingola debunks quite a few anomalies. My goodness the fricken song and dance made over the Xmas trees. It speaks to the fact that all the hoax proponents did piss poor research that it was so easy for her to debunk. And the walking in circles video is quite clearly a loop.
ReplyDeleteSmallstorm has no credibility after being caught faking sounds on her 911 video.
Abbott Horus, I don't know which part of the show you have a problem with but so far Deanna is putting to rest this so-called hoax. I would recommend you listen again.
ReplyDeleteI noticed you back-pedaled when you called her disinfo. It sounds like you were over-reacting and perhaps you had an honest moment after you posted an hour later. Good for you.
ReplyDeleteGeorge Jones
ReplyDeletei did listen and you still haven't answered my question. deanna hasn't addressed it in this podcast either.
Abbot Horus, I addressed the issue that you referred to in my program on AFP on January 21. This what I said. I will also cover it in conjunction with Smallstorm's claims. "One researcher calls attention to the idea that web sites were created memorializing the victims before the event occurred. A mistake that many people make is due to their lack of understanding on reconfigured domains and IP addresses. I wrote an article on September 29, 2005 where I indicated that Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush created a web site to raise funds for the victims of Hurricane Katrina which hit southeast Louisiana the morning of August 29, 2005. However, I did a search on the origination date of the site through WHOSIS and the Bush/Clinton web site had a creation date of June 14, 2005. This seemed to indicate that Bush and Clinton had foreknowledge. Terry Melanson explained how this occurs. IP addresses and domains names are two completely different things. When someone creates a domain name, he/she has to set up a DNS record for that domain to reside on an already existing IP address. An IP address is only a unique identifier for a computer that is connected to the internet. In the case of the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund web site, they assigned the domain to a computer (server) that had been registered in 1988 for its particular IP address. Therefore, when I inquired through WHOIS, someone said, “Regarding your inquiry, the information reflected on the 'data as of' field is actually the last updated information for the IP address connected to that domain name.” That was accurate. That IP address was assigned to the “newly-created” domain name was refreshed with its info on that particular date. The only real info that needs to be considered when looking at domain names is the domain's creation date, which is was September 2, 2005. Domain names are registered and attached to an IP address of an existing computer server. This may also occur when someone reconfigures a web site or a domain to devote it to another issue. I created my first web site in the mid-1990s devoted to an activity that I was involved with at that time. I reconfigured the site a few years ago to reflect my current activities."
ReplyDeletePoor Deana is just full of fear. Did they threaten you? I never did trust you and never will. Just like TUT you will lose all your listeners. heheheheeh
ReplyDelete