Great news, indeed, and very important, since cases like this are usually thrown out due to standing issues, with the bogus claim by judges that the petitioners aren't eligible to have their case heard due to reasons like not being directly affected, etc.
And unlike a direct constitutional challenge, they are actually pointing to a statute, which is very important, since the court can't say that it's just the petitioners' interpretation of the constitution, but it's right there as active law because unfortunately these judges and lawyers have been trained to treat statutes more seriously than plain-meaning interpretations of the Constitution itself.
What I do wonder is how they can force the government to get loans from the Bank of Canada, and also how they can be made interest-free, since the provision just mentions loans, but not the interest rate, and of course the banksters will not want them to be interest-free.
But there is a nice way that the loans become effectively interest-free if the federal government does the borrowing, since the government is the sole shareholder of the Bank, and all profits return to the government.
I wonder if Canadian ZOG will label him a terrorist.
ReplyDeleteGreat news, indeed, and very important, since cases like this are usually thrown out due to standing issues, with the bogus claim by judges that the petitioners aren't eligible to have their case heard due to reasons like not being directly affected, etc.
ReplyDeleteAnd unlike a direct constitutional challenge, they are actually pointing to a statute, which is very important, since the court can't say that it's just the petitioners' interpretation of the constitution, but it's right there as active law because unfortunately these judges and lawyers have been trained to treat statutes more seriously than plain-meaning interpretations of the Constitution itself.
What I do wonder is how they can force the government to get loans from the Bank of Canada, and also how they can be made interest-free, since the provision just mentions loans, but not the interest rate, and of course the banksters will not want them to be interest-free.
But there is a nice way that the loans become effectively interest-free if the federal government does the borrowing, since the government is the sole shareholder of the Bank, and all profits return to the government.
Standing up to the banksters? must be an anti semite....
ReplyDelete