There's a picture of Keesha Rogers holding an Obama-as-Hitler picture.
Whatever one thinks of Obama, you have to consider how the average person will react to such a picture, and it's liable to provoke a negative response, even in those who are on the fence, and even among some who are vocal opponents of Obama.
Overall, it discredits the message, and there are other issues, such as Obama being a figurehead for bigger powers, and it was actually Hillary's plan to have a mandate, which Obama spoke out against during the primaries.
So it shows that he's more of an opportunist and less of an ideologue, and the plan is socialistic more than fascistic, but I'm sure this is all part of LaRouche's plan to confuse people.
Another issue that came out of Rense's interview with Rogers is his deliberate two-facedness. When he has certain guests on, he will rail against Zionists, and when he has LaRouche people on, he will talk about the City of London being behind most of the world's evil machinations.
The most recent example of his egregious forked tongue is comparing this interview and that of Lyndon LaRouche with the previous night's interview with Richard Sauder, where he was decrying the "Zionist putsch" behind Ukraine, whereas in the LaRouche interviews, he goes along with the false "British Empire" narrative.
There's a picture of Keesha Rogers holding an Obama-as-Hitler picture.
ReplyDeleteWhatever one thinks of Obama, you have to consider how the average person will react to such a picture, and it's liable to provoke a negative response, even in those who are on the fence, and even among some who are vocal opponents of Obama.
http://109.imagebam.com/download/YOxqs3GwapQ82m3WEYXcAA/31061/310601043/kesha%20rogers%20obama%20sign%20resized.jpg
Overall, it discredits the message, and there are other issues, such as Obama being a figurehead for bigger powers, and it was actually Hillary's plan to have a mandate, which Obama spoke out against during the primaries.
So it shows that he's more of an opportunist and less of an ideologue, and the plan is socialistic more than fascistic, but I'm sure this is all part of LaRouche's plan to confuse people.
Another issue that came out of Rense's interview with Rogers is his deliberate two-facedness. When he has certain guests on, he will rail against Zionists, and when he has LaRouche people on, he will talk about the City of London being behind most of the world's evil machinations.
ReplyDeleteThe most recent example of his egregious forked tongue is comparing this interview and that of Lyndon LaRouche with the previous night's interview with Richard Sauder, where he was decrying the "Zionist putsch" behind Ukraine, whereas in the LaRouche interviews, he goes along with the false "British Empire" narrative.
Her first name only have one e. It was originally Lakesha.
ReplyDelete