Kapner comes off differently during these radio interviews. Instead of only giving a wily smile on his videos, he gives several wiley laughs.
Nothing's changed since he was interviewed by George Whitehurst-Berry I think sometime back in 2008-2009.
I mentioned it on Charlie Giuliani's show and some chatters dismissed it, but to get Kapner on a GCN show three times with over 10,000 daily listeners all the way back then is a big deal, and despite some since concluding that he is working for the other side, it was a big deal at the time to have someone speaking so openly about the Jewish elite, on Alex Jones' own network.
And George even got a complaint for one of the interviews, but a week later, probably once a local ADL operative got tipped off about it, and nothing was ever done about it, since George had a serious conversation.
Kapner was giving a wily laugh all the way back then, which I wondered about. I suspect Kapner is legit, but who knows for sure. It's not as easy as someone dressing up the way he does and looking like Krusty the Klown meaning that you're working for the other side. He's apparently been a sincere Christian for awhile now, supposedly since the 70s, and he does seem to know a lot better theology than most Christians do.
Regarding the Bollyn interview, 25 minutes in, he talks about all these fake events happening every day now. Notice he said fake and not just false flag events.
Then, at 33 minutes, he says his book is unique, because he says who did 9/11 (true, compared to Richard Gage and Judy Wood, most prominently).
He correctly says it's the same group of people who were behind the Malaysian flight shootdown over Ukraine and Charlie Hebdo, but what about the means? Why would 9/11 not also have had a high degree of fakery as he's saying about all these later events?
This is a question not only to be asked of him, but most prominent alternative researchers who are now saying most or all of these big events of the past two years are faked, but still think that nearly 3000 people died on 9/11 and real drones were used, as opposed to big time video fakery, fake deaths and hundreds if not thousands of actors.
I had a friend who was working in a WTC tower at the time and he told me that he was evacuated from the building. I don't see where your "hundreds if not thousands of actors" crapola comes into play here. The buildings were evacuated and demolished. The people evacuated were not fake. The buildings being demolished was not fake. No doubt some people died in this operation - maybe 3000. I don't see where you're going with this, Jason.
I keep saying - the crisis actors are Jewish, and the operation is to have Jew vicsims. Gentiles OTOH are more than expendable, it is to exalt YHWH to dupe them into killing each other or simply kill them.
Did you ever get interviewed, Rodin? Wasn't Nick (I think that is his name) going to interview you on these things. I'd be interested to hear your take on things. I think you might take things a little far, but your posts on the Icke forum were always interesting to me. I probably read the whole thread of one of them about Jewish fakery (and nuclear bombs I think it was). I've always been suspicious of the nuclear bomb claims for the simple fact of all of the lies that are always spewed in the media about them. That doesn't prove to me that they're false of course; but I've always been a bit leery on the subject. Even while taking the subject (nuclear physics) in college.
Kappner puts out some good info in his videos and names names but he is pro Putin and I have my suspicions that he is working for the kremlin ,novosti,Putin Or someone like that he puts out so many professionals produced videos there has to be someone behind him
I was once interviewed on Radio Scotland and hated it lol. Not about this stuff obviously.... I think if I were to formalise some of my pet theories it would first be in the form of some sort of presentation - book or video channel is on my mind... And would focus on science....
matt, and despite that, Kapner keeps begging for money, and he even told Whitehurst-Berry that he barely had two cents to rub together, and asked him for a donation, too.
Since he's dressed up like a priest of sorts, he shouldn't have need for all kinds of money for his own living. I suppose I could give him the benefit of the doubt that he's donating whatever's left from his production costs and basic living expenses to charity.
He did personally respond to an email I sent him one time about an interview, so that made me feel better that he's not just constantly begging for money and not responding to anyone except the big guys.
I know Zap thinks he's working for the other side, but there are sometimes "oddballs" out there. If he was working for the other side, I would've expected him to start changing his message and putting out things like Alex Jones did, that Arabs own Hollywood. It's things like that that add up over all the years that point to being an agent.
He is definitely so supportive of Putin, telling us what a great hero he is. There's no way you get to that level, and especially with his KGB background, and not have some dirt on your hands. While some others have stated it as fact, I think it's definitely a question as to whether he was involved in some of the terrorist incidents done by Chechen separatists. No reason why Russian intelligence wouldn't play some of the same tricks the U.S.-Israeli cabal has been regularly doing now.
Another reason that makes me suspect Kapner is legit is that he criticizes the Austrian School of Economics and its support for usury.
He initially pulled back that article and video after a lot of protest from a group of his supporters, but has since reconsidered for awhile now and has kept criticizing it.
blake, if you also don't accept the official 9/11 conspiracy, then you would perhaps think, as I do, that the timing of the building collapses were deliberate.
And as a result, I think they pulled the towers exactly when they wanted to, and not even a second early or late.
I fully expect that there were lots of real people there in the buildings that day, as the intent wasn't to pull the building right away. It would be very interesting to know when your friend got out, as if it was close to the time they told us that each of the towers collapsed, then it would show an intent to kill many of the remaining people.
Where I'm going with all this is documented fakery on that day, such as the "King Kong Man" who is taller than any documented human being who ever lived, as he's standing in the window in one video, or the "Falling Man," where the sides of the towers don't match up with what it would have to look like, and the flying birds in one "live" shot that suddenly all uniformly fly faster in the second half of the screen, or the 2500+ alleged victims who don't show up in the Social Security Death Index, despite a purported 75%+ accuracy rate.
And the figure of nearly 3000 -- it's around the number of those said to have died in the Pearl Harbor attacks, and 9/11 has been called a New Pearl Harbor.
I'm not saying most or none of the purported 3000 victims are real, I'm saying there may have been widespread fakery on different levels, and I am asking those prominent alternative researchers (Christopher Bollyn, Charles Giuliani and others) who have gone on the public record and said that these recent big events are fake, and that the same people behind them were the same ones behind 9/11, to simply go back and research documented fakery of 9/11 and then determine whether it's true that nearly 3000 died, because it has a lot of psychological power and is demoralizing to consider that these people actually killed nearly 3000 in cold blood and that the obvious Harley t-shirt guy actor (Mark Walsh) seems to have no problem with in future appearances such as a Facebook post joking about people saying he was involved in 9/11, if he were actually an accessory to mass murder before or after the fact.
I entirely agree with your last post fauxcapitalist. I don't think there were hundreds or thousands of actors, that's all. Like you, I doubt 3000 died, but figure some people probably did die - ones who decided not to evacuate for whatever reason or other for one. My friend was evacuated right away. I asked him where he was when the buildings fell and he said that he, with most of the other evacuated people, were walking across some bridge at the time. So they must have been evacuated pretty soon after the plane hit. He told me the bridge, but I've forgotten it since I'm not the most familiar with NYC even though I've been there probably a dozen times or so. I think I would have remembered if it was the Brooklyn bridge; so there must be some other bridge in that area.
I myself don't even think the Wile Coyote planes hit the buildings; and so I'm on board with the "fakery" business - just don't think there were hundreds of actors involved. I'm not on board with the Sandy Hook conspiracists since I haven't looked into it well enough and call bull on much they spout. The Boston marathon bombing looked fishy as hell to me though. I'm on the fence on both of those - leaning more towards seeing the Boston one as being more obviously fake.
Kapner comes off differently during these radio interviews. Instead of only giving a wily smile on his videos, he gives several wiley laughs.
ReplyDeleteNothing's changed since he was interviewed by George Whitehurst-Berry I think sometime back in 2008-2009.
I mentioned it on Charlie Giuliani's show and some chatters dismissed it, but to get Kapner on a GCN show three times with over 10,000 daily listeners all the way back then is a big deal, and despite some since concluding that he is working for the other side, it was a big deal at the time to have someone speaking so openly about the Jewish elite, on Alex Jones' own network.
And George even got a complaint for one of the interviews, but a week later, probably once a local ADL operative got tipped off about it, and nothing was ever done about it, since George had a serious conversation.
Kapner was giving a wily laugh all the way back then, which I wondered about. I suspect Kapner is legit, but who knows for sure. It's not as easy as someone dressing up the way he does and looking like Krusty the Klown meaning that you're working for the other side. He's apparently been a sincere Christian for awhile now, supposedly since the 70s, and he does seem to know a lot better theology than most Christians do.
Regarding the Bollyn interview, 25 minutes in, he talks about all these fake events happening every day now. Notice he said fake and not just false flag events.
ReplyDeleteThen, at 33 minutes, he says his book is unique, because he says who did 9/11 (true, compared to Richard Gage and Judy Wood, most prominently).
He correctly says it's the same group of people who were behind the Malaysian flight shootdown over Ukraine and Charlie Hebdo, but what about the means? Why would 9/11 not also have had a high degree of fakery as he's saying about all these later events?
This is a question not only to be asked of him, but most prominent alternative researchers who are now saying most or all of these big events of the past two years are faked, but still think that nearly 3000 people died on 9/11 and real drones were used, as opposed to big time video fakery, fake deaths and hundreds if not thousands of actors.
I had a friend who was working in a WTC tower at the time and he told me that he was evacuated from the building. I don't see where your "hundreds if not thousands of actors" crapola comes into play here. The buildings were evacuated and demolished. The people evacuated were not fake. The buildings being demolished was not fake. No doubt some people died in this operation - maybe 3000. I don't see where you're going with this, Jason.
ReplyDeleteI keep saying - the crisis actors are Jewish, and the operation is to have Jew vicsims. Gentiles OTOH are more than expendable, it is to exalt YHWH to dupe them into killing each other or simply kill them.
ReplyDelete....Consider Kapner (Milton)'s warning abourt the gentile divisons being amassed in Poland to fight other gentiles in Novorussia.....
ReplyDeleteWW1 WW2, Catholic v protestant, Sunni v Shia.... All driven by false flags and media hype
Did you ever get interviewed, Rodin? Wasn't Nick (I think that is his name) going to interview you on these things. I'd be interested to hear your take on things. I think you might take things a little far, but your posts on the Icke forum were always interesting to me. I probably read the whole thread of one of them about Jewish fakery (and nuclear bombs I think it was). I've always been suspicious of the nuclear bomb claims for the simple fact of all of the lies that are always spewed in the media about them. That doesn't prove to me that they're false of course; but I've always been a bit leery on the subject. Even while taking the subject (nuclear physics) in college.
ReplyDeleteKappner puts out some good info in his videos and names names but he is pro Putin and I have my suspicions that he is working for the kremlin ,novosti,Putin
ReplyDeleteOr someone like that he puts out so many professionals produced videos there has to be someone behind him
@ Blake
ReplyDeleteI was once interviewed on Radio Scotland and hated it lol. Not about this stuff obviously.... I think if I were to formalise some of my pet theories it would first be in the form of some sort of presentation - book or video channel is on my mind... And would focus on science....
matt, and despite that, Kapner keeps begging for money, and he even told Whitehurst-Berry that he barely had two cents to rub together, and asked him for a donation, too.
ReplyDeleteSince he's dressed up like a priest of sorts, he shouldn't have need for all kinds of money for his own living. I suppose I could give him the benefit of the doubt that he's donating whatever's left from his production costs and basic living expenses to charity.
He did personally respond to an email I sent him one time about an interview, so that made me feel better that he's not just constantly begging for money and not responding to anyone except the big guys.
I know Zap thinks he's working for the other side, but there are sometimes "oddballs" out there. If he was working for the other side, I would've expected him to start changing his message and putting out things like Alex Jones did, that Arabs own Hollywood. It's things like that that add up over all the years that point to being an agent.
He is definitely so supportive of Putin, telling us what a great hero he is. There's no way you get to that level, and especially with his KGB background, and not have some dirt on your hands. While some others have stated it as fact, I think it's definitely a question as to whether he was involved in some of the terrorist incidents done by Chechen separatists. No reason why Russian intelligence wouldn't play some of the same tricks the U.S.-Israeli cabal has been regularly doing now.
Another reason that makes me suspect Kapner is legit is that he criticizes the Austrian School of Economics and its support for usury.
ReplyDeleteHe initially pulled back that article and video after a lot of protest from a group of his supporters, but has since reconsidered for awhile now and has kept criticizing it.
blake, if you also don't accept the official 9/11 conspiracy, then you would perhaps think, as I do, that the timing of the building collapses were deliberate.
ReplyDeleteAnd as a result, I think they pulled the towers exactly when they wanted to, and not even a second early or late.
I fully expect that there were lots of real people there in the buildings that day, as the intent wasn't to pull the building right away. It would be very interesting to know when your friend got out, as if it was close to the time they told us that each of the towers collapsed, then it would show an intent to kill many of the remaining people.
Where I'm going with all this is documented fakery on that day, such as the "King Kong Man" who is taller than any documented human being who ever lived, as he's standing in the window in one video, or the "Falling Man," where the sides of the towers don't match up with what it would have to look like, and the flying birds in one "live" shot that suddenly all uniformly fly faster in the second half of the screen, or the 2500+ alleged victims who don't show up in the Social Security Death Index, despite a purported 75%+ accuracy rate.
And the figure of nearly 3000 -- it's around the number of those said to have died in the Pearl Harbor attacks, and 9/11 has been called a New Pearl Harbor.
I'm not saying most or none of the purported 3000 victims are real, I'm saying there may have been widespread fakery on different levels, and I am asking those prominent alternative researchers (Christopher Bollyn, Charles Giuliani and others) who have gone on the public record and said that these recent big events are fake, and that the same people behind them were the same ones behind 9/11, to simply go back and research documented fakery of 9/11 and then determine whether it's true that nearly 3000 died, because it has a lot of psychological power and is demoralizing to consider that these people actually killed nearly 3000 in cold blood and that the obvious Harley t-shirt guy actor (Mark Walsh) seems to have no problem with in future appearances such as a Facebook post joking about people saying he was involved in 9/11, if he were actually an accessory to mass murder before or after the fact.
I don't understand why Rense even has guests on his show because he constantly interrupts them.
ReplyDeleteHe is actually worse than Alex Jones or any other interviewer I've ever heard when it comes to interrupting his guests.
He just loves to hear himself talk and drone on about stuff he's either just repeated or what we already know.
I think that many times his guests have good inforamtion they want to get out but they can't because of his constant douchebagery interruptions.
I entirely agree with your last post fauxcapitalist. I don't think there were hundreds or thousands of actors, that's all. Like you, I doubt 3000 died, but figure some people probably did die - ones who decided not to evacuate for whatever reason or other for one. My friend was evacuated right away. I asked him where he was when the buildings fell and he said that he, with most of the other evacuated people, were walking across some bridge at the time. So they must have been evacuated pretty soon after the plane hit. He told me the bridge, but I've forgotten it since I'm not the most familiar with NYC even though I've been there probably a dozen times or so. I think I would have remembered if it was the Brooklyn bridge; so there must be some other bridge in that area.
ReplyDeleteI myself don't even think the Wile Coyote planes hit the buildings; and so I'm on board with the "fakery" business - just don't think there were hundreds of actors involved. I'm not on board with the Sandy Hook conspiracists since I haven't looked into it well enough and call bull on much they spout. The Boston marathon bombing looked fishy as hell to me though. I'm on the fence on both of those - leaning more towards seeing the Boston one as being more obviously fake.