The Russian pogroms WERE instigated by Rothschild, Schiff, et al -- to get them to flee to the USA by the 100s of thousands at the turn of the century, so they could form their democractic votig bloc (the only party they controlled just then) -- in order to get in their boy Woody Wilson, who wold approve of their Federal Reserve act, etc., etc.
An interesting and informative show by a good guy, but his beliefs about the so-called "Northern War of Aggression" are murky, if not crashingly wrong.
The leaders of the Southern States made it perfectly clear why they were seceding. In pronouncement after pronouncement, in declaration after declaration, they let it be known that their reasons had just about everything to do with the issue of slavery. These Southern leaders, almost all of whom were Christian, would often cite The Old Testament to justify their stance, just like their fellow church pastors in the South (perhaps it should not come as any suprise that the likes of Judah Benjamin played an important role in The Confederacy).
It is critical to keep in mind that, with the exception of extremely vocal, radical, obnoxious and hopelessly naive abolishionists and egalitarians, there was hardly anyone in The North, including Lincoln, who was threatening to put an end to slavery where it already existed. The real source of contention was over the expansion of slavery, and the Southern elites made it very clear that they would not tolerate limits on that expansion. Working white people be damned!
Say all the nasty things that you want about Lincoln. Most of them are true-- though a very strong and active Jewish role at that time is questionable. Also, more often than not, the behavior of the Northern forces during and after the war was, to put in mildly, unacceptable, despicable and deplorable.
However, perhaps "White Nationalists" should be somewhat grateful that the Southern elites did not get their way and be allowed to trample all over "States' Rights," pushing the practice of slavery into the new territories. The Northwest and Midwest would not be so relatively homogeneous today.
Dont worry Anon. You bring up a good point that most jew-christ worshipers don't like to think about. Whooli always reacts that way towards information that he can't comprehend. I live in the northeast, and we sure as hell have a lot of blacks, but certainly not as much as if the jewish slave owners expanded their territory. Many northerners that weren't self hating liberals wanted them sent back to Africa. Lincoln even said that whites and blacks could and should never live in the same society. And I share the same opinion now. John wilkes booth was a kike.
Beep, So far Condit won't have anything to do with it. Martin and Spingola discuss the issue briefly in this interview. http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/03/spingola-speaks-20130314.html
Whether hitler was a jew or not, 'israel' was the result of his agreements with the jews. You can prop him up as a demi-god if youd like, but thats just historically ignorant and intellectually foolish. The jews even have hitler fetishes in their disgusting porn industry in 'israel'. They love him for keeping them away from the bombing in cozy camps with movie theaters and swimming pools. If it wasn't for his route of action in dealing with them then they wouldn't have their precious homeland.
Benedict Klassen (Nature's Eternal Religion - and a slew of other books) knocked Hitler for pursuing nationalism and not racialism. Nationalism is just as easy to manipulate so it becomes chauvinism and overrides race consciousness. Witness WW1 and WW2 and plenty more back for 300 years.
This is another instance of conquest by population reduction, here achieved through selecting out the most vigorous part of the gene pool. Another example is initiatives for women to join fighting ranks and so forth. (Reflect on the fact that a single man may serve a harem and produce many offspring but a woman can't biologically do the equivalent).
One criticism I have of Deanna Spingola, Veronica Clarke/e etc etc in relation to their attempted rehabilition of Hitler's Germany is that they seem to ignore the fact of popular emotionality which assisted in the process of hijacking /misdirecting what initially were demands for territorial integrity based on ethnicity and undoing the injustice of Versailles 1919.
"Deutschland, Deutschland uber alles!" instead of peaceful co-existence, cannot be ignored. Pan-Germanism was a FACT and denying that is like denying that European nations were competing among themselves for overseas influence, grabs of resources and so on.
As usual there is evidence this channelled competitiveness was exploited by those having interests beyond national self-identity. Nesta Webster's Secret Societies and Subversive Movements has a short section covering Pan-"Germanism", as well as her other works.
17 comments:
The Russian pogroms were all Rothschild / Schiff instigated.
The Russian pogroms WERE instigated by Rothschild, Schiff, et al -- to get them to flee to the USA by the 100s of thousands at the turn of the century, so they could form their democractic votig bloc (the only party they controlled just then) -- in order to get in their boy Woody Wilson, who wold approve of their Federal Reserve act, etc., etc.
It's all a bunch of Jacob Schiff. lol
support for National Protectionism & repel the divider
http://pastebin.ru/ytVsWgJj
An interesting and informative show by a good guy, but his beliefs about the so-called "Northern War of Aggression" are murky, if not crashingly wrong.
The leaders of the Southern States made it perfectly clear why they were seceding. In pronouncement after pronouncement, in declaration after declaration, they let it be known that their reasons had just about everything to do with the issue of slavery. These Southern leaders, almost all of whom were Christian, would often cite The Old Testament to justify their stance, just like their fellow church pastors in the South (perhaps it should not come as any suprise that the likes of Judah Benjamin played an important role in The Confederacy).
It is critical to keep in mind that, with the exception of extremely vocal, radical, obnoxious and hopelessly naive abolishionists and egalitarians, there was hardly anyone in The North, including Lincoln, who was threatening to put an end to slavery where it already existed. The real source of contention was over the expansion of slavery, and the Southern elites made it very clear that they would not tolerate limits on that expansion. Working white people be damned!
Say all the nasty things that you want about Lincoln. Most of them are true-- though a very strong and active Jewish role at that time is questionable. Also, more often than not, the behavior of the Northern forces during and after the war was, to put in mildly, unacceptable, despicable and deplorable.
However, perhaps "White Nationalists" should be somewhat grateful that the Southern elites did not get their way and be allowed to trample all over "States' Rights," pushing the practice of slavery into the new territories. The Northwest and Midwest would not be so relatively homogeneous today.
Anon 1:21, Bullshit!
Great show Mike 5/5. http://youtu.be/BoWv2IqreGY
WHOOLI,
Explain your reaction, kind sir.
The idea that the Southern elites were trying to "trample" all over states rights is laughable.
Dont worry Anon. You bring up a good point that most jew-christ worshipers don't like to think about. Whooli always reacts that way towards information that he can't comprehend. I live in the northeast, and we sure as hell have a lot of blacks, but certainly not as much as if the jewish slave owners expanded their territory. Many northerners that weren't self hating liberals wanted them sent back to Africa. Lincoln even said that whites and blacks could and should never live in the same society. And I share the same opinion now. John wilkes booth was a kike.
"he can't comprehend" Another Anon clown.
WHOOLI, don't you even know that Hitler was an illegitimate son of Rotschild himself?
You "white nationalists" seems to totally lack any knowledge of true history.
Did Condit ever come back for part 2 after Rodney Martin trashed his "Hitler was a Jew" nonsense on Spingola a few weeks ago?
Beep, So far Condit won't have anything to do with it. Martin and Spingola discuss the issue briefly in this interview. http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/03/spingola-speaks-20130314.html
"Hitler was an illegitimate son of Rotschild himself" LOL
Whether hitler was a jew or not, 'israel' was the result of his agreements with the jews. You can prop him up as a demi-god if youd like, but thats just historically ignorant and intellectually foolish. The jews even have hitler fetishes in their disgusting porn industry in 'israel'. They love him for keeping them away from the bombing in cozy camps with movie theaters and swimming pools. If it wasn't for his route of action in dealing with them then they wouldn't have their precious homeland.
Benedict Klassen (Nature's Eternal Religion - and a slew of other books) knocked Hitler for pursuing nationalism and not racialism. Nationalism is just as easy to manipulate so it becomes chauvinism and overrides race consciousness. Witness WW1 and WW2 and plenty more back for 300 years.
This is another instance of conquest by population reduction, here achieved through selecting out the most vigorous part of the gene pool. Another example is initiatives for women to join fighting ranks and so forth. (Reflect on the fact that a single man may serve a harem and produce many offspring but a woman can't biologically do the equivalent).
One criticism I have of Deanna Spingola, Veronica Clarke/e etc etc in relation to their attempted rehabilition of Hitler's Germany is that they seem to ignore the fact of popular emotionality which assisted in the process of hijacking /misdirecting what initially were demands for territorial integrity based on ethnicity and undoing the injustice of Versailles 1919.
"Deutschland, Deutschland uber alles!" instead of peaceful co-existence, cannot be ignored. Pan-Germanism was a FACT and denying that is like denying that European nations were competing among themselves for overseas influence, grabs of resources and so on.
As usual there is evidence this channelled competitiveness was exploited by those having interests beyond national self-identity. Nesta Webster's Secret Societies and Subversive Movements has a short section covering Pan-"Germanism", as well as her other works.
Post a Comment