January 13, 2015

Proof that the Tsarnaev brothers are innocent of the Boston Bombing - Defense Excluding and Avoiding Conclusive Evidence to Support Official Story


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3aeQT8SYL0
We have all seen the photos and videos that prove the backpack that carried the Boston Bomb does not match those backpacks the Tsarnaev brothers were wearing at the scene just moments before the explosion, but apparently Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's court-appointed defense team is refusing to address this evidence in favor of rushing forward with a plea-deal that will support the official story.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bostom Marathon second bomb, which Dzhokhar Tsaranev is accused of placing WAS BLACK WITH SIDE STRAPS -- Dzhokhar's backpace was WHITE. The Special Task Force (Richard DesLauriers agent in charge) claims they fingered Dzhokhar on the basis of a video showing him drop his backpack near the explosion. But the their photo and DesLauriers own statements establish that the backpack was black. Dzhokhar is innocent.

Note that the video showing him dropping his backpack was never shown -- and all of those who have described it on the media only know about it from briefings they received -- which they do not make clear in some of the media interviews. The lawyer appointed to represent Dzhokhar Tsaranev, Judy Clark, is hiding from the public, is not answering questions -- and has shielded herself from citizens seeking to present the backpack proof of innocence. Judy Clark is convinced of Dzhokhar's guilt and views it as her mission to argue for a life sentence rather than the death penalty. Dzhokhar is kept from the public -- we cannot get this information to him -- he probably has no idea that the bomb backpack was black. Obviously the appointed public defender was appointed because she will not fight to establish Tsaranev's innocence which I have done so simply in this video. -- Dick Eastman

4 comments:

  1. http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/01/a-review-of-boston-smoke-bomb-hoax.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reporter Maria Stephanos should be called as a defense witness (assuming she wasn't part of the disinfo operation), as on that day, she contradicted the official story of where backpack bombs went off, by saying she saw an explosion take place on the side of the building, where the Jumbotron was.

    http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/01/boston-marathon-bombings-explosion-came-from-building-and-injured-people-came-from-behind-glass-walls/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Funny, they switched the settings of my linked video so you have to watch it directly from YouTube and log in to verify your age.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As for that review, it's good overall, but one correction, which is that it states that Jeff Bauman and Nick Vogt had the same leg injury.

    Actually, you can see that the guy presented as Jeff Bauman, being wheeled off in a wheelchair (with curly hair compared to all straight hair pics of the later Jeff Bauman), had a below the knee amputation and came out 19 days later with an above the knee amputation, which is what Nick Vogt had, so they aren't the same person, and that was likely disinfo put out there deliberately, but I don't think any disinfo attempt was made by the person who wrote that review article.

    http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthopedic-surgeon-on-jeff-baumans-leg-amputations-i-believe-that-this-young-man-was-an-actor/

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.