Which raises another burning question: Why would AIPAC want to
protect the Saudis? The many “leaks” bandied about (or should we say
Bandared about) in the mainstream media all point to the Saudis as the
culprits who attacked America on 9/11, according to the Joint
Congressional Report’s redacted pages. Yet Israel is lobbying Congress
to cover it up.
Are the leaks blaming the Saudis a misdirection ploy? Could it be
that the “one or more” foreign intelligence agencies involved in the
planning and execution of 9/11 included the Israeli Mossad?
Look at where the “blame the Saudis” leaks are coming from. Paul
Sperry, author of the New York Post article on the Lynch and Jones
request, works for the Hoover Institute, an Israel-affiliated neocon
think tank. The Post itself is one of New York’s several Israeli
propaganda outfits that pose as newspapers. Sperry claims that “unnamed
CIA sources” told him the redacted pages of the Joint Report implicate
the Saudis. Do those “CIA sources” really think the Saudis have the
covert-ops capacity, political clout, and motive to attack the US and
get away with it? Or is Sperry, and his real or imaginary sources, doing
what the Hoover Institute and the New York Post always do: Fronting for
Israel?
***Read article at Veterans Today***
*More info.
