August 05, 2024

CN Tower Disproves Flat Earth Theory - Rick Friedrich ~ Distant Objects Disappear On The Horizon


    
Does the View of Toronto CN Tower Prove Flat Earth?
 
 
 



Your average guy Examines Global and Flat Earth Views considering Toronto Waterfront and CN Tower. Also examining another Canadian's claim that the view of Toronto from Hamilton proves the earth is flat. I take you there so that you can go there yourself and see. Part I (part 2 will add more pictures on a clear day)
 
Does the View of Toronto CN Tower Prove Flat Earth?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i90pFRIBThs

Your average guy Examines Global and Flat Earth Views considering Toronto Waterfront and CN Tower. Also examining another Canadian's claim that the view of Toronto from Hamilton proves the earth is flat. I take you there so that you can go there yourself and see. Part I (part 2 will add more pictures on a clear day) Can you come to a fair conclusion about whether the earth has curvature by visiting Toronto, Hamilton, Burlington and the area with a camera on a clear day? I invite you to visit the locations I have shown and answer these questions for yourself. The size of Toronto's buildings, along with the 30 mile wide lake distance make for a perfect opportunity to consider your theory. I show in this video what happens when a fellow Canadian makes simple mistakes in his calculations. I have gone to the locations myself. See his video here:
 

"This video is for educational purposes, there is no debate or questions here, I am merely showing flatness". - GoodofALL72

He's not showing flatness; he's showing intellectual laziness, ignorance and pretense.
 
 

Observation location: Llanddulas, Conwy, United Kingdom 53.293272, -3.643545
 
"This is a video as I really wanted to do it" - Rick Friedrich



 
"I waited 5 years to find the time and a clear enough day to follow-up on my previous video showing how the CN Tower viewed from Hamilton shoreline disproves Flat Earth Theory. Since I was from Toronto this immediately came to mind when this theory became popular some years back. I had watched a video where a guy claimed the opposite. But he made a major mistake when he showed the base of the CN Tower from Hamilton when he did not consider that where he was standing was on top of the Niagara Escarpment which is 100m or 330' higher than Lake Ontario water. So I returned to the shoreline today to finally settle this for everyone..."
 
For the rest of the story:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhQgeug3Pc4
 
 Voltman

43 comments:

  1. Clearly, this Rick Friedrich character (if that is indeed his real name) is an illuminati operative disinformation agent sent in to hide the truth about flat earth reality. His camera is obviously an illuminati issued camera that distorts reality and shows fake curvature. Voltman has disgraced himself and I suspect he is an agent garnering checks from multiple intelligence agencies.

    In fact, this site is a disinformation operation and a limited hangout to get people thinking there is some kind of absurd Jewish conspiracy to control the world destroy western culture when we really should be focusing on flat earth, the most important issue of all time. There are over 300 Jews in the upper levels of the Biden administration. Who cares!! It's all fake!!!

    We should also be focusing on the flat sun, the flat moon and fake Mars. I subscribe to the cube earth theory. Yes, the earth in actuality is a cube!

    BTW the windmill video gives the details of the camera, the tripod and weather conditions. Note the back peddling and suddenly, he's "not going to play" when confronted with credible evidence that contradicts his lunatic theories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like a cock-with-a-walk know-it-all juvenile, always utilizing ridicule, mockery, and condescension. No argumentation, line-of-reasoning, or detailed breakdown of a specific angle. Nope! Just puerile buffoonery to convince yourself that you are somehow "above it all!" Clown!

      Delete
  2. Again, operating on multiple presuppositions without even being aware of it. As the Nietzsche quote I referenced yesterday said, "People don't want their illusions destroyed," so they funnel everything into their confirmation bias or, they simply ignore any content or information that threatens their existing dogmatic model. Knowledge is not some neutral variable, it has significant psych-emotional consequences! A not wanting to see can be a greater and more overpowering drive than a wanting to see!

    If the Earth possessed curvature, we would regularly see skyscrapers and other tall objects, like mountains, "leaning backwards" away from us, at a well-defined angles, the farther out they were perceived when viewed from distances approximating 10+ miles or more. Or, if they were far enough away, they shouldn't be able to be seen at all!

    https://youtu.be/rdnbHVtdWEk?si=nQ_UuwXph0D2ihhH

    Commercial and/or military pilots would have to continually adjust their flight-paths to compensate for the said curvature. I've read through both the AOM(Aircraft Operating Manual) and the AFM(Aircraft Flight Manual); nowhere within these is the adjustment to the Earth's curvature discussed or, when and how commercial pilots are to adjust and/or compensate for said curvature, neither during manual flight, nor during autopilot. Both manuals operate on the assumption of a flat and level landscape and horizon. At speeds of 500-600mph, any adjustment would have to be almost constant!

    In addition, planes could never land on runways running along a North-South axis because, the Earth's hundreds-of-mph spin would IMMEDIATELY tear-off and destroy the landing gear, causing a catastrophic wreck. It would be like jumping on a speeding treadmill sideways hoping to land on your feet.

    This doesn't even address planes landing on runways with an East-West line where, they would be landing with THE SPIN COMING DIRECTLY TOWARDS THEM and, with THE SPIN MOVING DIRECTLY AWAY FROM THEM. Each instance would present its own potentially catastrophic outcomes!

    Also, planes flying "towards, and AGAINST the spin" of the Earth would arrive to their destination in mere minutes at times whereas, those planes "flying WITH the spin" would never reach their destination in certain cases because, the spin of the Earth would be faster than the commercial jet is traveling, especially near the equator where, we are told, the Earth spins at approximately 1000mph. The Earth would basically "outrun" the jet!

    Longitude Deceptions Inserted Into History

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/5fT52JAeEQ6T/

    Making Accurate World-Distance Calculations Using Gleeson's Flat Earth Map

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/yeguRnTp0Tlu/

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Book of Mormon and the Torah claim flat erf
    "23 Know ye not that ye are in the hands of God? Know ye not that he hath all power, and at his great command the earth shall be rolled together as a scroll?"
    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/morm/5?lang=eng

    "This chapter describes the talmudic model of the universe. The rabbis of the Talmud believed that the world was flat, and that the sun revolved around the Earth every day."
    https://academic.oup.com/book/1751/chapter-abstract/141387578?redirectedFrom=fulltext

    ReplyDelete
  4. On April 1 2021, Chainsawmiller wrote:

    "There are rational arguments (for Flat Earth) you realize that, right? "

    Voltman answered:

    No I don't; I don't go looking for them either. I have no need of their arguments. My time is better spent dealing with real science (electrical engineering in particular). I'm quite comfortable zooming around the Sun at high speed and spinning on my axis every 24 hours.

    In addition, I gave you lots to chew on but, it was almost all a waste of my time: neither you nor Albert even touched upon 5% of what I brought up.

    For example:

    I have 2 books that list the positions of the planets, Moon and Sun for every day of the year from January 1st 1900 to December 31st 2050. Such a book is called an Ephemeris and is well known to astrologers. The Heliocentric planetary model WORKS because it corresponds with the observations of astronomers.

    I'm quite satisfied with the heliocentric "gravitational" model upgraded with the new understanding afforded by the emerging "Electric Universe" paradigm as described by David Talbot & Wal Thornhill who expanded on Velikovsky's observations.
    -----------------------------------

    The atmosphere moves along with the earth so there is no constant high speed wind relative to the surface of the earth. The earth is a gravity sink; it pulls everything that has a mass towards its center.

    The fundamental energetic shape of matter at all scales is the toroid. A spinning toroid defines an axis and a plane. The plane is at the equator; in the case of Saturn, that plane has rings of solid matter floating around. All the other planets have invisible energetic rings that can be "seen" when they transit the Sun.

    Flat Earth implies no curvature.

    Curvature is detectable and measurable.

    Therefore Flat Earth theory is invalid, false, not true.

    No flat earth model accounts for what is observed by thousands of people equipped with a telescope and a scientific mind.
    ---------------------------

    An airplane does not need to constantly make corrections to maintain constant altitude. The gravitational pull is constant at constant altitude.

    The owners of the plantation do not want us to know what is at the poles because there is something very special about poles (and the equator) in an Electric Universe.


    April 2, 2021 at 12:00 AM https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-grabblers-are-coming-adam-green.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1- "I don't go looking for them either. I have no need of their arguments"

      Quintessential confirmation bias! I'm only going to look at and absorb information that Im comfortable with and, that already fits my predetermined dogmatic outlook. Someone with an open mind hardly takes this stubborn and haughty position!

      2- "My time is better spent dealing with real science"

      Please provide a reasonable definition and some reliable working criteria of what would exactly constitute a "real science?" I would ask that you attempt to do so without having recourse to derisive mockery and/or ridicule!

      3- "The atmosphere moves along with the Earth"

      Explain(using "real science" of course)exactly how the Earth's atmosphere can even co-exist adjacent to the so-called "vacuum of space?"

      3- "An airplane doesn't need to constantly make corrections to maintain constant attitude"

      So "gravity" functions as some kind of quasi-autopilot? For the sake of convenience and brevity, I won't go into the fiction known as "gravity," its historical origins and, all of its
      problematic aspects- I will accept how it is being utilized here.

      Explain exactly how "gravity" even neutralizes and overcomes the hundreds-of-thousands of pounds of engine-thrust- as each engine of a Boeing 777 basically puts out- and, adjusts for and compensates the settings of the altimeter, ailerons and, the actuator controls of the horizontal stabilizer to "maintain constant altitude?"

      Delete
  5. "An airplane does not need to constantly make corrections to maintain constant altitude. The gravitational pull is constant at constant altitude."
    That's something not everyone understands, even pilots. An airplane in "straight and level" flight is actually in very low earth orbit. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wrote:
    "An airplane does not need to constantly make corrections to maintain constant altitude. The gravitational pull is constant at constant altitude."
    Chains wrote:
    Ah nice try, the reason is is because the earth is flat brother! LOL

    Rick Friedrich and the other guy show that there is a curvature to the earth and what's your conclusion?

    "the earth is flat brother!"

    I don't believe you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Doesn't shortwave radio prove round earth?

    ReplyDelete
  8. chainsawmiller has made 93 post since Scorpio's show.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Seriously though, when are you going back to work?

    ReplyDelete
  10. doh huh huh da erf is flat watta buncha retards
    https://panoradio-sdr.de/the-world-of-shortwave-signals/

    ReplyDelete
  11. US Navy Missle Instructor Confirms Flat Earth

    https://youtu.be/xJOB0vcZ4NI?si=SvLwSGrfXzYD_z-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cartoons and some sailor by a gamer who believes in Bigfoot. WOW

      Delete
  12. Oh God...I accidentally turned Mami's into a flat earth retard discussion forum with one line from my last show:

    If you are on the road to thinking everything is fake, your final destination is flat earth...

    Looks like this is true and it appears I have hit a nerve as well. I'm sure Volt already knows I was joking around with my previous comment and to the contrary, it was a great post with quite a bit of evidence that should put this ludicrous concept to rest, although I'm sure it won't. Trying to argue with flat earthers is like arguing with religious fanatics. After all, its origins are in the Buybull.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a shocker! More monotonous and repetitive disparagement and mockery. No detailed, point-by-point argumentation- nope! Just the predictable backhanded belittling and sour scorn. If we could only be as elevated and above it all like the mighty David Scorpio!🙄

      Delete
  13. Nice to see you two back together today , Scorpio, on the launch of FTJ
    Looking forward to its success....

    Looks like this might be the final nail in the coffin over at RBN???
    Who knows, they might have enough "trumptards" to keep the station a float. I highly doubt it though.
    The content on the network has completely gone to shit since John Stadtmiller died.

    And really, when he and Alan Watt couldn't come to an agreement.


    Link here
    https://odysee.com/@GManGiuseppe:e/FTJLaunch:7

    Clinton
    from Ontario

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure RBN is worried about a boycott by the 10 active members information underground/mami's shit

      Delete
  14. As for this flat earth retardedness, Thanks to Cass Sunstein and his Idf INTERNET ARMY OF TROLLS. circa 2008.

    It doesn't matter to me if its round, flat , rectangular , square or a diamond shape...
    It doesn't effect anyone's day to day life.
    It doesn't change the fact your a salve to a idiotic system.
    It doesn't change you bank account , food costs or gas payment for your car/truck.

    The only argument I have ever heard, from any flat earther , in regards to why flat earth matters ,NOW , in today's current situation ( for us white folks) is the fact that the elite/government/powers that be are lying to us...


    WELL FUCKING DUH!

    We don't need a flat earth theory to tell anyone with half a brain that fact...


    Even if the earth is flat.... WHAT FUCKING GOOD IS THAT DOING FOR Y'ALL?

    I am sorry for getting involved in this retarded theory, as open minded I am to wonder or disbelief .

    But I witnessed the timing of it back in 2008 and after, and I seen the division it caused amongst the truth community online and in real life. 2008 was peak 911 truth being exposed... among many other conspiratorial tales...


    Clinton
    from Ontario

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey flat erf tard, in almost 100 post you haven't addressed a single piece of evidence against flat erf. Rambling esoteric nonsense and watch these yootoobs doesn't count. Here's another one on your overflowing plate; how does GPS work over the ocean where there's no fake GPS transmission antennas on the ground?

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1st time I've ever had comments removed.


    strange.



    Clinton
    from Ontario

    ReplyDelete
  17. No problem!
    LIKE THE GREAT COVID 19 (COMMIE ) SLOGAN TOLD US ALL...

    WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER.
    (KEEP 6 FEET APART)


    Clinton
    from Ontario

    ReplyDelete
  18. Please go back to work asap Chris. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3drHraOdyQM
    Distant Objects Disappear On The Horizon - Experiment Part III - Nikon P900 [Windmills]
    Sorry, this video didn't prove to me the earth has curvature.
    Windmills only appear smaller because of distance. And proportion of perception of reduction in size is uniform. Where if earth was round, size of windmills, difference between size of disappearing windmills would be multiplied.

    Curvature would be noticeable looking at the tops of them aligned windmills.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The windmill blades appear closer to the water the further away because of round earth you idiot.
      https://youtu.be/3drHraOdyQM?t=289

      Delete
  20. The boys are on live now.

    https://odysee.com/@GManGiuseppe:e/SaneAsylum257:6

    Clinton
    from Ontario

    ReplyDelete
  21. I know one thing, no nigger has ever told me earth is flat.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Where is the curve?
    A collection curvature images.

    There are three "kinds" of curvature we can readily observe to know the Earth is a very large spheroid.
    https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2017/06/where-is-curve.html

    ReplyDelete
  23. I've seen more trannies change their mind than flat earth idiots. Call it ego investment, it's easier to ignore facts and stick to mistaken beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No responding to questions directly or providing even a partially detailed argument. Anybody can (and often do) "copy and paste" a link that looks impressive with nice pictures and mathematical diagrams that already fits into their preexisting confirmation bias. What do YOU have to say?

    I caution you with just rashly posting something because it looks cool and possesses nice pictures, some formulaic math, and cool supplementary graphs. The goofball below thought he was spreading his impressive spinning-ball peacock feathers while flexing hard on "doze fwat erfers" when, he only made himself look like a fool, and was called out for it in the comment section.

    This meathead falsely interpreted the said "mathematical curvature formula" to be 8-inches PER MILE when,...it is (8/mi 2)and, is accurate to 1/2% at about 1,000 miles. That's PER MILE SQUARED!

    1st mile is...8-inches!

    Remember to times the miles by itself then 8-inches squared!

    1×1=1×8=8

    2nd mile!

    2×2=4×8=32-inches!

    3rd mile!

    3×3=9×8=72-inches!

    9th mile!

    9×9=81×8=648-inches(54ft)


    So, the so-called "curvature drop" at approximately 60-miles would be about 2400ft. World Trade Center One is 1,776ft. tall and the Willis Tower(formerly known as the Sears Tower) is 1,451ft. They wouldn't be visible from approximately 60-miles!

    https://youtu.be/ZVAH1XeELpQ?si=-F7DUz3ZLtwWWZRQ

    ReplyDelete
  25. Again, the photo addressed in the video is approximately 56-miles from the Willis Tower. Only an uneducated buffoon- like the weatherman referenced in the video- would call the skyline a mirage!

    Rob Skiba Proves The Chicago Skyline(as seen from across Lake Michigan)Is Not A Mirage

    https://youtu.be/o37t6iBS_q4?si=FRjpdHk6nOyU8EUF

    ReplyDelete
  26. https://archive.org/details/ZeteticPhilosophyParallax
    Zetetic Philosophy ( Parallax) Rowbotham robotham flat earth zetetics
    Read a few lines about him. Truth is there and also a lot of probably invented baggage. Lies about him.

    https://crouchrarebooks.com/product/print/the-origins-of-flat-earth-theory/

    There is a canal in England, long and straight. Proved it.
    Them windmills and the person who filmed it, rank amateur, pure slop and still didn't prove curvature.
    Probably good enough for Pantsdown.
    T.Rex what a joke.
    It's a cartoon, Panzerfaust.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Everything that doesn't fit flat erf is fake"
      Right here at the evil NASA you can pick fake satellite images they make around the clock lol
      https://weather.ndc.nasa.gov/GOES/

      Delete
  27. Well said Ed
    I gotta read what Robotham wrote.
    A clean PDF would be great.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Battleship gunnery in the early 1940's required compensation for round earth. Navies would not have gone through the trouble if earth was flat.
    https://youtu.be/wKTvZ8azi5U?t=112

    Also, they needed a crow's nest, sometimes two, for a spotter to see where the fucking rounds were going.
    https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/0d/bc/e2/bc/photo8jpg.jpg?w=600&h=500&s=1

    ReplyDelete
  29. See the two tall ass towers on this battleship.
    https://www.naval-history.net/PhotoWW1-01bbUSWyoming2PS.jpg

    They were put there because:
    "Everybody knows that the higher we go, the further we can see. If the Earth was flat, this would not be the case, as you would be able to see all the way to the end of the planet from any place without relief, even the sea. With a powerful telescope you would see from New York to Madrid. But that is not possible, due to the curvature of the surface of the Earth. This has been known since ancient times, and that is why lighthouses are placed on top of a tower so that they are visible from a greater distance. And vice versa: if you are in a port and you watch a ship arrive, first you will see the mast – the highest part of the ship – appear, then the sails, and finally the hull.Everybody knows that the higher we go, the further we can see. If the Earth was flat, this would not be the case, as you would be able to see all the way to the end of the planet from any place without relief, even the sea. With a powerful telescope you would see from New York to Madrid. But that is not possible, due to the curvature of the surface of the Earth. This has been known since ancient times, and that is why lighthouses are placed on top of a tower so that they are visible from a greater distance. And vice versa: if you are in a port and you watch a ship arrive, first you will see the mast – the highest part of the ship – appear, then the sails, and finally the hull."

    https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2022-08-13/how-do-you-convince-a-flat-earther-that-our-planet-is-really-round.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A big powerful 30ft light on the coast just a few feet above sea level and a powerful telescope 15 miles away at sea level on the other side of the gulf. I reckon you'd be able to see it. At 9 miles you'd be able to see it. This experiment should be crowd-funded.

      Would be too difficult to prove. Very easy if the night was clear.

      Delete
  30. Go to Tardfund.com to get $$ for all your flat earf experiments

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'll pitch in for the Chains flat earth rocket experiment.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Chainster,

    It's almost a waste of time with some of these guys. I guarantee that they simply ignore, skip over, or, if they do go over some of these links, they do it with indignation and resentment. As Bezmenov emphasized in his interviews, when people are programmed, access to true information or facts just doesn't matter anymore; the firewall of denial and resistance is so entrenched!

    Anyhow, that's not really why I'm replying. My father was in the Air Force for 22yrs. When I was a young tot(I'm 55 now), we lived in Africa for 5yrs, we traveled all over Europe and, eventually he became stationed in So. California at George AFB(closed in '94?)just outside of San Bernadino where we lived for some years before he retired and we moved to Utah.

    He use to take me out on the tarmac regularly, to Edwards AFB periodically, the airshows, and buy me model planes to build which, hung all over my ceiling as a boy. Airplanes were a big part of my life growing up.

    The supersonic test piloting program was absolutely amazing! Those guys were some testosterone-filled hombres! The limits that they pushed and risks they took were next-level! The documentary below has some of the old footage.

    The whole X-series leading-up to Dornberger's X-15 was simply fascinating. It exemplified the Promethean visionary genius of the so-called "Nordic spirit" and, in a certain sense, was a continuation of the National Socialist Wunderwaffe. I have an interesting book by Dornberger called 'V2' which details the early history of the V-1 and V2 and rocket propulsion itself overall. Guys like Dornberger and von Braun make Elon Musk look like an comical amateur with his CGI and fake SpaceX crap!


    https://youtu.be/5RB1j8zx8jY?si=Fq__ppR-KAfWM_qc

    ReplyDelete
  33. No X-15 pilot believed in flat erf because they saw the curvature.
    https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2023/12/12/x-15a-flight-no-3-7-14-to-the-edge-of-space/

    Neither did Wernher von Braun.

    ReplyDelete


The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.