And while the US seeks to sell its "buffer zone" strategy under a
variety of pretexts - from protecting refugees to fighting the so-called
"Islamic State" (ISIS/ISIL) - it is admittedly a tactic aimed instead
at America's true objectives in Syria - the destruction of its
government, the division of its people, and the eradication of its
sovereignty.
In 2012, it was clear that the region north of Aleppo and across the
border into Turkey, had become one of two primary points (Jordan being
the other) of staging and entry for NATO-backed terrorists operating in
Syria. It was from across the border north of Aleppo and Idlib that
NATO-armed, funded, and trained terrorists from Libya first flowed into
Syrian territory and from where
the initial 2012 invasion of Aleppo emanated.
While NATO opened up several other fronts along Syria's northern border,
this has remained their primary focus - specifically for the purpose of
taking Idlib, Aleppo, or both, establishing them as a seat of
government for a proxy regime, and as a strategic and logistical
springboard to wage war deeper into Syrian territory from.
While initially the West attempted to make ISIS appear to be sustaining
its fighting capacity within a vacuum deep within Syrian and Iraqi
territory, allegedly sustaining itself on ransoms and black market oil,
the scale of their operations has since betrayed this narrative,
revealing immense state-sponsorship behind them.
***Read full article here***