Guest: Keith Johnson of American Free Press, who (along with Deanna Spingola) has been arguing against the claim that Sandy Hook was a false flag. According to Keith, much of the evidence cited by Sandy Hook skeptics is less convincing than it first appears - and the number of people who would have to be involved in the "total hoax" scenario makes that hypothesis highly implausible.
Compare Keith's points to those made by James Tracy and Jim Fetzer last Friday and in their article, and reach your own conclusions!
Look for Keith Johnson's forthcoming articles on Sandy Hook in American Free Press...
Kevin's blog
TruthJihad.com
24k CF Download
I was impressed by how much Keith Johnson really was prepared for this interview, unlike his AFP debate with Jim Fetzer -- a definite must-listen for those who are still following this issue.
ReplyDeleteHe referred to the Boston Marathon bombings and said he regarded them as real, with real deaths. The last time I checked, all the alleged deaths occurred at the first bombing scene. You know, the one with our hero, Jeff Bauman and the other suspicious characters.
As a result, I don't find any reason to just believe that those deaths actually occurred there.
@FauxCapitalist
ReplyDeleteI'm surprised you didn't link to your own post on what Dr. Stan Monteith, an orthopedic surgeon who has performed many amputations had to say about Jeff Bauman:
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthopedic-surgeon-on-jeff-baumans-leg-amputations-i-believe-that-this-young-man-was-an-actor/
And, btw, thanks for transcribing that.
As far as those other "suspicious characters" you mentioned, here's an excellent video on Carlos Arredendo:
Carlos Arredondo - Boston Hero or NWO FRAUD?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHWkRj5JfMc
Amanda... you are kicking ass and taking names... good on you!!!
ReplyDeleteI am reading your posts on the gold-silver us blog... well done.