Are you saying that the Fukushima information is bull shit?
I'm asking in all seriousness because I am trying to get to the bottom of this. Would like to move to the Oregon coast but not if this is serious. Thanks.
Other than that I agree with your assessment of Rense.
One day it's the Zionists; the next it's the globalists. How on earth can Rense have Webster Tarpley on!???
I am with Mr. Zapoper. I simply do not know "the truth" about what is REALLY happening with FUKUshima, and he is the ONLY, and I mean ONLYYYY, person covering this FUKUshima issue in-detail and consistently, and that really bothers me.
IF it was/is as bad and threatening as he is making it out to be, then why-the-fuck isn't EVERYONE covering this issue? I still appreciate him doing what he is doing, but I really would like an explanation as to why he is the ONLY one covering this if it is as deadly serious as it is "supposed" to be.
Are you saying that the Fukushima information is bull shit?
ReplyDeleteI'm asking in all seriousness because I am trying to get to the bottom of this. Would like to move to the Oregon coast but not if this is serious. Thanks.
Other than that I agree with your assessment of Rense.
One day it's the Zionists; the next it's the globalists. How on earth can Rense have Webster Tarpley on!???
Rense is a broadcast whore.
I haven't done tests with a Geiger counter so I have no idea as to what is going on about Fukushima.
ReplyDeleteAs for Rense, It seems to me that he's in it for the money and will mostly agree with any of his guests.
He sometimes has guests back to back saying opposite things and Rense does the chameleon and agrees with both of them. lol
I am with Mr. Zapoper. I simply do not know "the truth" about what is REALLY happening with FUKUshima, and he is the ONLY, and I mean ONLYYYY, person covering this FUKUshima issue in-detail and consistently, and that really bothers me.
ReplyDeleteIF it was/is as bad and threatening as he is making it out to be, then why-the-fuck isn't EVERYONE covering this issue? I still appreciate him doing what he is doing, but I really would like an explanation as to why he is the ONLY one covering this if it is as deadly serious as it is "supposed" to be.
Lindsey