The video seems to be from a different source which was probably higher in resolution. It seems to have been transcoded down to the same resolution as the original one but with a higher bit rate. The audio is slightly better too.
We are still left with the Hardcore Henry low resolution version.
Full Specs Of Original Video
General
Complete name : Full Video New zealand Christchurch Mosque Shooting.mp4
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media / Version 2
Codec ID : mp42
File size : 77.4 MiB
Duration : 16mn 55s
Overall bit rate : 639 Kbps
Encoded date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Tagged date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : Baseline@L3.0
Format settings, CABAC : No
Format settings, ReFrames : 1 frame
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Duration : 16mn 55s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 540 Kbps
Width : 640 pixels
Height : 352 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16/9
Frame rate mode : Variable
Frame rate : 30.000 fps
Resolution : 24 bits
Colorimetry : 4:2:0
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.080
Stream size : 65.4 MiB (85%)
Title : ISO Media file produced by Google Inc. Created on: 03/15/2019.
Writing library : x264 core 155 r2901 7d0ff22
Encoded date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Tagged date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Audio
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format version : Version 4
Format profile : LC
Format settings, SBR : No
Codec ID : 40
Duration : 16mn 55s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 96.0 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : L R
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
Resolution : 16 bits
Stream size : 11.6 MiB (15%)
Title : ISO Media file produced by Google Inc. Created on: 03/15/2019.
Encoded date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Tagged date : UTC 2019-03-15 09:27:52
Full Specs Of Updated Video
General
Complete name : Full Video ChristchurchV2.mp4
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media
Codec ID : isom
File size : 318 MiB
Duration : 16mn 55s
Overall bit rate : 2 624 Kbps
Writing application : Lavf57.56.101
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L3.0
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Duration : 16mn 55s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 2 500 Kbps
Width : 648 pixels
Height : 360 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16/9
Frame rate mode : Variable
Frame rate : 30.000 fps
Resolution : 24 bits
Colorimetry : 4:2:0
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.357
Stream size : 302 MiB (95%)
Writing library : x264 core 148 r2748 97eaef2
Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=3 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=hex / subme=7 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=11 / lookahead_threads=1 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=1 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=40 / rc=abr / mbtree=1 / bitrate=2500 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00
Audio
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format version : Version 4
Format profile : LC
Format settings, SBR : No
Codec ID : 40
Duration : 16mn 55s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 122 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 128 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Resolution : 16 bits
Stream size : 14.7 MiB (5%)
Thanks to Ognir for the Polish URL in the comment section
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete@ Red Orchid. I just downloaded it successfully and apparently others did so too. The problem is on your end. Try a different browser, change your ip etc.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYep slightly clearer images
ReplyDeleteNo surprise that they have released another copy. The first edition was pre-recorded and judging by the wet Tarmac(it didn't rain that day) probably at least a week before. THE VIDEO WAS NOT STREAMED LIVE and was edited before it was released.
ReplyDeleteMissing shells is the least of the errors in this staged event.
Why does the proprietor of this website wish that the shooting was real???
It looks to me like someone just re-encoded the "updated" version at a much higher bitrate to make it look like there was a better version. I don't see much of a quality difference between the two. I have been working with video encoding since divx first came out. If the 540 kbps video was created from the 2500 kbps video then you would expect the 2500 kbps to be much better quality. The evidence suggests the opposite.
ReplyDeleteAfter looking at the slightly higher res version, you are able to see all the casings lying around with more detail, however if you switch back to smaller versions, the casings are still there, only this time you know what to look for
ReplyDeleteIt's not really high res because the perpetrator only added 8 pixels to the vertical and horizontal and they used the smaller file as the source. You can't ever get better quality than what you started with, but you can re-encode something at a much higher bitrate and end up with something similar quality only extremely inefficient with space. That is what occurred here.
ReplyDeleteBTW, I got my copy from the Daily Stormer link right after the event. The file is named:
ReplyDeleteStreamed from my GoPro with https -_live4.io_v #LIVE4gopro-2350426065176752.mp4
And it is 64.8 MB
So there seems to be different versions going around. I have always been able to see the spent casings in this video.
After some digging around on the internet it seems that the 64.8 MB file with 493 kbps video and 648x360 res is the real original file.
ReplyDeleteMami's "original file" seems to have 8 pixels on the horizontal and vertical removed (640x352)and re-encoded to 540 kbps.
Mami's "updated file" seems to keep the original resolution but re-encoded to 2500 kbps.
All three of these have what I would consider equal video quality. There just isn't much of a difference except in the efficiency of the encode.
Yeah. After comparing the three videos again, I have to say that I think that you are right. I guess I was hallucinating a better quality yesterday. lol.
ReplyDeleteOh well.