Guest:
RamZpaul joins me again to continue our conversation about race, racism, nationalism, cultural marxists, refugees, multiculturalism and why the promotion of multiculturalism is only focused on majority European heritage nations: USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, and Europe. No one is pushing for Japan, China, Mexico or any other nations to change their nations into a nation that is no longer majority occupied by the people who founded the nation. So why is it acceptable for that to happen to nations of European Heritage? It isn’t.
Maggie's SiteMaggies Chat Orion Talk Radio
Download
3 comments:
People like Metzger or RamzPaul sound a bit weird at first but what they say makes sense.
Promoting the interests of while people has been equated with racism. I think it's all based on continual guilt tripping of the current generation for historical mistreatment of native peoples. Or I guess in Britain's case for mistreatment of foreign peoples.
It's fair to help out the Australian aboriginals if possible but it's okay to be uneasy about a policy of settling thousands of refugees per year (mainly from Africa as it happens) in suburbs of 95% european people. 20,000 a year doesn't sound like much but keep that up for a decade and you have a significant enough population in a country with a small population.
But I don't blame the refugees for taking advantage of an open door policy to a mostly white country that has appeared.
Metzger? Do you mean Israel's Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger?
http://grizzom.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/truth-militia-radio-20120916.html
Post a Comment