25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
The End of the Road for NIST
Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly
demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade
Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself –
including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be
investigated.
Some of these points are very technical, but are are a few of the more straightforward points:
ReplyDelete3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED
4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST’S COMPUTER MODEL
7. REFUSING OF FOIA REQUESTS
8. NEGLIGENCE IN SALVAGING STEEL
12. NO DISCUSSION OF THE MOLTEN METAL FOUND IN THE RUBBLE OF THE THREE COLLAPSED BUILDINGS.
25. MOLTEN METAL OBSERVED POURING OUT OF THE CORNER OF WTC 2 REMAINS UNRESOLVED