How did this tape surface? Did sympathetic police leak it? If that's the explanation for one anomaly, it might also explain the scarf, that the police would always as a matter of course and habit remove from any arrested person immediately.
Is this one of yours, slackjaw? No sourcing then, truth too much effort? So maybe the vid just has loads of disinfo, and that's how and why it was put out, and why the 'cops' behaved extraordinarily? Who the fuck can know?
Christ almighty, who posted this first and where did they get it from? Does no-one know or care here? Is it just post any old shit and we'll see what gets the most comments, the funniest response, the best insult, the wackiest conspiracy theory, or what ....?
You only play games. Or else answer essential relevant questions:
How did this tape surface? Did sympathetic police leak it? Why didn't police remove the scarf of a suspect? Does the testimony had loads of disinfo? Do you not recognise these questions are valid and deserving of an answer? Isn't sourcing your material important to you? (Coz it is to your audience.) How can we know what to think about your product if you won't explain your reasoning and motives even? Why didn't you already answer my sensible questions?
But aside from that, goodwill and all, I'm sure you're super good and on our side, you legitimately wonderful person.
4 comments:
How did this tape surface? Did sympathetic police leak it? If that's the explanation for one anomaly, it might also explain the scarf, that the police would always as a matter of course and habit remove from any arrested person immediately.
Is this one of yours, slackjaw? No sourcing then, truth too much effort? So maybe the vid just has loads of disinfo, and that's how and why it was put out, and why the 'cops' behaved extraordinarily? Who the fuck can know?
Christ almighty, who posted this first and where did they get it from? Does no-one know or care here? Is it just post any old shit and we'll see what gets the most comments, the funniest response, the best insult, the wackiest conspiracy theory, or what ....?
I'm asking serious and legitimate questions, and getting answers like this, designed to discourage serious and legitimate questions.
You only play games. Or else answer essential relevant questions:
How did this tape surface?
Did sympathetic police leak it?
Why didn't police remove the scarf of a suspect?
Does the testimony had loads of disinfo?
Do you not recognise these questions are valid and deserving of an answer?
Isn't sourcing your material important to you? (Coz it is to your audience.)
How can we know what to think about your product if you won't explain your reasoning and motives even?
Why didn't you already answer my sensible questions?
But aside from that, goodwill and all, I'm sure you're super good and on our side, you legitimately wonderful person.
Post a Comment