Why would AIPAC protect Saudis from 9/11 probe?

Which raises another burning question: Why would AIPAC want to protect the Saudis? The many “leaks” bandied about (or should we say Bandared about) in the mainstream media all point to the Saudis as the culprits who attacked America on 9/11, according to the Joint Congressional Report’s redacted pages. Yet Israel is lobbying Congress to cover it up.
Are the leaks blaming the Saudis a misdirection ploy? Could it be that the “one or more” foreign intelligence agencies involved in the planning and execution of 9/11 included the Israeli Mossad?
Look at where the “blame the Saudis” leaks are coming from. Paul Sperry, author of the New York Post article on the Lynch and Jones request, works for the Hoover Institute, an Israel-affiliated neocon think tank. The Post itself is one of New York’s several Israeli propaganda outfits that pose as newspapers. Sperry claims that “unnamed CIA sources” told him the redacted pages of the Joint Report implicate the Saudis. Do those “CIA sources” really think the Saudis have the covert-ops capacity, political clout, and motive to attack the US and get away with it? Or is Sperry, and his real or imaginary sources, doing what the Hoover Institute and the New York Post always do: Fronting for Israel?
***Read article at Veterans Today***

*More info.