Jason's 9/11 analysis of video and media fakery, scripted witnesses, and unsubstantiated death counts.
64k CF Download
Jason Erb' site
Truth Frequency Radio Archive
September 13, 2014
Exposing Faux Capitalism with Jason Erb 2014.09.13
Jason's 9/11 analysis of video and media fakery, scripted witnesses, and unsubstantiated death counts.
64k CF Download
Jason Erb' site
Truth Frequency Radio Archive
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
The reported victims family members should also had some Facebook groups, but we have few, if ANY. Ten thousands of victims aunts should be eager to share their stories and memories of their loved ones, and all kinds of NEW PHOTOS, but no. Why is that? No FB groups for the victims family members in the biggest news story in this millennium? The reason is that these victim family members don exist, of course. No real victim family members=no real victims.
No one died and no one got hurt in this operation. Hence, no one is involved in a conspiracy to murder with no statute of limitations. I'm sure the pressitutes on the Team for Special Operations appreciate that!
So obviously, to protect their most valuable tools in these media operations (the national news anchors et al), and to make the recruitment to this operation easier, they run the operation as legal as possible. Deception or fake news is not illegal, but free speech and protected by the 1st amendment.
Very nice show, btw.
It is not known that anyone died, Nick Dean, even if it often looks that way in many other Hollywood movies too. No one is ever killed for real in these movies - they simply fake it. We do not even have a tear anywhere, just like in the Sandy Hook Hoax. No tears=no victims.
If they could fake plane crashes on live news, and have their top Gov agents back up this Big Lie, they certainly also can fake ALL the victims too, and keep the entire operation away from a conspiracy to murder with no statute of limitations. Let someone else get blood on their hands.
No one even slightly critical to the official conspiracy theory has ever interviewed any of these millions of reported victim family members, how come? Not even 1!
Do you have any slightly credible victim family member that you can share with us?
***
Nick Dean, I like the Spinning WTC: https://www.youtube.com/user/Fijitime2012/search?query=spinning
At 0:37 the shadows of the 2 guys cast in the exact opposite direction:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6CSYgfd65A
Also, where did all the dust in the streets come from before WTC2 fell? (NIST 2009 stuff).
- and also all these different sky colors, including green and purple. Study the worst of all the "live" broadcasts and see how many you cant count? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQdpTzqh8Ag
First witness interviewed on "live" news (6:37) looks like he is software. Lots and lots of nonsense in this broadcast if you know what to look for.
Buggo is another in a long line of hyttan pushers.
If you like the very positive consept no one died and no one got hurt 911, Negentropic has a fantastic post that I highly will recommend for both hyttan pushers and non-hyttan pushers here:
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/09/11/called-into-truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani-about-911/#comments
Thanks, ND. If Negentropic argue that someone was killed or hurt 911, someone should tell him that he may be too soft - or maybe he hasn't developed completely yet?
Took me 3y ND, to go from a few real victims to no real victims. Not so easy to admit this. Its like I envy the lolohoax deniers for promoting such a moderate claim.
Why ND, didn't they present 1 of the real victim family members 911 instead of this silly fake son, if they had any? WARNING: CROCODILE TEARS!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtGN8z9aEqs
I think it would be good for the credibility of the victims part of the story if they had shown us some real victim family members and some real tears, if they had any. That's the problem I guess, they didn't have any, so they used actors instead.
This victim part of the story is VERY crucial. Together with the crashing plane part (with the foreign hijackers) it is THE basis for the War on Terror and all this other nonsense we have to go along with. No victims (and planes), no basis for the WoT, etc.
These two parts (and the MSM complicity) is what the controlled opposition REALLY want to protect. Lets talk about ANYTHING but this!
Death toll was inflated for emotional impact. Much like their other go to emotion jerking, the Holohoax. Same group, same jews.The very group hyttan conveniently leaves out, on purpose. Gate keeping. Negentropics long winded and overly dense comments would do far more to help, if condensed. People died, did 3,000? money says, no. To say nobody died at all in the whole event is naive and ridiculous. This idea that nobody died is pushed for people to think, hey its not that bad, nothing is wrong. Just a little psyop, no harm no foul. Which you should know is never the jews agenda.
ND, if interested, here is the most stupid and staged "documentary" I am aware of re 911. Listen to all those silly scripted comments - its mindboggling that anyone can believe this stuff:
http://www.vanadia.com/nycstories/my-911/story/
Thanks chris, for your rational comment.
First of, no one was killed in gas chambers - that is a pure lie. In case anyone was poisoned by gas in the work camps, it was due to a terrible accident, and I am not aware of any such accidents, so again, NO ONE was killed by gas in the work camps.
There are some rational reasons for not pointing out the man behind the curtain at every opportunity. A you very well kno, the resistance may be very forceful, and take attention away fro other points. So if you want to spread the message that the MSM was complicit in the 911 operation, you cant get that message across since everyone is talking about the jews instead - the message will be drowned. I like the term "the network". That is code word for you favorite suspect, and we can still discuss the topic Fakeology without being derailed by jew discussions, etc. Everyone with an IQ >70 should understand what "the network" is code word for anyway.
Gatekeeping? Maybe, you have to be able to interpret "the network" yourself.
I'm afraid Negentropic couldn't tell the WHOLE story in his long post, so it, in a way, was too short to present the whole case. My comments are much shorter, since I can barely spell at all.
3000 killed 911? The evidence we normally should expect to find, if the reports were true, simply isn't there. No tears, No relevant Facebook groups, silly actors as victims family members, To few entries in the Social Security Death Index, etc, etc.
They have lied a million times in this operation, why should we absolutely trust the victim part of the story when SO MUCH else have been lies? They do not have any credibility at all, so why the hell should we believe the victim part of the story?
It is pretty bad, that the jews that control the media could fake plane crashes on live news AND have their controlled top agents in the Gov back up this lie too.
They can fool everyone when they control the media, and thereby the election process, and have control on the gang on Capitol Hill. That should be bad enough, and much, much worse than a few victims if you ask me.
I could go on the whole day if I had to...
Thanks for your support and veru useful links, El Buggo.
Chris, as for Simon Shack not implicating Jews in 9/11, he wrote this 2012 post ( http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2375031&sid=cdb63227fa0b724c8a36e99408396470#p2374765 ), showing that he is well aware of their involvement, and got fed up over the issue one time he was on Abirato's show, and named Larry Silverstein, Steven Rosenbaum, Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein as key players, making it apparent that he was highlighting their obviously Jewish lineages, and for those who didn't pick up on it at the time, on another show, he expressly asked, "don't Jews own the media?"
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/04/07/summary-of-september-clues-simon-shack-march-17-2013-interview-on-radio-abirato/
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/01/30/summary-of-fakeologist-radio-episode-85-with-simon-shack-and-onebornfree/
Nick,
Regarding your statement about this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQdpTzqh8Ag
"The quality and colour of the footage really is bizarre. It was known to be a bright, blue-skied day. There are copious examples of TV and even amateur film of the New York skyline taken on similar days that do not have these image quality problems. Very odd."
Look at 1h 11m 10s, where they have a split screen "live" view of the Towers, with the one shot looking like Mars and the other one mostly blue (but still less clear than it should've been).
Given that the orangish, scary looking skyline was across all the networks at different times, along with other anomalies, I do suspect this done on purpose, and I would like to hear even a single clip of any of the anchors and reporters that day from NYC point to how obviously strange it is to have such a skyline on a perfectly blue sky morning, and not hearing any say that, it leads me to conclude they were in on the operation that day.
Corrigendum: I intended to spell "the Nutwork" as a code for anyone's favorite suspect, but the spell checker didn't like that and change it to "the network".
ND, another problem with your "maybe 500 real victims" is what these real victim family members will say to that they will be missing so many other family membe for so many of the other victims. "Where are they?" they wil ask. And what should the 911 operation mange tell them?
Angry bankers family members, with access to uptown lawyers wouldn't have been so simple for the 911 operation management to cope with either - they could have made a lot of fuss.
Just fake them all! So much better to have total control on the operation, and avoid big surprises.
Here is what the real 911 Memorial Service 2009 looked like - scroll down to image 34:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/09/remembering_september_11th.html
How many victims family members can you spot there? 9? 11? Not many. Should have been thousands.
This is maybe the evidence I can find to prove that there aren't any real victims family members.
It is impossible to prove that no one died and no one got hurt 911. What convinced me was looking at the incentives for creating an operation without real victims. I've identified enough good reason for avoiding killings. I'll eat my keyboard if you even can make me doubt this.
Post a Comment