4 minutes in, Deanna made a cryptic reference to someone in the "Truth movement" who apparently said that the U.S. isn't doing enough for Israel.
No need for keeping the person's name a secret, unless it's someone who has already been outed as a Zionist shill like Alex Jones, or is an open Zionist like Gary Franchi of Restore the Republic and Next News Network.
At 1h51m, the guest asked how top 9/11 Truth movement figures can ignore Dr. Judy Wood.
One of those figures, Richard Gage, explained on video why he does that, because he said he doesn't want to discuss things that he can't explain (toasted cars, not much of a seismic footprint for such a destruction, so much paper yet hardly even many fragments of office furniture).
It seems that the explosives/nanothermite theory also doesn't explain key aspects of the destruction of the towers according to what is being presented as evidence, so he's blameworthy according to his own standards.
Yet, the implication is that gatekeepers are unfairly keeping Judy Wood out of the discussion, and I agree with that, but I raise the additional point -- what makes you think that isn't part of their intent, too, to raise her credibility and further fracture the movement.
And furthermore, what about aspects of her presentation that don't address all aspects, either? For instance, just as there is an obvious problem with the footprint of the towers and the reported seismic data, who's to say we can trust that data?
Would a government that allegedly created a super-secret directed energy weapon be above faking results, or have nothing to gain by doing so. The fracture between AE 9/11 and Judy Wood on this point alone shows a motive for fabricating such results.
Thanks for that. I later noticed it was him in seeing this YouTube clip from an interview I hadn't listened to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3xdFlrdyB8
As MCP drew to our attention, Cass Sunstein was specifically concerned about disrupting conspiracy theories involving Israel, and Halbig definitely won't go there.
But the question is, will you (everyone on here) let that stop you from judging his claims independently of what may be a deliberate trap?
Mr. Capitalist, I have said all that I have to say on this issue in a rather long post here that everyone has seen, but people are STILL falling for the divide-and-conquer strategem employed by the demons walking-on-two-legs.
I am absolutely convinced now, more than ever, that unless and until this "movement", or whatever-the-fuck it is, can come together and WORK TOGETHER towards the common-goal that all of us have, we are absolutely doomed, and that division is exactly what was intended for all of the inconsistencies that were allowed to be "revealed" on various incidents, from The Pentagon NOT being attacked by that jet to the very real incident of Sandy Hook. What I mean is that there were "JUST ENOUGH" inconsistencies reported on via the media and others to have people attacking each other and destroying relationships that have been built while exposing the truths as they are, and NOW look at where we are in this division.
I will never not believe that this was all by-design, and regardless of whatever the ultimate truth is about Sandy Hook and other muddied incidents, the FACT remains that we have never been more divided in this REAL truth-movement than we are now.
End of discussion.
Lindsey
NB: I want people to understand something ELSE: All of this division comes-on-the-heels of an awakening taking-place among the stupid- and ignorant-masses UNLIKE ANY THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN, PERIOD. There are more people, now, on the message-boards of Yajoo! "news" and YouTube-ADL telling the truth about the demons walking-on-two-legs and the shit that they have done than EVER--AT ANY TIME OF WHICH I AM AWARE IN ANY MEDIUM--, and despite that wonderful news, look at where we are in-terms of activism/outreach, and cohesion...
I REALLY WANT EVERY ONE OF YOU TO THINK ABOUT WHAT I SAID.
4 minutes in, Deanna made a cryptic reference to someone in the "Truth movement" who apparently said that the U.S. isn't doing enough for Israel.
ReplyDeleteNo need for keeping the person's name a secret, unless it's someone who has already been outed as a Zionist shill like Alex Jones, or is an open Zionist like Gary Franchi of Restore the Republic and Next News Network.
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/04/05/meet-gary-franchi-the-radical-zionist-behind-next-news-network/
At 1h51m, the guest asked how top 9/11 Truth movement figures can ignore Dr. Judy Wood.
ReplyDeleteOne of those figures, Richard Gage, explained on video why he does that, because he said he doesn't want to discuss things that he can't explain (toasted cars, not much of a seismic footprint for such a destruction, so much paper yet hardly even many fragments of office furniture).
It seems that the explosives/nanothermite theory also doesn't explain key aspects of the destruction of the towers according to what is being presented as evidence, so he's blameworthy according to his own standards.
Yet, the implication is that gatekeepers are unfairly keeping Judy Wood out of the discussion, and I agree with that, but I raise the additional point -- what makes you think that isn't part of their intent, too, to raise her credibility and further fracture the movement.
And furthermore, what about aspects of her presentation that don't address all aspects, either? For instance, just as there is an obvious problem with the footprint of the towers and the reported seismic data, who's to say we can trust that data?
Would a government that allegedly created a super-secret directed energy weapon be above faking results, or have nothing to gain by doing so. The fracture between AE 9/11 and Judy Wood on this point alone shows a motive for fabricating such results.
Yes let's not keep Wolfgang HalBIGs name a secret!
ReplyDeleteThanks for that. I later noticed it was him in seeing this YouTube clip from an interview I hadn't listened to.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3xdFlrdyB8
As MCP drew to our attention, Cass Sunstein was specifically concerned about disrupting conspiracy theories involving Israel, and Halbig definitely won't go there.
But the question is, will you (everyone on here) let that stop you from judging his claims independently of what may be a deliberate trap?
Mr. Capitalist, I have said all that I have to say on this issue in a rather long post here that everyone has seen, but people are STILL falling for the divide-and-conquer strategem employed by the demons walking-on-two-legs.
ReplyDeleteI am absolutely convinced now, more than ever, that unless and until this "movement", or whatever-the-fuck it is, can come together and WORK TOGETHER towards the common-goal that all of us have, we are absolutely doomed, and that division is exactly what was intended for all of the inconsistencies that were allowed to be "revealed" on various incidents, from The Pentagon NOT being attacked by that jet to the very real incident of Sandy Hook. What I mean is that there were "JUST ENOUGH" inconsistencies reported on via the media and others to have people attacking each other and destroying relationships that have been built while exposing the truths as they are, and NOW look at where we are in this division.
I will never not believe that this was all by-design, and regardless of whatever the ultimate truth is about Sandy Hook and other muddied incidents, the FACT remains that we have never been more divided in this REAL truth-movement than we are now.
End of discussion.
Lindsey
NB: I want people to understand something ELSE: All of this division comes-on-the-heels of an awakening taking-place among the stupid- and ignorant-masses UNLIKE ANY THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN, PERIOD. There are more people, now, on the message-boards of Yajoo! "news" and YouTube-ADL telling the truth about the demons walking-on-two-legs and the shit that they have done than EVER--AT ANY TIME OF WHICH I AM AWARE IN ANY MEDIUM--, and despite that wonderful news, look at where we are in-terms of activism/outreach, and cohesion...
I REALLY WANT EVERY ONE OF YOU TO THINK ABOUT WHAT I SAID.