http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxaZTc_3B5s
What is Washington's strategy against the Islamic State? Is the Islamic
State a creation of the United States? Is the war on terror really a war
on Islam? Will the US make amends with Iran in order to defeat the
Islamic State? What is Wahington's endgame? CrossTalking with Ken
O'Keefe, Majid Rafizadeh, and Peter van Buren.
Ken O'Keefe is one of the most important men on the planet today ~ not that he would accept such an honour.
ReplyDeleteHe slays them in every discussion. Just slays them effortlessly.
Which is probably exactly what you're supposed to think watching a slick RT TV production (which really is just a slightly more "apparently" subversive version of mainstream media if you put a "critical" mind to it)... just sayin...
ReplyDeleteKen represents the virtues of compassion and kindness that is found in all European peoples. He was viscously attacked by Jew thug pigs, he disarmed a few of them and could have killed them but still felt empathy for them and let them live
ReplyDeleteDear Itzda Joos, just what are you trying to really say here? That Ken O'Keefe is off base? Your "just sayin'" rather slurs his integrity. Wondering about your contributions and their value to us all
ReplyDelete... Just wonderin'....
Dear Noor al Haqiqa, please read my comment again. In particular the words "probably", "supposed" and "apparently" and the fact that I never said anything directed at Ken O'Keefe or his comments. All I have done here is "question" the media. Ever since I could think I have questioned. Answers, whilst often contributing to knowledge, bring more questions. I am always going to question.
ReplyDeleteYour questions directed at me above are introducing "supposed" opinions about Ken O'Keefe that in your mind I "may" or "may not" have. They are a product of your mind not mine. I have not questioned Ken O'Keefe at all or mentioned his name until now and I have not "suggested" anything about his integrity. I have certainly not put slurs upon him as you have accused me of which I find a little insulting.
You may well wonder about the "value" of my contributions as I may well wonder about yours "to us all", whoever "all" is but I certainly do not need to, nor will I, validate myself to you. I will continue to question whatever the hell I want, whenever the hell I want and whoever the hell I want and the only respect I will afford you (because I don't you personally & vice versa) is that you also have this right. The only difference I have observed so far between all my comments and all yours is that you tend to occasionally attack the messenger as you have done here whereas I tend to stick to just questioning the message. This is perhaps the biggest problem in our sphere and maybe one you can look at within yourself as something to be dealt with for self-improvement.
Have a nice day :)