Dr. Duke had an amazing show full of background information necessary
to understand what is happening in the world and how we can change it.
He went into the history of Zio-America's attack on Iraq, noting that
Saddam's Iraq had been an ally and proxy of the United States during the
Iran-Iraq War. In fact, Saddam had cleared his intentions to invade
Kuwait in 1990 with the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie.
Regarding Syria, Dr. Duke went over the Zionist ties with the Islamic
extremist groups like ISIS that are trying to take over control of that
country from the moderate, secular President Assad, a Western educated
eye surgeon who has the support of most Syrians, including Syrian
Christians.
Then
Dr. Duke questioned the sanity of Christian Zionists who blindly
support Israel and all things Jewish, when Israel has ethnically
cleansed Christians from the Holy Land and the Jewish Talmud claims that
Jewish magicians have conjured up Jesus and are boiling him in
excrement. Moreover, Jewish supremacists in the United States are behind
the attack on Christian morality that Christian Zionists want to think
they hold dear. Finally, Dr. Duke and Dr. Slattery discuss the results
of the British election, which can be viewed as a total victory for
Zionism despite a rising tide of frustration with Jewish rule.
Iranians are good people Rupertti. They haven't started any wars and don't go around terrorizing the planet. It is not traitorous or foolish to support Iran. Russians are a good people too with a great culture and heritage. Saddam was the CIA proxy who became disobediant to the ones who put him in power through a bloody coup. Religion in general is the opiate used to control the masses and stagnate evolvement of the intellect.
Actually there is one jew in the counsel of clerics. They are not led by Jews dummy. Although Islam might as well be Judaism like christianity. Regardless of how friendly he is to jewry, Putin in is playing a game of chess. Don't underestimate.
One of the biggest propagandistic lies that came out of the Jewish Zionist supremacist drumbeat for war against Iraq had to do with the scare story that Saddam might give nuclear weapons to terrorists.
First, that presupposed that Saddam even had the ability to acquire nuclear weapons, but beyond that, it should've been rejected as outright impossible from the beginning based on a personality profile that a layperson can apply based on knowing a little bit about him, that he had a huge ego and would NEVER let anyone else get credit for acquiring and using such technology, and he would paint a mortal target on his back if it was ever proven he gave such technology, as this nuclear material can be traced back to its place of origin.
Regarding Khomeini, specifically, I didn't think much about it until the past year, but his re-emergence on the scene of Iranian politics, was suspicious, given that he was living in a villa in France, and they just let him go on a plane to Iran and there was nothing in a psychological profile indicating that he would do what he ended up doing? Unless they wanted him to do what they thought he would, if not openly using him as an agent.
Also, despite an Islamic basis for good treatment of non-subversive and peaceful Jews, it is at least a bit suspicious to me that Jews got such good treatment in Iran compared to some other minority groups, especially in the case of Zoroastrians, whose religion pre-dates the official pronouncement of Islam.
On the other hand, David Rockefeller was annoyed by the treatment that the Shah got after being ousted, so it's hard to say for sure, but that may have been more of a case of Rockefeller's love of tyrants he's made big connections with.
It was Khomeini who was a proxy of the Jews. I think that th ones praising Russia and Iran are fooled by the KGB or they are traitors.
ReplyDeleteAnd they are bashing Saddam which was the one that the Jews destroyed
Iranians are good people Rupertti. They haven't started any wars and don't go around terrorizing the planet. It is not traitorous or foolish to support Iran. Russians are a good people too with a great culture and heritage. Saddam was the CIA proxy who became disobediant to the ones who put him in power through a bloody coup. Religion in general is the opiate used to control the masses and stagnate evolvement of the intellect.
ReplyDeleteIran and the Russia is led by the Jews. Not by the Russians or the Iranians.
ReplyDeleteActually there is one jew in the counsel of clerics. They are not led by Jews dummy. Although Islam might as well be Judaism like christianity. Regardless of how friendly he is to jewry, Putin in is playing a game of chess. Don't underestimate.
ReplyDeleteOne of the biggest propagandistic lies that came out of the Jewish Zionist supremacist drumbeat for war against Iraq had to do with the scare story that Saddam might give nuclear weapons to terrorists.
ReplyDeleteFirst, that presupposed that Saddam even had the ability to acquire nuclear weapons, but beyond that, it should've been rejected as outright impossible from the beginning based on a personality profile that a layperson can apply based on knowing a little bit about him, that he had a huge ego and would NEVER let anyone else get credit for acquiring and using such technology, and he would paint a mortal target on his back if it was ever proven he gave such technology, as this nuclear material can be traced back to its place of origin.
Regarding Khomeini, specifically, I didn't think much about it until the past year, but his re-emergence on the scene of Iranian politics, was suspicious, given that he was living in a villa in France, and they just let him go on a plane to Iran and there was nothing in a psychological profile indicating that he would do what he ended up doing? Unless they wanted him to do what they thought he would, if not openly using him as an agent.
ReplyDeleteAlso, despite an Islamic basis for good treatment of non-subversive and peaceful Jews, it is at least a bit suspicious to me that Jews got such good treatment in Iran compared to some other minority groups, especially in the case of Zoroastrians, whose religion pre-dates the official pronouncement of Islam.
On the other hand, David Rockefeller was annoyed by the treatment that the Shah got after being ousted, so it's hard to say for sure, but that may have been more of a case of Rockefeller's love of tyrants he's made big connections with.