They discussed the manipulation of blacks by Jews, such as the Black Lives Matter organization, which promotes the Jewish social agenda, incites blacks against whites and against the police, and ultimately has done incredible harm to the black community that can be measured in a skyrocketing murder rate in black neighborhoods.
Davids' site
Rense Archive
56k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Nice show.
ReplyDeleteI like the way zapoper and foon1e are formatting the dates for the shows in the titles, like this: 2015.08.21 - The other posters should learn from them., they set an excellent example.
I gave up listening to Mike Rivero a few years ago, but he is having Duke as a guest on the coming tuesday show, so will give it a go.
ReplyDeleteToday Duke had Anglin on - having listened to Duke on Radio 314, I think Anglin as guest was an anti-Jones psyop ploy.
Jones knows Anglin organised a campaign against him, and this campaign must have been an irritant. Duke must know this too. This was a clever way of gnawing at the Jonestein's ego - so that if Duke gets on his show again (AJ promised he would and that he could debate his jewish boss) Jones may lose it. Here's hoping
Oh - on the 314 ahow DFuke told of his psychological tactics to get the message across.
ReplyDeleteJust as I predicted. As if Duke's KKK grand wizard past wasn't already the absolute worst public image anyone could possibly have, which the mainstream always uses to broad-brush anyone who associates with Duke as nothing but far-right loons who want to lynch blacks and non-white people from the nearest tree, he then goes on Red Ice Radio for 3 hours to taint their image forever with the wider online conspiracy crowd for good and brings this Anglin clown on, whose website has about as much to do with the true ideals of National Socialism (it really functions as limited hangout against anyone studying further the real aims of National Socialism by putting a counterfeit "skinhead" and "Christian Identity friendly" brand of it in front of the internet WN public) as Justin Bieber has to do with music. A totally transparent move to broad-brush and destroy the reputations of the entire conspiracy community, all one million minuscule percentage of them, from Alex Jones on down, by a guy who never talks about any conspiracies, none at all, except the formerly clandestine and now out-in-the-open Jew race-war against European whites and their cultures.
ReplyDeleteAlso, whether Duke is an agent doing this deliberately or not, his KKK-connected image is being used to broad-brush all White Nationalists into one camp and dismiss them all in ONE LUMP SYMBOL. Eustace Mullins thought he was an agent but useful idiocy works just the same and hence why those who want to discredit the White Nationalist cause or the anti-multi-culturalist cause go to Duke as the be-all/end-all representative of these factions.
ReplyDeleteDuke has gained back much credibility, but having Andre Anglin on i think hurts it a bit
ReplyDeletebut i still think there is enough real populist anger right now to have people finally hear his message and look past his past people are starting to figure out the game they will eventually question why he is so demonized by the main stream as they are becoming more and more disillusioned with the mainstream every day
just look at Trumps poll numbers
not sure what country you are in negentropic but here in the JEW S of A shit is getting really intolerable with the influx of 3rd worlders it has got to point where even
everyday liberal citizens are noting there is a problem
I think Negentropic and Andrea Mitchell make some great and valid points. Here's my take, not that anyone cares, but please tell me what you think..
ReplyDeleteI personally really like Duke's videos (I'm sure that most people aware of the reality of the JWO do, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, etc.) IMO, he really does a great job in helping to expose the agenda of the JWO. I also think Duke is generally a pretty nice guy (I don't know him of course), that carries himself well, is polite and articulate, that does really care about the JWO, not just in their war against the whites/Europeans, but against Gentiles in general, including of course the Palestinians, and the Iranians/Persians, etc. Also, Duke does not go down in the "gutter" so to speak, and is very classy in this sense, not using words that do not fit people of his stature; words such as groids, nigg*r, sp*cs, muds, subhuman so and do, k*ke, etc. (Unfortunately "some" other WNs such as Anglin - correct me if I'm wrong - and others, do use these gutter types of words that make the Truth Movement, and/or the Truth Movement that are also anti-ZOG or pro-WN, or even just anti-zionist look kind of bad, IMO. And maybe Duke should not be talking to guys such as this... Another thing I thought of is that "some" WNs - such as Anglin and others - and Duke ALSO wisely, IMO DOES NOT do this - call and refer to themselves as "racists," "anti-semites," hell, even so-called "white supremacists," although I could be wrong about the last one)
Now, like Duke or not, IMO, Duke could have (I thought he said this in the past, maybe not?) in the Jonesbaum debate (and IMO, he did a pretty good job) apologized or said he was sorry or that it was a mistake to have been involved with the KKK, period, end of story. He could have said that he was young and naive, and that in the south (NO) at the time, there were not a lot of outlets for pro-European nationalists, etc. But made it very, very clear that it was a mistake that he committed in his youth and that he totally regrets it, etc. (whether he really has such sentiments about his past doesn't really matter I guess). He could have said that as he got older, he started to see the light, seeing all gentiles as brothers in humanity in a certain sense, and that all races and ethic groups deserve to have their own interests heard and looked after, but he realized that ZOG, or the joo led PTB/Elites, etc., were trying to cause division amongst the races, using divide and rule, etc. (I believe he did mention much of this, and truly does believe it, but without saying that it was a mistake or that he truly regretted to have been in the KKK). Once he says that he truly regrets and is sorry to have been involved with the KKK, he can than get this monkey off his back, so to speak, and every time a joo puppet throws this in his face, he could then say "I'm on record as condemning this part of my past; have you ever condemned the current day joo-zionist terrorists in occupied Palestine for committing some of the worst war crimes, terrorism and human rights violations in history, something that they are still doing right now at this moment with the US taxpayer's money?" (in fact he could have also mentioned that he later realized that the KKK was a sort of Judeo-Masonic or Illuminati based organization at least to a certain extent, and while largely true, this would have helped to get more of the non-joo wise "conspiracytards" that follow AJ, to be even more so on his side... not that I don't personally believe in conspiracies, I do).
@Negentropic,
ReplyDeleteExcellent points made all around!
I wasn't aware of Duke's latest interview with Red Ice Radio (will check it out). But have you noticed that Lana, IMO, is seemingly less open about many subjects and true conspiracies then Henrik? I mean, it seems that Lana almost only focuses on white nationalism, including the war against the whites from various ZOG forces, the hypocrisy of non-whites against whites, etc. Now, these are all worthy and important things to talk about or discuss, and Lana is a pretty good interviewer, and has a down to earth personality, etc., however, Henrik talks about these issues at times, but ALSO talks about many OTHER issues and conspiracies, and IMO, doesn't just have on the same kinds of guests. Sorry, if I'm maybe generalizing a bit. I would hope this isn't the case, but I wonder if Lana also agrees with Duke and believes the JMSM account of the 911 false flag, and maybe others? (I don't think she would be so naive as to believe the official story... However, the fact that Duke apparently does believe the "official" ZOG account - at least that's what he says? - is pretty fricken' hard to believe though!)
That said, maybe Henrik has been trying to specifically have this type of format. After all, it is very successful of course...
Red Ice should be very careful because they didn't gain their substantial audience by being White Nationalists. They gained it by being regular conspiracy buffs who went deeper into things than your average Alex Jones and Jeff Rense and David Icke. They want to KEEP as much as their original audience as they can and slowly teach them why multi-culturalism, based on anti-nature egalitarianism does not make any sense. Most of the Red Ice audience will become anti-multicultralist if taught correctly but they will never become White Nationalists or what they consider "White Supremacy" advocates and "racists." The case can be argued effectively without even bringing up race WHILE NOT IGNORING that the races are different and these differences do affect culture. They already lost their I-Tunes account just for bringing Dennis Wise of "Adolf Hitler, the Greatest Story Never Told" on. But that was worth it. To lose even more of their audience for the sake of people like Duke and his ilk isn't. It's not even good strategy for fighting their cause of keeping the Jew-run Swedish government from FORCING Swedes to accept mass Third-World and non-European immigration.
ReplyDeleteMulticulturalism itself can be easily argued against without even factoring in race.
ReplyDeleteMulti-culturalism = Multi-standardism = confusion and the erosion of all proper standards of excellence into a lowest common denominator. Plus, inevitable lack of understanding and proper communication between the different cultures and hence lots of time wasted that would not have been with people of your own culture of those closest to your own culture.
The standards of behavior that must be adhered to in order to conceive of and build European civilization and all the modern conveniences within it, are a unique set of high standards that more-or-less work. The loss of these standards = the loss of European civilization and the loss of all the creativity that produced the products of this civilization.
Therefore, any person who admires European civilization and its products and wants to move there, has to meet the high standards of that culture and not seek to lower it IN ANY WAY. If that person does not consider those standards worth keeping, then he has no business being there and will receive, in return for his disrespect, the disrespect he deserves back.
If all individuals are made 'equal before the law' to pursue the happiness of their inevitably unequal results, then there will always be a 'power imbalance' even in the fairest, most libertarian society of win-win contracts and general goodwill, simply because no two human beings are equal and hence no two groups comprised of unequal individuals, no two results of any group endeavors and ultimately no two cultures. When a group or collective of unequal individuals achieve a consistency of behavior that tends towards the more or less homogeneous because they all adhere to certain basic principles, then these wealth-creating good-for-me compendium of moral choices results in what is called THEIR cultural achievement.
When a person also observes that groups of unequal individuals whose behavior tends to be far more consistent than those of other groups are of similar genetic background and decides to become a 'racist' by considering the preservation of these genes an important factor, he or she is just making a free choice for better or worse and is not engaged in any coercive activity. If a large portion of an entire society makes similar free choices and decides to become 'racist,' then that's still not institutionalized 'violence' but simply an aggregate of free choices. It is only when initiation of force against individuals is 'institutionalized' that injustice or a violation of the inalienable natural right to free choice occurs and to initiate it in 'collective retaliation and collective punishment' is, in principle, as wrong as shooting the residents of an entire neighborhood for the crimes of a handful. It is coercion that is always the problem and not the free choice whether to factor in genetics into your thinking or not.
Negentropic Chronicles – Episode 3 –
https://archive.org/download/NegentropicChronicles003/Negentropic%20Chronicles%20003.mp3
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1062565996#post1062565996