This is a perfect portrayal of Jeff Rense's "Bi-Polarism".
With John Friend, it is the jews, jews, jews.
With pretty much everyone else, it's globalists, globalists, globalists.
So....does Jeff Rense really love truth as he claims?
Why does not Rense correct his other guests?
The sad reality is that Jeff Rense is all that he preaches against. Rense is also a traitor and only thinks about his bank account and the survival of his own arse.
I hope you read this Jeff. If the days are few as you claim and if the world is really in great peril; then why don't you care about the absolute truth?
The more people who expose the jew, the better our chances of survival.
So rebuke your guests Jeff who don't put the blame squarely on the Jewish Problem!
And with Webster Tarpley, Paul Craig Roberts and Joel Skousen, the globalists, or "Anglo-American elite."
Henry Makow did reveal that Rense was apparently making 400k a year, and that wasn't refuted by Rense -- he just took exception with claims about how he spent it.
Nothing wrong with making 400k a year in "this business," as Rense aptly referred to it at the start of his interview with Joyce Riley, but as Rebecca Carley aptly said on Charles Giuliani's show regarding Alex Jones, "you don't get rich by telling the truth."
So whether you are an outright agent like Alex Jones or at best, a shrewd businessman and fearmonger like Rense, you can't make that kind of money and consistently put out hard-hitting information.
Now in fairness, Rense does have some good and sincere regular guests, like Devvy Kidd and even Joel Skousen, who is a sincere, albeit, misguided, Zionist.
But he absolutely is in it for the lifestyle that he has become accustomed to, and will put that ahead of just being an internet broadcaster barely scraping out a living on donations and internet ads. I can't particularly blame him, so long as he would be honest when confronted. Most wouldn't do that, so he deserves a pass in that regard.
My big issue is whether his fearmongering is intentional for generating revenue, and I suspect it is, and I even have concerns of whether he is willfully blind to creating more problems than he thinks he is solving by constantly putting out fear about Fukushima and having big time fearmongers on like Bill Deagle.
This is a perfect portrayal of Jeff Rense's "Bi-Polarism".
ReplyDeleteWith John Friend, it is the jews, jews, jews.
With pretty much everyone else, it's globalists, globalists, globalists.
So....does Jeff Rense really love truth as he claims?
Why does not Rense correct his other guests?
The sad reality is that Jeff Rense is all that he preaches against. Rense is also a traitor and only thinks about his bank account and the survival of his own arse.
I hope you read this Jeff. If the days are few as you claim and if the world is really in great peril; then why don't you care about the absolute truth?
The more people who expose the jew, the better our chances of survival.
So rebuke your guests Jeff who don't put the blame squarely on the Jewish Problem!
And with Rifat, the Jews.
ReplyDeleteAnd with Webster Tarpley, Paul Craig Roberts and Joel Skousen, the globalists, or "Anglo-American elite."
Henry Makow did reveal that Rense was apparently making 400k a year, and that wasn't refuted by Rense -- he just took exception with claims about how he spent it.
Nothing wrong with making 400k a year in "this business," as Rense aptly referred to it at the start of his interview with Joyce Riley, but as Rebecca Carley aptly said on Charles Giuliani's show regarding Alex Jones, "you don't get rich by telling the truth."
So whether you are an outright agent like Alex Jones or at best, a shrewd businessman and fearmonger like Rense, you can't make that kind of money and consistently put out hard-hitting information.
Now in fairness, Rense does have some good and sincere regular guests, like Devvy Kidd and even Joel Skousen, who is a sincere, albeit, misguided, Zionist.
But he absolutely is in it for the lifestyle that he has become accustomed to, and will put that ahead of just being an internet broadcaster barely scraping out a living on donations and internet ads. I can't particularly blame him, so long as he would be honest when confronted. Most wouldn't do that, so he deserves a pass in that regard.
My big issue is whether his fearmongering is intentional for generating revenue, and I suspect it is, and I even have concerns of whether he is willfully blind to creating more problems than he thinks he is solving by constantly putting out fear about Fukushima and having big time fearmongers on like Bill Deagle.