In hindsight, after Sandy Hook, Boston, and some of these more recent events that smack of crisis acting and fake "witnesses," I wonder if Haskell is legit.
He may be, and even probably is, as the "Underwear Bomber" event may have and even probably did take place the way we were told, with a fake bomb that wouldn't blow up the airplane.
This is where I disagree with the ones I call hyperfakery promoters who claim that these events are completely fabricated, to the point of most or all reported events not even taking place.
The only really questionable thing is Haskell being interviewed on CNN, as on 9/11, they had fake witnesses on the big TV networks telling their phony tales.
Since no one was said to have died, the event probably did take place, and it practically doesn't matter if Haskell is legit or not, because he didn't serve some big disinfo purpose unlike 9/11 witnesses, as we know that obviously the kid shouldn't have been allowed on the plane with some sort of real bomb that they allegedly couldn't have detected with the metal detectors and he just helped to alert us to the fishiness of the story anyway, even if there was no one else to tell us that the kid supposedly got on the plane with the help of someone else, without a valid passport.
I lean toward Kurt being legit - always thought he sounded honest...
But, how does a guy loose his career, spend two years investigating - no pay - then ex pat to another country & basically hang out & not work - but still survive?
In hindsight, after Sandy Hook, Boston, and some of these more recent events that smack of crisis acting and fake "witnesses," I wonder if Haskell is legit.
ReplyDeleteHe may be, and even probably is, as the "Underwear Bomber" event may have and even probably did take place the way we were told, with a fake bomb that wouldn't blow up the airplane.
This is where I disagree with the ones I call hyperfakery promoters who claim that these events are completely fabricated, to the point of most or all reported events not even taking place.
The only really questionable thing is Haskell being interviewed on CNN, as on 9/11, they had fake witnesses on the big TV networks telling their phony tales.
Since no one was said to have died, the event probably did take place, and it practically doesn't matter if Haskell is legit or not, because he didn't serve some big disinfo purpose unlike 9/11 witnesses, as we know that obviously the kid shouldn't have been allowed on the plane with some sort of real bomb that they allegedly couldn't have detected with the metal detectors and he just helped to alert us to the fishiness of the story anyway, even if there was no one else to tell us that the kid supposedly got on the plane with the help of someone else, without a valid passport.
I lean toward Kurt being legit - always thought he sounded honest...
ReplyDeleteBut, how does a guy loose his career, spend two years investigating - no pay - then ex pat to another country & basically hang out & not work - but still survive?
Shit, I don't know, but I still think he's legit.