"This is the most impressive and comprehensive documentary I have seen that meticulously debunks the official 9/11 conspiracy theory point by point, laying waste to the official fiction with ruthless precision. Give it a watch."
Watch the video here: http://therealzcf.wordpress.com/2013/10/20/impressive-911-documentary-september-11-the-new-pearl-harbor/
2 comments:
I think no planes fits the evidence better than any other story. PTECH MITRE et all – Jewish software running the operation. Jews make up huge shit – Holocaust being a prime example of something which never happened – so why not 911? All you need are a number of Sayanim saying they saw planes, and you have your ‘witnesses’, like so many who ‘saw’ the gas chambers. Other real witness didn’t see a plane – so what – that does not prove there wasn’t one.
I watched also some of Simon Shack’s stuff. He is on to something but is not meticulous enough. For example he cites a helicopter ‘flying backwards’ as evidence of fakery. In the shot in question he never considers the possibility that the helicopter is stationary and the camera helicopter is moving forwards! Nevertheless it is obvious that conspiriacies involving large numbers of Jews are possible, and that is what 911 is all about. Since they control the flow of information, all they have to do is inject information to create the illusion that something is really happening.
The only strong argument I can think of against no planes is the possibility of someone having shot footage of the tower exploding and no plane being visible. It appears that there was some kind of electronic jamming in play that may have denied filming the crucial second plane hit, but there was always the possibility of a long distance film capture of the event by a real witness. However, lets say that 10 people independently caught the real event on film. What next? Post the footage on you-tube? Take it to the authorities? The media? Before any such footage could get wide circulation it would be intercepted. That could well have been the calculation by the planners
I guess I will give this video a try. I don't know if this is the new one by Massimo Masuco, the Italian Japanese guy who does quality video work. If anybody wants the link to that I will find it.
If this video is Simon Shack stuff, I agree with Rodin that his group is not meticulous enough. They did extensive research into the "deaths" of about 2999 victims listed on a CNN piece, but they did not record and tabulate and keep an orderly database of their data. When I think about it, I do not know how you would prove some real person was actually killed in the tower on 9-11, nor how you would prove they were not killed in that place at that time. Being on the SSDeathIndex or have a Death Certificate is no proof of anything these days --- witness Sandy Hook children.
James Fetzer and Morgan Reynolds have done the very best work about no Big Boeings crashing at the designated 4 sites. There were real planes with real people on them used as props in side or ancillary ways to prop up the official story.
Also see latest article by Dean Hartwell (blog on weebly) who wrote Planes Without Passengers on Dr. Fetzers 911sholars.ning forum.
We must NAME NAMES when we zero in on who the main planners of this event were. Two top names that keep presenting themsleves in our studies of 9-11 are Rabbi Dov Zackheim and Peter Zelikow.
There are many basic questions I have of the Simon Shack group but they are so defensive and combative that one cannot ask them a simple question. OneBornFree seems personable so I may pose some of my questions to him.
The SS people content that NOBODY, NO VICTIMS, NOT ONE PERSON, died in the towers. Why are they so extreme on that?
They claim there is some readily purchasable gadget that disable all computers, smart phones, and video cameras within a like 5 mile radius of the Towers so NOBODY had read video. They also claim all still photos are fake but doubt if gadget disables regular cameras.
Stil, their idea that there were many simulated victims, "vicsims", is sound, and certainly there were vicsims on the alleged 4 planes.
Also, as in Boston and Sandy Hook, there were many many actors throughout the 9-11 playout.
One last thing, the aftermath, the coverup phase of the event, was just as perfectly planned as was the rest of the event -- the Nanothermite Gangbusters took over the so called "9-11 truth movement" from very early on. They dominated and snuffed out all other good input and research by others who did not buy their "information" so they were part of the original evil plan too, in my opinion.
Post a Comment