Jonathon Azaziah's Mask of Zion Report Aug 2, 2012
News round-up followed by Jonathon’s
devastating analysis/refutation of the lies spewed by ‘Sasson’ & co
who appeared on Keith Johnson’s previous program.
Yes, every American-Iranian who hates what Khomeini's Mullahs have turned their country into better all agree with Mr. Islamabad Brooklyn's 'devastations' and Khomeini worship lest that lunatic Mark Glenn put one of his 600 guns up their asses & shoot them for treason of having 'loose lips.'
Khomeini was the greatest freedom-fighter that ever was and his followers the number one avatar of freedom the world over. All hail!
The enemy of your enemy is your friend & you shall always look the other way when the enemy of your enemy acts like your enemy until your enemy is dead. Just like you look the other way when a rapist helps you catch a gang of serial killers, plain and simple tactical necessity. Calling the guy a rapist to his face while you're busy getting the serial killers is counterproductive, don't you think?
Never mind the despicable books that Khomeini actually wrote & the 'eminently fair and just' actual written laws of Islamic Iran, available online, which anyone can read in 3 seconds but which, of course, no one needs to read, lest they utter a treasonous word from their treacherous tongues to set Mark Glenn & Mr. Brooklyn off into a raging rampage of denunciation and party purgings.
Why isn't Iran fighting on the side of Assad ?
Why did they not fight on the side of Libya ?
Why did even their rhetoric support the western manufactured 'rebels' against Quaddafi?
They care about their people don't you see ?
Obviously not, since they fought for 6 years too long against Iraq 20 years ago and lost over 500,000 people just to satisfy Ayatollah bloodlust after Iraq had offered armistice. But don't dare mention that simple historical fact to Mr. Brooklyn or Glenn or you'll get an hour of yelling and screaming down your throat.
Are these Mullahs puppeteering Ahmedinejad as a front-man naive enough to think that if they won't even support anti-JWO Muslim countries like Syria and Libya (countries that actually benefited their own people, unlike post-Khomeini Iran) with soldiers on the ground fighting a just war against western invaders, if they won't even do that, will any other Muslim countries, never mind Russia and China, ever back them up when they get attacked ?
I don't think so.
They're not naive. They've never been naive. They have no illusions about Russian and Chinese support.
They're just performing their function, just like the Soviets with their anti-imperialist 'righteous' rhetoric before them managed for 47 postwar years and how many anti-communist wars ? A ton. All of them controlled opposition and all of them considered genuine freedom movements by the communists that actually fought them on the ground, from Korea to Vietnam to Cuba to Nicaragua and beyond.
1 comment:
Yes, every American-Iranian who hates what Khomeini's Mullahs have turned their country into better all agree with Mr. Islamabad Brooklyn's 'devastations' and Khomeini worship lest that lunatic Mark Glenn put one of his 600 guns up their asses & shoot them for treason of having 'loose lips.'
Khomeini was the greatest freedom-fighter that ever was and his followers the number one avatar of freedom the world over. All hail!
The enemy of your enemy is your friend & you shall always look the other way when the enemy of your enemy acts like your enemy until your enemy is dead. Just like you look the other way when a rapist helps you catch a gang of serial killers, plain and simple tactical necessity. Calling the guy a rapist to his face while you're busy getting the serial killers is counterproductive, don't you think?
Never mind the despicable books that Khomeini actually wrote & the 'eminently fair and just' actual written laws of Islamic Iran, available online, which anyone can read in 3 seconds but which, of course, no one needs to read, lest they utter a treasonous word from their treacherous tongues to set Mark Glenn & Mr. Brooklyn off into a raging rampage of denunciation and party purgings.
Why isn't Iran fighting on the side of Assad ?
Why did they not fight on the side of Libya ?
Why did even their rhetoric support the western manufactured 'rebels' against Quaddafi?
They care about their people don't you see ?
Obviously not, since they fought for 6 years too long against Iraq 20 years ago and lost over 500,000 people just to satisfy Ayatollah bloodlust after Iraq had offered armistice. But don't dare mention that simple historical fact to Mr. Brooklyn or Glenn or you'll get an hour of yelling and screaming down your throat.
Are these Mullahs puppeteering Ahmedinejad as a front-man naive enough to think that if they won't even support anti-JWO Muslim countries like Syria and Libya (countries that actually benefited their own people, unlike post-Khomeini Iran) with soldiers on the ground fighting a just war against western invaders, if they won't even do that, will any other Muslim countries, never mind Russia and China, ever back them up when they get attacked ?
I don't think so.
They're not naive. They've never been naive. They have no illusions about Russian and Chinese support.
They're just performing their function, just like the Soviets with their anti-imperialist 'righteous' rhetoric before them managed for 47 postwar years and how many anti-communist wars ? A ton. All of them controlled opposition and all of them considered genuine freedom movements by the communists that actually fought them on the ground, from Korea to Vietnam to Cuba to Nicaragua and beyond.
Post a Comment