September 15, 2013

The Debate - Is U.S. qualified to ask Syria to turn in its chem. weapons?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jQPW_EYUBE
Russia and the United States have come to an agreement on destroying Syria's chemical weapons. Is Washington qualified to demand that Syria or any country turn in their chemical weapons?
This comes as the United States is the only entity that has ever used atomic weapons and has recently used WMD's such as depleted uranium and phosphorus bombs in Iraq and has turned a blind eye to their main ally, Israel, when Tel Aviv uses these same weapons on the Palestinians.

4 comments:

  1. Lawrence Korb's allegiance to Israel is obvious when he employed the obvious denial tactics regarding Israel's use of white phosphorus on Gaza in 2006.

    This clown actually claimed that the only leader to use chemical weapons before the allegations Assad used them was Saddam. I guess Korb has forgotten about the US using agent orange during the Vietnam war.

    But for Korb to actually claim that Israel has no chemical weapons is absurd and an outright lie. Those bastards in Israel have every weapon known on the planet and either bought them or stole them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here is the latest issue of the Anti-NY Times by Mike King of
    Great Tomato Bubble.com

    I do not know know what is really going on. There are more deceptions that you can shake a stick at. It was not that long ago that OBummer and gang set up some special commission for friendliness with Russia.

    I have learned not to trust Russia, Communism and Putin, and I don't care how good Putin may look at the moment in saving us from another unjust war. Everybody is making Putin out to be some kind of saint. I think as we see all these games play out, we will be sorry we cheered and took anyone's side.

    It is all deception and manipulation of the most sophisticated kind.

    "NY Times: U.S. and Russia Reach Deal to Destroy Syria’s Chemical Arms
    By MICHAEL R. GORDON
    The announcement by Secretary of State John Kerry and the Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, set the stage for one of the most challenging undertakings in the history of arms control.




    NY Times: If History Is Any Measure, the Clock Is Ticking
    By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER
    Weapons experts and diplomats say that if President Bashar al-Assad is serious about giving up his arsenal, he will have to take dramatic action in the coming weeks.







    REBUTTAL BY



    The official line, as always defined by "the paper of record", is now very clear - Syria and Russia cannot be trusted and we will be back to the brink of war within in a few months. Note the deliberately pessimistic language of the not one, but two, front page stories in today's Times; "one of the most challenging undertakings in the history of arms control", and "the clock is ticking", and "if President Bashar al-Assad is serious about giving up his arsenal, he will have to take dramatic action in the coming weeks."

    The Putin Peace Plan is obviously being set up for public ridicule and ultimate failure. If President Al Assad were to literally melt down every weapon in Syria's military arsenal, including hand guns, it still wouldn't be good enough for The Times and the Globo-Zionist crime gang. They would then complain about the dangers of Syrian bows and arrows! This negative tone is a sure sign that the U.S. / Israel Axis of Evil will soon be accusing Russia and Syria of cheating. Obongo and his henchmen can then return to the world stage and whine about how hard they tried to "give diplomacy a chance."

    Putin's strong diplomacy (backed by the threat of force), combined with overwhelming public opposition, forced Obongo to back down. But Evil never sleeps. It only changes its tactics. In a sense, the situation is perhaps more dangerous now than it was one week ago. The U.S. now understands that when it returns to the brink of war, it will have to bring a whole lot more firepower to the arena if they want to confront Russia, China, and Iran.

    Meanwhile, on the political front, as the temporarily awakened American people return to their slumber, the Israel Lobby (AIPAC) will continue to bribe and blackmail all those wavering Congressmen. Next time around, they too will have an excuse for supporting Obongo's war.

    This ain't over folks. Not by a longshot. "

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Putin's strong diplomacy (backed by the threat of force), combined with overwhelming public opposition, forced Obongo to back down. But Evil never sleeps. It only changes its tactics. In a sense, the situation is perhaps more dangerous now than it was one week ago."

    Jeannon, one of the best assessments of this living hell ever. May I quote you on this?

    I am serious, that clown's denial of chemical weapons in Gaza, and his assertion the Palestinians started it, truly churned my stomach and ticked me right off.

    Our pistol packing Pastor Dankof displayed admirable restraint but then, when such honesty is facing such evil, just being himself and telling a family story left that Israeli entity lost in his own fog of dishonesty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike King at GreatTomatoBubble.com is who said that and yes, you may quote him with due attribution.

    That particular quote struck me too.

    Changing tactics, changing words and names and labels, changing leaders, names and faces, but the evil beats on.

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.