December 10, 2015

Stanley Kubrick Confesses to Faking Moon Landings

An  Interview Filmed 3 days before His death in England has surfaced online after a 15 year embargo on it's publication has expired. Now you can see and hear Kubrick himself admitting to being the director of NASA's original hoax. Enjoy the Movie!



kub final v master 76 hd 66

11 comments:

  1. Hallelujah! Please tell me this video, itself, is not faked! I don't know who the interviewer is, but it seems as though he would not have been the candidate to receive such disclosure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The interviewer is apparently some bloke named T. Patrick Murray. Probably a fake interview. A pity if so. Time will tell, but we all knew Apollo was fake as shit and done by Kubrick anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR4pf6pp1kQ

    At the end of the fake interview, the interviewer is coaching the fake Kubrick
    on what to say and how to respond to his questions. A hoax about a hoax, is this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks to the link to the "Re-edited" stitched together version. It's open to interpretation though - i saw a tired Kubrick - who died 3 days after the recording - being queried by the interviewer - not directed. Lots of anonymous people calling it fake out there. But what would the US Government/NASA gain from faking an interview that blows their lies to pieces? I have done a facial analysis and Kubricks moles on the left side of his face match the guy in the vid. Need more investigation into the events surrounding the release of the vid i think...

    ReplyDelete
  5. foont1e: "But what would the US Government/NASA gain from faking an interview that blows their lies to pieces?"

    Label their critics stupid/crazy/evil is one tactic used against the hoax slayers:

    http://thewhitenetwork-archive.com/2012/07/03/stupidcrazyevil/


    ReplyDelete
  6. Check the ears.....Quick someone call Dallas Goldbug. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  7. foon1e: No need for sarcasm, as nobody wanted this to be true more than me.
    The fake Kubrick was believable enough for my untrained eyes & ears, but the interviewer sounded too much like a rank amateur, as to be believed and I simply
    can't reconcile the coached answers at the end of the video. However, prior to the
    ending, I was still elated.

    In addition, why does it have to be the US government or NASA faking this interview?
    It seems perfectly logical it's just a shill muddying the waters.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No sarcasm was intended SW. I merely pointed out the link you provided was to a cobbled together edit culled from the main video file,created in haste. The(Badly) edited Original Video had been an ongoing project for the Interviewer since 2014 - when the 15 year embargo expired. Your point about the interviewer sounding like a rank amateur? I would posit 15 years ago he actually was! His appearances on Rense and other shows since illustrate someone who has grown in confidence and public speaking.
    As I said, I compared the video of "Kubrick" to freely available photos of Kubrick taken during the last month of his life. All facial marks,moles and musculature match exactly the Image in the video. And as you admitted, His voice matches too.

    Time and diligence investigation will confirm or deny the provenance of the video. I am loath to rush to conclusions like so many anonymous critics have done out there; because like yourself, I fervently wish this proves to be genuine. It would be a gift to everyone who's been labelled a "Conspiracy Theorist" before. Let's see how it plays out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. that's not fucking Stanley Kub

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.