It is thus necessary to understand that there is no difference between
the “moderate rebels,” ISIS, and Nusra in order to understand the
deceptive nature of the narrative being promoted by mainstream media
outlets regarding the recent “alliance.”
As it is, the story provided by Western media outlets will be used to
justify NATO military invasion in Syria based on the lie that the poor
“moderate rebels” and “peaceful democracy-loving ‘activists’” are being
overwhelmed by both ISIS/Nusra extremists on one side and brutal
dictator Assad on the other. If America does not step in on the side of
the moderates, the story goes, the poor “moderates” will be eradicated
and America left with the choice between Islamic extremists or a
civilian-killing dictator.
Of course, the very notion that America deserves any options in the
internal affairs of a foreign nation is an expression of gross
arrogance. It is also absurd to paint Bashar al-Assad as a brutal
dictator who kills his own people when there has been no shred of
evidence to indicate that Assad has intentionally targeted civilians
during the entire conflict.
The United States and NATO have funded, armed, trained, and directed the
terrorists rampaging across Syria from the very beginning of the crisis
and continue to do so today. We must not allow ourselves to be fooled
by propaganda and false narratives designed to stampede us to war.
***Read full article here***
*Obama admits that his public ISIS strategy is wrong, Bashar al-Assad must be deposed
*ISIS is America’s Dream Rebel Army
*ISIS: the Useful Enemy
*U.S. Destroying Syria’s Oil Infrastructure Under Guise of Fighting ISIS
*Meanwhile, Whatever Happened to Al Qaeda??
*'Terrorism a tool at the hands of imperialism'
*There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime of 9/11
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Recaptcha is disabled because most of you are not robots.