In 1937, Ferdinand Lundberg published a work called America’s 60 Families based on years of tax records back to 1924, investigating the super-rich and many of these Dutch families from New York in which he quoted:
"The United States is owned and dominated today by a hierarchy of its sixty richest families, buttressed by no more than ninety families of lesser wealth... These families are the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States, functioning discreetly under a de jure democratic form of government behind which a de facto government, absolutist and plutocratic in its lineaments, has gradually taken form since the Civil War. This de facto government is actually the government of the United States -- informal, invisible, shadowy. It is the government of money in a dollar democracy."
You have probably heard of many of the names such as Astor, Du Pont, Vanderbilt, Sulzberger, Van Eeghen, Roosevelt, Guggenheim, Gettys, Schiff, Dulles, Warburg, Blumenthal, Rosenwald and many others including those enforcer families welcomed into the fold such as the Rockefellers, the Morgans and the Bushes.
Read more here
True History of America -Part 1 (1666-1840): The Curse against the Patriots
True History of America Part 2 (1840-1939): The False God of Perpetual War
Download
6 comments:
I'm listening to the first segment now. It sounds like another retard guy talking about admiralty law and the Vatican but not about the Jews.
He's trying to blame the London fire of 1666 on King Charles. Retard.
His article cites many acts and other relevant documents, but then he jumps to these grand conclusions that are not factually supported. This is like listening to my sister make an argument.
For example, he concludes that George Washington was a sociopath, with zero factual support. He talks about the "black pope" being behind everything. I find mode of operation to be the general fallacy throughout.
This is the really sh*tty type of "scholarship" the internet is infamous for. Here's a good rule of thumb: If the person is talking about the Jesuits and the black pope, but doesn't talk about the Jews, he is either an idiot, or a coward. Either way, I have no time for this.
he is either an idiot, or a coward
You left out "agent".
I'm convinced people like this guy and "the Spaceman" are getting paid. There has to be money involved as a motivator.
Just being a coward doesn't make much sense.
I don't think the Spaceman is a coward. He is being rewarded somehow - someway.
When you jump into the middle of 20 years of documented research, read a small fragment of it, then claim it to be lacking factual support (even though there is well over 1million web pages of documentation spread over 50 websites) then the phrase 'condemnation without investigation' comes to mind.
Here is a man, Frank O'Collins, who is selling nothing, that has published his research of over 20 years of forensic analysis of the Acts of Westminster along with thousands of other 'founding' documents, treaties etc... and all he asks anyone to do is to 'think for themselves', read and discern the truth; and all you guys have to add is to call him a 'retard'...
Wow, I can tell you are all very serious about your 'scholarly' logic.
And, no, he does not talk about the Black Pope being behind everything, instead he uncloaks the entire idea to its naked roots and exposes it for exactly what it is, but, alas, idiots, disinformation artists and peanut gallery shills would rather condemn then discern for themselves based on the volumes of WELL DOCUMENTED historical evidence... go ahead, read the Acts themselves, the documents that commissioned the Pirates, the registration information on the companies, the Acts that granted them their naval fleet in exchange for their accomplishing their Privateering goals and so SO SO much more...
@GrnEydGuy, I remember your handle from the calls, dude - these morons who blindly chastise without researching UCADIA have no clue how to form a competent argument based on logic. I wouldn't even exchange my time with them if I were you... Take care
Hey Jonathan! Good advice my friend, but for those who come to read this later I think it's important for them to get a better idea of the volume of works relating to the post. Good on ya brother
Post a Comment