News Page Deanna's site
Official chat room Spingola Speaks .Info
32k CF Download
December 14, 2014
Spingola Speaks 2014.12.14
News Page Deanna's site
Official chat room Spingola Speaks .Info
32k CF Download
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Three minutes in, it was mentioned that no one questioned whether Russell Yates was an actor for smiling (at his wife in the courtroom) after she had reportedly killed all of their children, yet within 24 hours, people were saying Robbie Parker was an actor.
I'm glad this issue came up because I am convinced that some "nearly everything is fake" sites and personalities are deliberate disinfo purveyors, and in any case, have fallen into the trap sprung by others with that very intention.
That being said, I do think that important events have been faked to varying degrees (Boston Marathon bombing with actor Jeff Bauman, for instance) and are continuing to be faked, and I think that the efforts of those promoting that nearly every big media event is faked serves several useful purposes including smearing legitimate researchers, diverting legitimate research and also serving as a test to see if they can get away with even more fakery.
Taking Columbine as an example, it's not that it wasn't faked. It could very well have been. The pan/mass fakery meme had to be inserted into discourse now, and not at the time, because more and more people were and would get even more wise to fakery in past, current and future events, and I think the deliberate attempt has been made to try to discredit rational consideration.
You see, maybe Columbine was faked but it wasn't necessary to bring that into the equation at the time because too many people were too much in the dark about any fakery being employed in any big event but as more things came out organically, their hand was forced.
And you know what they say about first impressions, so if you first thought something was suspicious about Robbie Parker's reaction, then why not go with your first impression in the absence of hard evidence in the other way. And if your first impression was the opposite, go with that until hard evidence comes to you the other way. But in any case, the burden of proof always relies on the one making any claim.
Keith, 11 minutes in, regarding you deciding to go on Alex Jones' Nightly News show, it's really better that you didn't, as Alex Jones is a known, and I daresay treasonous disinfo agent of the highest order, and it's why, for instance, I would never go on his show personally nor have I sent him any of my articles once I truly found out what he was all about in 2012.
And you declared war on his operation on March 1, 2012, as I happily wrote about at the time.
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2012/04/20/keith-johnson-still-listed-as-an-infowars-com-writer-despite-blasting-them-on-march-1-2012/
great comments faux
Yes, faux, very interesting first comment.
Post a Comment