6 minutes in, he recaps Friday's coverage of the story of Samson allegedly killing 1000 men with the jawbone of an ass, which is obviously not possible, unless by some supernatural miracle, and therefore hints at some other purpose for the story.
Charlie may be right that this is the most comprehensive expose of Yahweh ever presented on radio.
A lot of this analysis was done during the 1800s, and most of it is taught in seminary schools, from an apologetics perspective, which is hidden from the masses.
One constructive criticism I have of Charlie is that he takes all the biblical stories literally, unless they say otherwise, and you really can't do that, nor were they intended to all be read that way.
There is definite typeology being used throughout, as Joseph Atwill refers to, of Jesus' temptation for 40 days and 40 nights, making him out to be the next Moses, in reference to the story of Moses and the Hebrews wandering in the desert for 40 years.
Yet, Charlie does raise the important point: how can one know what to take literally versus figuratively.
He doesn't take any of these stories literally. He exposes them for everyone to see they are fraudulent stories because we have all been taught that every single thing in that book was true.
4 comments:
6 minutes in, he recaps Friday's coverage of the story of Samson allegedly killing 1000 men with the jawbone of an ass, which is obviously not possible, unless by some supernatural miracle, and therefore hints at some other purpose for the story.
Charlie may be right that this is the most comprehensive expose of Yahweh ever presented on radio.
A lot of this analysis was done during the 1800s, and most of it is taught in seminary schools, from an apologetics perspective, which is hidden from the masses.
One constructive criticism I have of Charlie is that he takes all the biblical stories literally, unless they say otherwise, and you really can't do that, nor were they intended to all be read that way.
There is definite typeology being used throughout, as Joseph Atwill refers to, of Jesus' temptation for 40 days and 40 nights, making him out to be the next Moses, in reference to the story of Moses and the Hebrews wandering in the desert for 40 years.
Yet, Charlie does raise the important point: how can one know what to take literally versus figuratively.
In any case, Yahweh definitely is bloodthirsty.
I think the slaying the goy with a jaw bone of an ass refers to CNN and Fox News.
charlie for the love of no god could you stop talking about the bible and jews for a while, you have exhausted your faithful audience loooong ago
He doesn't take any of these stories literally. He exposes them for everyone to see they are fraudulent stories because we have all been taught that every single thing in that book was true.
Post a Comment