November 05, 2014

25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports

The End of the Road for NIST

 Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself – including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.

***Read full article and see Points here*** 

*Much more information here 

1 comment:

  1. Some of these points are very technical, but are are a few of the more straightforward points:

    3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED

    4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST’S COMPUTER MODEL

    7. REFUSING OF FOIA REQUESTS

    8. NEGLIGENCE IN SALVAGING STEEL

    12. NO DISCUSSION OF THE MOLTEN METAL FOUND IN THE RUBBLE OF THE THREE COLLAPSED BUILDINGS.

    25. MOLTEN METAL OBSERVED POURING OUT OF THE CORNER OF WTC 2 REMAINS UNRESOLVED

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.