I thought this interview with Dr. Paugh might shed some light on Werner Bok's legal crisis in Canada since Agenda 21 is threatening to take away his property -- but no go.
Nothing was said, implied, or asked in the interview in regard to Bok's plight -- even though South Dakota ranchers in the U.S. are suffering a similar plight as Werner Bok.
South Dakota farmers' cattle were destroyed by a "storm" so that their property could be taken over by Agenda 21.
What do you think of the debate between the 'global warmers' and the 'ice age now' camps? Iceagenow says that the storm that hit South Dakota is not necessarily man-made, but just a sign of what is to come -- namely the next ice age.
Certainly we are experiencing climate change. But in which direction?
I read arguments for both opinions. I'm having a hard time deciphering the truth because the intangible factor is man made weather control.
Whenever you have a big debate between two extremely different sides of an issue, and there is at the same time an elephant-in-the-living-room issue, weather modification capability, being totally ignored, you have a classic Hegelian dialectic situation. The two sides are meant to diaglogue to a predetermined solution or synthesis or compromise. The old democratic process applied to hard science.
5 comments:
I thought this interview with Dr. Paugh might shed some light on Werner Bok's legal crisis in Canada since Agenda 21 is threatening to take away his property -- but no go.
Nothing was said, implied, or asked in the interview in regard to Bok's plight -- even though South Dakota ranchers in the U.S. are suffering a similar plight as Werner Bok.
South Dakota farmers' cattle were destroyed by a "storm" so that their property could be taken over by Agenda 21.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/13/south-dakota-ranchers-reel-after-catastrophic-storm-leaves-up-to-100000-cattle/
Dr. Paugh does illuminate in this interview a new twist in the Agenda 21 onslaught on the people: DICED - the UN's Constitution FOR THE WORLD!!
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45370
Signifier -
What do you think of the debate between the 'global warmers' and the 'ice age now' camps? Iceagenow says that the storm that hit South Dakota is not necessarily man-made, but just a sign of what is to come -- namely the next ice age.
Certainly we are experiencing climate change. But in which direction?
I read arguments for both opinions. I'm having a hard time deciphering the truth because the intangible factor is man made weather control.
Any thoughts?
Whenever you have a big debate between two extremely different sides of an issue, and there is at the same time an elephant-in-the-living-room issue, weather modification capability, being totally ignored, you have a classic Hegelian dialectic situation. The two sides are meant to diaglogue to a predetermined solution or synthesis or compromise.
The old democratic process applied to hard science.
Certainly we are experiencing climate change, Roy? Only in the short term, where it was ever thus
Roy Hobs,
I lean towards Jeannon's viewpoint. Weather modification is THE issue.
Agenda 21 and weather modification work splendidly together for takeovers, don't you agree?
I do think we are experiencing global cooling, but these "storms" are suspect. . . .
Post a Comment