joint fighting tem"?- Against WHOM? Who's the "Enemy"?
Whit it's THE People! The Nobodies, the poor peasants of foreign countries. And by golly, the U.S./Commnunists/ Corp/jews are going to bet the @#%** out of them, until they accept their slavery!!!
Holy smokes the host starts off by stating the F-15 was designed as the multirole aircraft and the F-16 as a pure fighter when the exact opposite is the case. The F-15 was designed as an air superiority fighter (Strike Eagle came later) and the F-16 as a multirole aircraft. He continues with the misassumption gaffs which could have been avoided with 15 minutes of Wikipedia such as the AV-8B Harrier being a STOL only aircraft (VTOL uses more fuel which is why it isn't used on assault carriers)and the AWACS dome as a radio transmitter. It is an aerodynamically optimized radar dome. I credit the guest for gently correcting and tap dancing around these idiotic gaffs. The host is spot on with the politics but there technical details, whew lad.
ReplyDeletejoint fighting tem"?- Against WHOM? Who's the "Enemy"?
Whit it's THE People! The Nobodies, the poor peasants of foreign countries.
And by golly, the U.S./Commnunists/ Corp/jews are going to bet the @#%** out of them, until they accept their slavery!!!
Holy smokes the host starts off by stating the F-15 was designed as the multirole aircraft and the F-16 as a pure fighter when the exact opposite is the case. The F-15 was designed as an air superiority fighter (Strike Eagle came later) and the F-16 as a multirole aircraft. He continues with the misassumption gaffs which could have been avoided with 15 minutes of Wikipedia such as the AV-8B Harrier being a STOL only aircraft (VTOL uses more fuel which is why it isn't used on assault carriers)and the AWACS dome as a radio transmitter. It is an aerodynamically optimized radar dome. I credit the guest for gently correcting and tap dancing around these idiotic gaffs. The host is spot on with the politics but there technical details, whew lad.
ReplyDeleteBasically, basically, basically, definitely, definitely, definitely....
ReplyDelete