I like Jonathan Emord when he's criticizing Obama for all his unconstitutional actions, but not when he's talking a tough macho game about how bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nukes was good and necessary and how he says he would've had a direct rather than covert invasion against Cuba.
A declaration of war by Congress would be needed in all such cases, but it still doesn't make it wise to be so aggressive. He should know that Japan was baited into bombing Pearl Harbor anyway, when an oil embargo was unnecessarily placed against them (they hadn't directly attacked America before that), and there were diplomatic overtures to surrender with the only condition that the Emperor remain in place, and he was allowed to stay after the unconditional surrender anyway.
From an alternative researcher, I expect more temperance in such talk.
Emord also brought up the holocaust and "nazis as well as making a false comparison of Obama to Neville Chamberlain. Tells you everything you need to know about Emord. I thought MAYBE Jeff Rense would step in a say something about the holohoax. He said nothing. Just let Emord get away with it all. Good job Rense.
@PG - You seem to be under the mistaken impression that every alternative researcher is in agreement about Hitler being a 'good guy' and some kind of Christian (both of which are dubious claims). Besides, this guy is no worse than a lot of the other crackpots, nut-jobs and outright charlatans Rense has on his show on a regular basis. This one just pushed your buttons because he spoke badly about your hero.
Agree with ProGoyim about Rense not picking him up on his Nazi comments. I've studied the history and so has Rense; so for Rense to sit there in silence as this ignoramus defames and spreads lies with impunity, says as much about Rense as it does about his moronic guest. He does the same with his other guests, esp. Skousen. He knows the truth; but in order to kowtow to these imbeciles, he pretends to know nothing. So it all depends on who this flaky character interviews. Having a bob each way is as cowardly and as pathetic as telling bald-faced lies.
I like Jonathan Emord when he's criticizing Obama for all his unconstitutional actions, but not when he's talking a tough macho game about how bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nukes was good and necessary and how he says he would've had a direct rather than covert invasion against Cuba.
ReplyDeleteA declaration of war by Congress would be needed in all such cases, but it still doesn't make it wise to be so aggressive. He should know that Japan was baited into bombing Pearl Harbor anyway, when an oil embargo was unnecessarily placed against them (they hadn't directly attacked America before that), and there were diplomatic overtures to surrender with the only condition that the Emperor remain in place, and he was allowed to stay after the unconditional surrender anyway.
From an alternative researcher, I expect more temperance in such talk.
Emord also brought up the holocaust and "nazis as well as making a false comparison of Obama to Neville Chamberlain. Tells you everything you need to know about Emord. I thought MAYBE Jeff Rense would step in a say something about the holohoax. He said nothing. Just let Emord get away with it all. Good job Rense.
ReplyDelete@PG - You seem to be under the mistaken impression that every alternative researcher is in agreement about Hitler being a 'good guy' and some kind of Christian (both of which are dubious claims). Besides, this guy is no worse than a lot of the other crackpots, nut-jobs and outright charlatans Rense has on his show on a regular basis. This one just pushed your buttons because he spoke badly about your hero.
ReplyDeleteAgree with ProGoyim about Rense not picking him up on his Nazi comments. I've studied the history and so has Rense; so for Rense to sit there in silence as this ignoramus defames and spreads lies with impunity, says as much about Rense as it does about his moronic guest. He does the same with his other guests, esp. Skousen. He knows the truth; but in order to kowtow to these imbeciles, he pretends to know nothing. So it all depends on who this flaky character interviews. Having a bob each way is as cowardly and as pathetic as telling bald-faced lies.
ReplyDeleteScorpio, a funny follow-up to what you said about the "crackpots, nut-jobs and outright charlatans Rense has on his show on a regular basis."
ReplyDelete27 minutes into his interview with Christopher Bollyn, the following night, he said:
"We've [the alternative media] been penetrated by so many intel ops, phonies and liars."
http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/ggcf9imw5w/Rense.20150210.2of3.mp3
Fully agree that Rense is contributing to what he condemns.
Or perhaps Rense is allowing guests to shoot themselves in the foot?
ReplyDelete