When it comes to his coverage of UFOs, Rense is no better than the Jewish Zionist chauvinist propaganda artists at Coast to Coast AM, in mixing in discussion of the provable (usury-based monetary system, the latest three Federal Reserve chairpersons, last World Bank president and last IMF Director were Jewish) with a completely speculative topic like UFOs that most people regard as nutty, when there are otherwise perfectly rational explanations for the phenomenon.
The only difference is that Coast to Coast AM intentionally does it, whereas Rense is at best negligently doing so.
And lest someone say what about those, including myself, who have pointed to evidence of crisis actors as similarly being regarded as nutty. The difference is, we can point to pieces of evidence that people can use to verify and form their own conclusions, whereas so much of the UFO claims are based on eyewitness testimony and speculation that you can't verify after the fact.
Wait, this guy calls into Rense and peddles a story about seeing a UFO over Lake Tahoe using semi-technical jargon to add credibility. Then, we find out dude was at the Fukushima Tepco plant on 3/11, and witnessed the tsunami. That's unbelievable, but Rense uses this to setup the the "Fukushima buildings were damaged by the earth quake meme" which is total bullshit. They were blown up and Rense is a total shill.
2 comments:
When it comes to his coverage of UFOs, Rense is no better than the Jewish Zionist chauvinist propaganda artists at Coast to Coast AM, in mixing in discussion of the provable (usury-based monetary system, the latest three Federal Reserve chairpersons, last World Bank president and last IMF Director were Jewish) with a completely speculative topic like UFOs that most people regard as nutty, when there are otherwise perfectly rational explanations for the phenomenon.
The only difference is that Coast to Coast AM intentionally does it, whereas Rense is at best negligently doing so.
And lest someone say what about those, including myself, who have pointed to evidence of crisis actors as similarly being regarded as nutty. The difference is, we can point to pieces of evidence that people can use to verify and form their own conclusions, whereas so much of the UFO claims are based on eyewitness testimony and speculation that you can't verify after the fact.
Wait, this guy calls into Rense and peddles a story about seeing a UFO over Lake Tahoe using semi-technical jargon to add credibility. Then, we find out dude was at the Fukushima Tepco plant on 3/11, and witnessed the tsunami. That's unbelievable, but Rense uses this to setup the the "Fukushima buildings were damaged by the earth quake meme" which is total bullshit.
They were blown up and Rense is a total shill.
Post a Comment