Devvy commented on how the judge was upset when the Texas prosecutor said he wouldn't ask for fines to be levied against her for her legal challenge against the validity of the 17th amendment.
The arrogance of these "officials." Sure, if it had been done by some nut or controlled opposition figure, then fines would be justified, but Devvy is a serious person.
The bottom line is that they restrict these cases based on their bogus interpretation of standing, saying her case couldn't be heard because she allegedly had no basis to challenge it.
That's as ridiculous as when cases challenging Obama's citizenship were thrown out for alleged lack of standing. Every American is affected by a President not being eligible for the office, just as every American is affected by the 17th amendment (direct election of Senators) not being properly ratified.
These legal shysters need to be aggressively exposed every chance we can get.
Devvy commented on how the judge was upset when the Texas prosecutor said he wouldn't ask for fines to be levied against her for her legal challenge against the validity of the 17th amendment.
ReplyDeleteThe arrogance of these "officials." Sure, if it had been done by some nut or controlled opposition figure, then fines would be justified, but Devvy is a serious person.
The bottom line is that they restrict these cases based on their bogus interpretation of standing, saying her case couldn't be heard because she allegedly had no basis to challenge it.
That's as ridiculous as when cases challenging Obama's citizenship were thrown out for alleged lack of standing. Every American is affected by a President not being eligible for the office, just as every American is affected by the 17th amendment (direct election of Senators) not being properly ratified.
These legal shysters need to be aggressively exposed every chance we can get.