Gilad Atzmon vs. political correctness: "I am a reactionary essentialist"
Gilad Atzmon, author of the new A to Zion,
one of the great minds and great musicians of our time, has been called
a lot of things: "Self-hating Jew," "self-hating Israeli,"
"anti-Semite," "skinhead nazi sympathizer" (and plenty of other "unlovely terms").
What he really is, is a philosopher – not the phony academic variety,
but the real thing – a gadfly like Socrates who commits the ultimate sin
(according to the neocons) of seeking and uttering the truth in the
public square. He's also calling himself a "reactionary essentialist,"
the two worst insults that a mindless liberal academic can throw at
another mindless liberal academic.
In this interview Gilad explains how various issues or institutions
(Palestine, the 2008 financial implosion, big banking in general,
Hollywood, false flags, Pam Geller) are becoming "Jewish problems" – a
situation that has, in the past, occasionally led the goyim to throw the
Jews under the bus. As anti-Jewish animosity grows, Gilad suggests,
Jews (as a tribe or collective) attempt to monopolize both sides of each
dispute in order to keep a lid on the situation. Examples: The liberal
Southern Poverty Law Center, a spin-off of the Zionist propaganda organ
ADL, attacks ultra-Zionist genocide advocate Pam Geller as a racist;
anti-Zionist Jews "speaking as Jews" take over the pro-Palestine
movement; many liberal Jews including Soros support the Occupy movement
against the (disproportionately Jewish) banksters (such as Soros); and
so on. Even the Cold War, according to Gilad, was a "Jewish problem" in
that the disproportionately Jewish communists battled the
disproportionately Jewish banksters who dominated capitalism. When the
Cold War ended, neocon Jews staged 9/11 and created the "War on Terror"
(i.e. the war on Israel's Islamic enemies) to replace it…while liberal
Jews set limits on permissible discourse opposing/exposing it. Those who
transgress those limits, as I have, are drummed out of
(Jewish-dominated) established institutions, endlessly smeared and
defamed, and denied the opportunity to earn a living.
So what exactly new does Atzmon say that we gentiles haven't known for years?. Is it not a case of being beguiled by a Jew saying what we want to hear, thereby having more power just because he is a Jew that is saying it....
Have you seen these Anthony Lawson 6 videos Henry?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWDz5xw8PKU
Atzmon is accused of "Denying the Holocaust" with positions like he takes there. I myself would rather stay away from any and all Jewish influence on the matter (anf others). And therefore I don't recommend Atzmon. But those videos are interesting.
As for Atzmon not ripping apart the official Holocaust narrative, he indicated why in this very episode, and it has to do with laws in most European countries with jail time if you publicly do so, and being a musician who occasionally travels outside of the UK, he could be one of the individuals they decide to charge if he speaks out and travels elsewhere in Europe.
He made a very important point about the insertion of Jewish critics into various things like the economic meltdown of 2008, 9/11, and even about Zionism, so that it attempts to take the heat off of Jews, overall, and diverts the discussion into one about a disagreement among Jews.
It got me thinking in a new way, that someone like Karen Hudes isn't just out there to put out nonsense and draw attention away from the Jewish element to the Vatican, Jesuits and "coneheads," but it's also designed to show that there is (false) Jewish opposition to Jewish criminality, though it is of course presented as non-ethnic corruption, like the Alex Jones playbook calls for of calling them globalists, and (falsely) saying that the Japanese ruling elite is just as much a part of the top ruling elite as Jews are (false, in terms of overall significance, despite some Japanese elite being involved).
One thing I really noticed, is that unlike in Barrett's own monologues, or in most other interviews, he lets Atzmon go on about Jews as opposed to Zionists or Jewish Zionists, as Barrett personally likes to talk about Zionists, even when it's more than Zionists or even Jewish Zionists.
Perhaps he feels comfortable with letting Atzmon speak as he wants, since he is ethnically Jewish himself, despite claiming he's not Jewish, so he can get away with it more.
So what exactly new does Atzmon say that we gentiles haven't known for years?. Is it not a case of being beguiled by a Jew saying what we want to hear, thereby having more power just because he is a Jew that is saying it....
ReplyDeleteWell said Mick.
ReplyDeleteLet Atzmon, who doesn't deny the Holohoax, go back to Israel and shit in his own backyard.
Have you seen these Anthony Lawson 6 videos Henry?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWDz5xw8PKU
Atzmon is accused of "Denying the Holocaust" with positions like he takes there. I myself would rather stay away from any and all Jewish influence on the matter (anf others). And therefore I don't recommend Atzmon. But those videos are interesting.
As for Atzmon not ripping apart the official Holocaust narrative, he indicated why in this very episode, and it has to do with laws in most European countries with jail time if you publicly do so, and being a musician who occasionally travels outside of the UK, he could be one of the individuals they decide to charge if he speaks out and travels elsewhere in Europe.
ReplyDeleteHe made a very important point about the insertion of Jewish critics into various things like the economic meltdown of 2008, 9/11, and even about Zionism, so that it attempts to take the heat off of Jews, overall, and diverts the discussion into one about a disagreement among Jews.
It got me thinking in a new way, that someone like Karen Hudes isn't just out there to put out nonsense and draw attention away from the Jewish element to the Vatican, Jesuits and "coneheads," but it's also designed to show that there is (false) Jewish opposition to Jewish criminality, though it is of course presented as non-ethnic corruption, like the Alex Jones playbook calls for of calling them globalists, and (falsely) saying that the Japanese ruling elite is just as much a part of the top ruling elite as Jews are (false, in terms of overall significance, despite some Japanese elite being involved).
One thing I really noticed, is that unlike in Barrett's own monologues, or in most other interviews, he lets Atzmon go on about Jews as opposed to Zionists or Jewish Zionists, as Barrett personally likes to talk about Zionists, even when it's more than Zionists or even Jewish Zionists.
ReplyDeletePerhaps he feels comfortable with letting Atzmon speak as he wants, since he is ethnically Jewish himself, despite claiming he's not Jewish, so he can get away with it more.