JDoes Netanyahu believe his own propaganda? "If that is the case it would have to be said that he is not only beyond reason but deluded to the point of clinical insanity," asserts Alan Hart, former BBC Mideast correspondent and back-channel Middle East peace negotiator.
In this interview we discuss Alan's new article Who and what is the real Bibi Netanyahu? Alan argues that Zionism always intended to ethnically cleanse Palestine, but that the "liberal, reasonable Zionists" have lied about it, while a few genocidal maniacs like Jabotinsky at least told the truth. Thus the whole Zionist project is, in essence one big lie: a genocide program that dare not speak its name. The problem is that when you keep repeating lies, you may come to believe them – risking clinical insanity, as exemplified by the current Israeli Prime Minister, who is taking over the US Congress today.
Will backlash over Bibi Nutty-yahoo's chutzpah – and such Israeli false flags as 9/11 – stop the Zionists before they finish their genocide? Could Palestinians and Israelis live together in prosperity and equality in a post-Zionist Palestine? And what would it take to make that happen? Tune in and hear what Alan Hart thinks.
And check out my new article:
Top ten reasons Bibi's speech is a good idea
Kevin's blog
TruthJihad.com
NoLiesRadio
64k CF Download
Kevin Barret has Social Justice Warrior stamped on his smug looking face
ReplyDeleteGood to hear that Hart recognizes and admits that the two main WTC buildings on 9/11 didn't come down due to being hit by planes and fire.
ReplyDeleteAlso revealing how he said that BBC won't have him on anymore not because of his stance on Israel and Zionism, but because of 9/11.
35 minutes in, Hart says he thinks the Charlie Hebdo attack was a one-off genuine case of fanatical, lunatic, Muslim operation, and it's golden to hear him in the next minute say "oh, really?" when Barrett mentions the video of the policeman being shot with a blank and not a real bullet.
Good that he didn't get all defensive and admitted that it's difficult to tell exactly what happened in this situations. If he spent as much time researching these other events as much as some do, he'd soon privately admit they are also false flags, and even faked to a big extent.
And near the end, Hart makes the excellent point that Muslim scholars from across the world should get together and decide on interpreting Islam for the modern world.
So far that hasn't happened, and it's because there is a big resistance among many to alter rulings that were made in the several hundred years after the death of Muhammad.
The level of naivete on both sides was simply astonishing. From butchered historical quotes to false flags and to the definitions of Zionism vs Judaism, it resembled a whitewashed version of Zionwhores.
ReplyDeleteThe level of naivete on both sides was simply astonishing. From butchered historical quotes to false flags and to the definitions of Zionism vs Judaism, it resembled a whitewashed version of Zionwhores.
ReplyDelete