Presidential 'debates' aren't debates at all - they're joint press conferences This kind of format promotes the use of candidates' focus-group tested messaging, "one-liners and canned mini-speeches." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52407.htm http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1101581137416&ca=f7a541da-5c6c-4dec-b552-bdbde76a1432
Canada, oh Canada! how I love the corporation of Canada.
It's just commerce, no more, no less. Look to the Bills of Exchange Act, the oldest and earliest, as the most recent, 1984 maybe, defines a bank differently, but I doubt it has royal accent.
The Bills of Exchange Act, I suggest, is the Number One Act in all corporations posing as nations.
"however you swim in their sea" Yes we do, and they have brought Admiralty Law onto the but we can too, "walk on water" as the parable states when we interpret the "script" accurately. Remedy is in the Law, Natural Law, not legal statutes.
Arguing is dishonourable, which is why lawyers and Corporate Courts encourage it. I have lost by walking in. "Settle with your brother / neighbour before you go to Court, if you go to court, be prepared to go to jail" I paraphrase. I have shown I cannot act with honour, and settle out of court.
Hello Schafers and Alison Chabloz! Conditional acceptance is honourable. I accept your claim subject to you providing admissible affadavit evidence to unconditionally support your claim. Look to Graham Hart's recent experience and writings.
Look at the picture that CBC chose for that YT video. Bernier is a NAZI. LOL
ReplyDeleteThe Bank of Canada by the way is still the people's bank. It's not a private entity like the federal reserve but it behave as if it is.
ReplyDelete"Its time we had a none of the above option on the ballot."
ReplyDeleteEspecially if they force us to vote as they are talking about.
Very well explained Chain.
ReplyDeleteIt is an illusion but I would argue that the said illusion is illegal.
If I could effectively argue in the first place that is. LOL
Is Canada too - behind the curtain - controlled by a clique of greasy Jewdaist/Globalist communist bastards ?
ReplyDeleteThanks for infos
Or is it just an illusion ?
ReplyDeleteHi...
ReplyDeleteI have no reason to "LOL"
Mine are serious questions....
Mike's Ingenious Idea
ReplyDeletehttp://www.chimpanzoo.org/african_notecards/chapter_19.html
ReplyDeletePresidential 'debates' aren't debates at all - they're joint press conferences
This kind of format promotes the use of candidates' focus-group tested messaging, "one-liners and canned mini-speeches."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52407.htm
http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1101581137416&ca=f7a541da-5c6c-4dec-b552-bdbde76a1432
Canada, oh Canada! how I love the corporation of Canada.
ReplyDeleteIt's just commerce, no more, no less. Look to the Bills of Exchange Act, the oldest and earliest, as the most recent, 1984 maybe, defines a bank differently, but I doubt it has royal accent.
The Bills of Exchange Act, I suggest, is the Number One Act in all corporations posing as nations.
"however you swim in their sea" Yes we do, and they have brought Admiralty Law onto the but we can too, "walk on water" as the parable states when we interpret the "script" accurately. Remedy is in the Law, Natural Law, not legal statutes.
ReplyDeleteAdmiralty Law onto the Land, but
ReplyDeleteArguing is dishonourable, which is why lawyers and Corporate Courts encourage it. I have lost by walking in. "Settle with your brother / neighbour before you go to Court, if you go to court, be prepared to go to jail" I paraphrase. I have shown I cannot act with honour, and settle out of court.
ReplyDeleteHello Schafers and Alison Chabloz!
Conditional acceptance is honourable. I accept your claim subject to you providing admissible affadavit evidence to unconditionally support your claim.
Look to Graham Hart's recent experience and writings.