Duke said that the protocols are likely an allegory, which may or may not be true. He also said that the jews were likely a race, no matter where they are from, which discounts the Khazarian theory if true. I actually agree with Dr. D on this later point; Koestler was a zionist and wanted to divert attention from the fact that the jews are mainly a RACIAL Tribe, more so than a religion. Those who protest so much about the racism of others should have a long look in the mirror; which jews never do.
There are clues in the text of the Protocols that it was indeed written as propaganda by the Tsarist Secret Police, such as indirect praise for the monarchy, that no Jewish supremacists would've written.
Eg: (just search for sovereign or king)
"We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart."
That being said, the author(s) were geniuses with regard to their understanding of Jewish supremacism, rabid ethnocentrism and the plan for the 20th and 21st century, and even Alan Watt and Dr. Stan Monteith, who never even mention the Jewish factor in world events, except in praise or defense, have pointed to the author(s) having foreknowledge of the plan for the world's unfolding events -- they just say it was Masonic and/or globalist foreknowledge.
If we've learned anything from mainstream jewish media, we have learned that whatever they say or purport to the masses is always the opposite of or a twist on truth and reality. When jews say the protocols were a "fake" or a "forgery" that is obviously an attempt to discredit the damning findings within them as we have all read them and discovered they contain.
The very fact they call them "fakes" or "forgeries" implies there was something to model them after to start with.
I don't know about you all, but I certainly don't believe a word of anything these cretins say.
Just the fact they say that the protocols aren't real automatically persuades me into believing they were indeed real.
Make sense? Of course it does. Never trust a heeb. Under ANY circumstances. Period.
fauxcap thanks so much for your excellent observations on this. Always appreciate your comments; those that are not above my understanding, the BEST! Kind Regards.
David Duke, oh yeah, he's the guy that says the protocols are made up. Now, wonder why he said that? I'll pass
ReplyDeleteWrong thread. LOL
ReplyDeleteThey call it JEW-elry for a reason
ReplyDeleteDuke said that the protocols are likely an allegory, which may or may not be true. He also said that the jews were likely a race, no matter where they are from, which discounts the Khazarian theory if true. I actually agree with Dr. D on this later point; Koestler was a zionist and wanted to divert attention from the fact that the jews are mainly a RACIAL Tribe, more so than a religion. Those who protest so much about the racism of others should have a long look in the mirror; which jews never do.
ReplyDeleteThere are clues in the text of the Protocols that it was indeed written as propaganda by the Tsarist Secret Police, such as indirect praise for the monarchy, that no Jewish supremacists would've written.
ReplyDeleteEg: (just search for sovereign or king)
"We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart."
That being said, the author(s) were geniuses with regard to their understanding of Jewish supremacism, rabid ethnocentrism and the plan for the 20th and 21st century, and even Alan Watt and Dr. Stan Monteith, who never even mention the Jewish factor in world events, except in praise or defense, have pointed to the author(s) having foreknowledge of the plan for the world's unfolding events -- they just say it was Masonic and/or globalist foreknowledge.
No. It wasn't.
DeleteIf we've learned anything from mainstream jewish media, we have learned that whatever they say or purport to the masses is always the opposite of or a twist on truth and reality. When jews say the protocols were a "fake" or a "forgery" that is obviously an attempt to discredit the damning findings within them as we have all read them and discovered they contain.
The very fact they call them "fakes" or "forgeries" implies there was something to model them after to start with.
I don't know about you all, but I certainly don't believe a word of anything these cretins say.
Just the fact they say that the protocols aren't real automatically persuades me into believing they were indeed real.
Make sense? Of course it does. Never trust a heeb. Under ANY circumstances. Period.
fauxcap thanks so much for your excellent observations on this. Always appreciate your comments; those that are not above my understanding, the BEST! Kind Regards.
ReplyDelete