Each of these events introduced some variant of socialism into a major country — i.e., Bolshevik socialism in Russia, New Deal socialism in the United States, and National socialism in Germany.
Contemporary academic histories, with perhaps the sole exception of Carroll Quigley's Tragedy And Hope, ignore this evidence. On the other hand, it is understandable that universities and research organizations, dependent on financial aid from foundations that are controlled by this same New York financial elite, would hardly want to support and to publish research on these aspects of international politics. The bravest of trustees is unlikely to bite the hand that feeds his organization.
It is also eminently clear from the evidence in this trilogy that "public-spirited businessmen" do not journey to Washington as lobbyists and administrators in order to serve the United States. They are in Washington to serve their own profit-maximizing interests. Their purpose is not to further a competitive, free-market economy, but to manipulate a politicized regime, call it what you will, to their own advantage.
It is business manipulation of Hitler's accession to power in March 1933 that is the topic of
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.
30 comments:
Scorp, send it to Rodney Martin, Deanna Spingola, or Carolyn Yeager and you'll get a collective yawn.
The jews and their lackey have thrown so much shit against Uncle Adolph that it no longer resonates amongst us who know.
I bet your Herr Professor believes in the Shoah.
I'm not a "Hitler lover"; this war has been going on long before Hitler. One could look up Antiochus or Titus Flavius.
Nobody's clean in this war, but using your classication system, I'd have to desribe myself as a "Titus Flavius Lover" (not in a queer way).
This is old and tired argumentum. Peace out.
oi vey lol guess scorpio never listened to any spingola shows or read or watched anything posted on mamis in the last 3 years.
(he was too busy blaming the freemasons and the naughtsies lol)
this jim condit type material was entertaining in 2008...... (have to give credit to condit though he at least names the zionists, sutton is alex jones stuff blaming the banksters lol)
Hey, Timbo - I am well aquainted with Spingola and all the rest if it as well. I just don't want to be thrown in a tard coral and pretend like Hitler was some magnanimous character. Both sides in WWII were dirty and I believe the entire conflict was orchestrated from above.
The whole point of the book isn't how 'evil' Hitler was, but to expose the fact that Hitler was built up and funded by (Jewish) Wall Street to create the best enemy money can buy - just like the (jewish) Bolsheviks This old trick has been used countless times throughout history. (Saddam Hussein immediately comes to mind).
My guess is that you didn't bother to read the book before commenting. It's a simple fact of history that without Hitler and the holoco$t, there would be no Israel. Without the calamity of WWII, we would not have the massive military industrial complex or the spying apparatus that goes along with it. Just because I disapprove of the jewish power structure we live under now, does not mean I have to jump aboard the nazi-train. Expand your horizons a little and don't be so afraid to read things that take you out of your comfort zone.
Jews are planned opportunists, they tried the holohoax after WWI, blaming 6 million jew deaths on the tsar and to set up the league of nations so they could have israel then, that failed cause their control was not big enough yet. So blaming the creation of israel on hitler/nazis is..............
You're obviously in the jim condit camp, like i said before, even though many of his stuff has been debunked by people like spingola who you are 'aquainted' with.
Jews want an international jew world order, national socialism goes economically, demographically, and geographically in the other direction, weird how you put that economic nationalistic system down................
even though it would destroy the wallstreet bankster system as you call it. I've noticed you started to use the word jew ( since 6 months?) whatever happened to your 'peak jew' view? ( making fun of those that call out the jew)
The really smart guys (even if some of them are Gay):
http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/12/german-big-business-and-the-rise-of-hitler/
(...)
This brings to mind the work of a non-mainstream, anti-Communist academic and later independent writer not mentioned by Turner, Antony C. Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (Seal Beach, Calif.: ’76 Press, 1976). I own that book, and Sutton relies heavily not only on the bogus memoirs attributed to Thyssen, but other fraudulent “authorities” such as Jewish journalist Ladislas Farago. His untenable thesis is the same as Leftists’ and Jews’: “The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations before 1940 can only be described as phenomenal”—“certainly crucial to German military capabilities.”
(...)
did some research on the word jew in suttons book and youtube interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pwxo_UQjSvI Interview -- Professor Antony Sutton: Wall Street & the rise of Hitler Interview with Doctor Anthony C Sutton on his research about the funding of Nazi party and of Soviet communists by a group of American and European financiers and industrialists. ´the invisible goverment´ NICE lol
at 6:40 min he says he has no ties whatsoever while wearing a freemasonic tie lol
page 7 But whatever we call this self-perpetuating elitist group, it is apparently fundamentally significant in the determination of world affairs, at a level far
behind and above that of the elected politicians.
The influence and work of this same group in the rise of Hitler and Nazi Germany is the
topic of this book. NICE lol
page 69 on henry ford Henry Ford's protestations of innocence suggest, as we shall see in this chapter, that he did not approve of Jewish financiers profiting from war (as some have), but if anti-Semitic
Morgan3 and Ford profited from war that was acceptable, moral and "constructive." 'anti-semitic' kosher ADL lol
page 72 This was the same Secretary Long who one year later
suppressed private messages through the State Department concerning the extermination of Jews in Europe. he supports the holohoax narrative lol
page 113 it is unlikely "Sidney Warburg" would have missed this observation if he was deliberately purveying false anti-Semitic propaganda. lol
page 116 Not only were the German Warburgs persecuted by Hitler in 1938, but millions of Jews lost their lives to Nazi barbarism. lol
Basically he blames WASP nazi white anti semitic bankers and industrialists (who he calls the invisible goverment) for funding the barbaric nazis who killed 6 million jews oj vey lol Dov cohen and Alex jones will be proud of this lol
Tim - I've Never even heard of Jim Condit and I'm not in anyones camp - Just a guy trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together. I posted Sutton's book as an opportunity to learn, not because I agree with every word the man wrote.
As for Spingola, she's done some great work, but anyone who claims that Sandy Hook was completely real (as she does) shows that Diana doesn't have all the answers either.
I've known about the jewish issue for 20 years, so your implication that I only started using that term 6 months ago is ludicrous.
Obviously, there are errors in Sutton's book, but one must take in account his academic background and the time when it was written. Unlike yourself, I don't look to any one book or belief system for all the answers. The very notion that the Wall Street/banking cabal may have helped fund Hitler and the Bolsheviks should raise some serious red flags. If you want to believe otherwise - that's fine too. Have a nice life.
Jin Condit(Jnr) is a Hitler Historian and baby threatener lol
"I'll throw bombs through your windows!" -Jim Condit Jr. (Terrorist threat to M. Bedel, his sister-in-law)
From http://www.jimconditjr.com/
Nice Bloke! 5 Restraining Orders since 2011!
Hitler has been absolutely smeared by the jews over the last 60 years. It just makes me wonder when someone on "our" side is also doing it. There are certain "litmus" tests that have to be implemented.
You're obviously an expert in "Smearing" ProGoyim, (Nice reinforcement of a Jewish Meme in your handle btw).
No one who has "Done The research" doubts the efficacy of the Economic and Societal changes implemented in Germany from 1933 until 1939. But to claim that a political Figurehead and mouthpiece for a whole political movement was solely responsible is rather far fetched. There were multiple economic theologians and philosophers who contributed towards the structure of the changes within German political thinking. And like so many similar democracies across the world,the introduction of the Industrial,commercial and financial policies were conducted by many bureaucratic minds within the Governmental Institutions and departments. A Nation is only as good as it's Civil Service after all.
Governments come and go. But the Bureaucracy behind the political scenes hardly changes. And that's where the real power lies. Wielded by the inductees of various Secret Societies and ancient Belief systems alike. Not to mention the ancient Family Bloodlines that run through History from Sumer and Babylon until today. No political Leader has ever been elevated to the Top Job without the approval and ongoing support of those with vested interests to put them there.
Those that exercise true power always do so from behind such smoke-screens; free from public scrutiny, and Historical record.
Thus, the guilable are always directed to watch the Visible puppetry that occurs at Governmental level:All the Actors are chosen well in advance of their actual placements via corruptible electoral systems. Public opinion is swayed by careful application of tried and tested social engineering techniques that have been developed and practised for millennia. Nothing is really new when it comes to setting stages for pre-planned Historical events that advance the Minority Elitist Family agendas.
Scorp does well to keep pointing out the sleight of hand that occurs when interested parties continue to guide you to watch what happens publicly. It really is mostly shadow theatre of the most commonly practised sort. And anyone trying to convince you that Historical Figures like Hitler are worthy of the fanaticism that is fanned by current Jewish interests is rather naive. Visible Hitler Fanaticism does nothing except provide a nice,big target for Jewish Interests to point to today and claim that "They're *STILL* So Poy-see-cuted"! Thus reducing the minute chance of ever effectively challenging the plans for the world currently under their stewardship.
What do the puppet makers fear? They fear a true and independent puppet-master hating nationalist that is propelled by unstoppable people power. I would not assume the impossibility of a figure of this caliber arising in the past, present, or future.
Stanford is the repository where Herbert Hoover placed the massive records that 1,500 agents collected following World War I, when people were still reading. He and his agents collected trainloads of evidence throughout Europe to conceal the people who actually initiated World War I. People do not have access to those official records. The same can be said of the Smithsonian, now under the control of Sumner Redstone and his media apparatus. Stanford also sponsors and houses Spielberg’s growing Shoah collection of “evidence” of the holocaust. Stanford banned Eric Hunt from its campus and from this “evidence.”. Antony Sutton, who consistently fails to mention jewish influence, was a professor at Stanford.
Hitler, following World War I vociferously opposed both the banker-backed Dawes Plan and the Young Plan for Germany. Following his popular election, because of his economic plan that totally excluded usury-inflatable money and, international jewry declared economic warfare on Germany and swore to destroy Hitler as well as Germany, a country they long had a vendetta against (since 1848). Hitler threw the bankers out of the country, rebuilt the economy, put millions of people back to work, rebuilt the infrastructure, all without borrowing from the bankers but based on human productivity.
The foundation of Sutton’s book is consensus- driven, not based on evidence, facts or the economic success and resultant happiness and satisfaction of the German population. Just because a large portion of the people believe that something is true does not make it a fact. Leaving the comfort of the herd requires that one read and understand an alternative view based on evidence instead of accepting consensus thinking. The jews themselves have promoted the idea that they funded Hitler in books like Sutton’s and in another “popular” book, written by a jew, titled Trading with the Enemy. Both are propaganda, designed to do exactly what they did – take the focus off of the economic success that Germany accomplished in a relatively short period of time, all without the bankers. Meanwhile, the US, always under the control of the bankers has floundered for decades, outsourced its labor, is morally decayed and is in dire straits.
Needless to say, this is more information Hitler lovers will not want to read.
A very juvenile statement Scorpio.
Listening to your podcasts -- which I have enjoyed -- I figured you to be a wise and mature man in his late 30's early 40's.
I would agree that to place Hitler on a pedestal of a 'god' would fall under the category of "Hitler lover". But I would guess that most of us just want the truth. Period.
The "jewish Question" was available to Anthony Sutton. The works of Henry Ford come to mind. You can't research history and not stumble across it.
Why Sutton did not discuss the 'jewish question' is disturbing and very telling.
I believe Deanna is right on this one.
Next time just post the book and let the reader "beware". No commentary needed.
Roy - Perhaps using the term ' HItler lover' was juvenile, but I used the term partly to judge people's reaction to it. Clearly there are some here who put HItler on a pedestal and are unwilling to look more deeply into how such a 'threat' could be created. Look at all the anger directed towards just posting a book.
In today's world, I see similar machinations at work creating new 'threats' requiring military responses. The stage is being set for WWIII and ultimately, it does not really matter who 'starts' the war or whose fault it is. what matters is that the war happens. Is it so hard to believe that WWII was orchestrated with pre-determined goals in mind? Hitler did have some good ideas, but I honestly think he was caught up in a game much bigger than he imagined. By the end of WWII, Germany was left in ruins and in much worse shape than when Hitler took power - that much cannot be denied. The stage was then set for the creation of Israel because of the holoco$t. Just because propaganda has been drilled into our heads that 'Hitler was the most evil man in history' does not necessarily mean that the converse is true either.
As for Diana's contention that Wall Street Jews funding Hitler is 'consensus reality' I must disagree. Very few if any people in the mainstream would even entertain such an idea - in fact, quite the opposite. The consensus reality is that the Jews were innocent victims that couldn't possibly have had a hand in creating such a force.
Finally, nobody seems to be looking at the fact that Sutton's contention was that Wall Street helped fund Hitler, The Bolsheviks and the rise of Roosevelt - the three main players in WWII. I'm not defending everything the man wrote or believed, just offering the information for a different perspective.
Now that's the Scorpio I enjoy and have respect for!
Thanks for the reply. I enjoy your perspective(s) on life.
Hitler did have some good ideas, but I honestly think he was caught up in a game much bigger than he imagined. By the end of WWII, Germany was left in ruins and in much worse shape than when Hitler took power - that much cannot be denied.
A no-truer statement.
Beautifully spoke.
The point is that Wall Street did not finance Hitler. The iron, coal, and steel industries readily accepted Hitler’s policies while Germany’s export-oriented businesses, particularly the chemical and electrical industries, did not. Historian Henry Ashby Jr. had access to West and East German archives and to the records of industrial conglomerates and found that industries from late 1930
onward made donations to Hitler while also donating to the Centre
Party and other right-wing parties. Hugenberg and his party would
have served the interests of big business much better than Hitler,
whose greatest financial support came from NSDAP members.
Though often unemployed, they still made personal sacrifices for
the party. Krupp, part of Germany’s heavy industry, did not support
Hitler until he became chancellor.
According to Joseph Goebbels’s diary, the NSDAP coffers were almost empty by late 1932. Yet, according to Marxist propagandists, the party had plenty of money. By 1923, industrialist Fritz Thyssen, impressed by Hitler, began making large donations to the NSDAP. By 1928, Thyssen’s United Steelworks controlled 75 percent of Germany’s iron ore reserves and employed two hundred thousand people. In November 1932, Thyssen and Hjalmar Schacht urged Hindenburg to appoint Hitler. Thyssen joined the NSDAP in 1933.
Hitler also had financial support from Emil Georg von Stauss, who sat on the board of at least thirty companies and was on the committee of the supervisory board of the Deutsche Bank from 1915 to 1932.
Stauss, like most businessmen, attempted to build political ties to whatever government was in power and was especially close to Göring. He had initially introduced Schacht to
Hitler and to Göring.49 For an elaboration on Hitler’s funding, read
Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding of Hitler’s Rise to Power
1919-1933 by James and Suzanne Pool. A myth perpetuated by Sidney Warburg holds that Jewish bankers funded Hitler. Warburg claimed that Hitler received $10 million from Kuhn, Loeb and Company in 1929 and another $15 million in 1931 and $7 million
in 1933.
Marquis W. Childs, a journalist and author of Sweden: The Middle
Way (1936), reports that, while he was in Europe, he discovered
that “a man named Davis, with a grudge against Standard Oil, for
allegedly ruining him, conspired to form a giant combine to ship oil
to Germany.” Apparently, Standard and Shell tankers had refused to
transport oil to Germany. According to Childs, Sir Henri Deterding, of Royal Dutch Shell, was working with Hitler and backed him with “a huge sum of money when the NSDAP was about to fail.” Deterding supposedly supported Hitler because he hoped that Hitler
would attack Russia, allowing Royal Dutch Shell to seize the Baku
oil fields.
Accusing someone of "putting him on a pedestal", with respect to the character and achievements of Hitler, reveals an ugly prejudice not becoming of a serious student of history. Sometimes rare individuals arise from the masses and go on to distinguish themselves in such a way that they wind up "on a pedestal", whether anyone wants to acknowledge it, or not. There are ample books and videos from those closest to Hitler that reveal his ranking should be one of "rarely achieved by others". But anyone can choose to believe as they will.
As to the state of affairs in Germany after the war, it is cheap, delusional, and highly prejudicial to blame a victim for horrible atrocities visited upon him, when a more sane approach would be to put the blame where it belongs, on the perpetrators.
When someone makes a point that some bankers outside Germany "helped" in the rise of the NSDAP, and we are supposed to ponder that as being somehow an important aspect of history, I smell prejudice. "Helping" can be small and insignificant, or large and overwhelming. Which is it?
If anyone wants to study the early financing of the NSDAP, and the later financing of Germany starting in 1933, one can see that it was the German's themselves, who made the investments that allowed for the incredible rise in German power. Any outside "investments" that are uncovered by anti-german pundits, are just being blown out of proportion to further degrade the remarkable achievements by the german peoples.
Deanna - As I have previously stated, I have a great deal of respect for much of your work. However, the notion that German industrialists/financiers weren't interconnected to some degree with their American counterparts via secret societies/bloodlines strikes me as a bit naive. WWII was cooked up and orchestrated from above - there were no 'good guys' and Millions of white people killed each other as the result. The bottom line is that I hold a more conspiratorial view of history than yourself, which is why I believe Sandy Hook to have been a massive hoax, and you do not.
Quote Scorpio
"As for Spingola, she's done some great work, but anyone who claims that Sandy Hook was completely real (as she does) shows that Diana doesn't have all the answers either. "
You realize this is a huge strawman right? It's like saying, if person A is guilty of crime A, then person A must also be guilty of crime B.
The best way to find out if Hitler was a puppet or not, is simply to look at what the Jewish controlled establishment keeps saying about him. Whenever they say something, the exact opposite tends to be where the truth is found.
Everything is upside down with these people.
You may now engage in a long exhausted piece of bla bla. I don't give a shit.
It is delusional to presume that the international jews knew, in advance, that the winter of 1941 would come early, and be so harsh and cold, that the mighty, highly professional, motorized german army's advance would be halted just outside the skirts of Moscow.
Had these jews not know about that (the early winter), then, if someone thinks they were helping the Germans in some important way, then one has to believe these jews were risking the almost certainty that Stalin and his gaggle of jewish bolshevics would have been captured, paraded through the streets of Moscow, put on trial, and executed for crimes against humanity. These jews would have been risking the loss of their most significant, and massive, victory in their history - the capture of the great Russian peoples and that humongous land mass.
That would have freed up 90% of the german army to deal with the UK, who, rather than be invaded and defeated, would have seen the light and made a peace treaty, leaving only the US and Japan to duke it out on their own.
A belief in such fantastical visionary talents of jews (to go ahead and significantly aid Hitler because they knew in advance he would fail), suggests a prejudicial flat refusal to accept that the Germans, under the leadership of Hitler and the NSDAP, represents one of the most admirable efforts of all time to overcome the evils of jewish dominance and strive for a great ennoblement of their peoples.
Scorpio, Presumably you have read each of my three 700+ page books about the Civil War, World War I and World War II and you assume to know exactly what I think about Sandy Hook despite the fact that I have not yet released my very comprehensive book on that subject. You said, referring to me that, "The bottom line is that I (you)hold a more conspiratorial view of history than yourself (Spingola), which is why I believe Sandy Hook to have been a massive hoax, and you do not." You have amazing mental powers; I am incredibly impressed by your omnipotence. It is interesting that you would choose to interject the Sandy Hook issue in as much as this conversation is about Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.
Neither irony or sarcasm is argument. - Samuel Butler
This is junk, all discredited. Wall Street had NOTHING to do with Hitler. I may address when I return to the air next week. I said MAY. Remember Migchels said there was usury in the Third Reich, I proved him wrong, Condit would not return for Part 2 of our Debate after I discredited his sources, specifically the one he rested his case on who he said was with Hitler in Vienna in 1938, who I proved had left Germany for London in 1935 and who was a British Agent. Wall Street had a vested interest in Hitler and the NSDAP NOT coming to power.
Merry Christmas!! :) http://youtu.be/JK2p8SNIqEo
Sutton, with Welch, Skousen, Ward, Allen, Smoot, worked for the JBS, a goyim layer of defense for the jews. AJ said Allen Jr went over to the "dark side", ie. ZOG and Politico. What a joke. Look at photos of Allen jr, a sephardic mamzer (Sutton himself was a miscegenist).
"None dare Call It Conspiracy":
"One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is that the Rothschilds were Jewish. Anti-Semites have played into the hands of the conspiracy by trying to portray the entire conspiracy as Jewish. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The traditionally Anglo-Saxon J. P. Morgan and Rockefeller international banking institutions have played a key role in the conspiracy."
Jews already controlled the Communists and Capitalists so why would they need to create a 3rd Front like Hitler to enslave Germany or Europe?
Hitler was an independent 3rd Force that rose up to fight the already existing 2 controlled opposition forces (Communism vs Capitalism).
Hitler told the truth to the common masses about HOW the Jews lie using The Big Lie Propaganda Technique.
It makes no sense whatsoever that Wall Street/ Rothschild would finance anyone to destroy their own system. They financed the Bolsheviks. The National Socialists were NOT financed by anyone, they created their own money based on value not debt. And as far as Israel is concerned, they could have made anything up as there story about the holohoax is another absurdity. The jew knows that he's detested and the greatest insult anyone can have is to be called a jew so that's what he does to others like accusing Hitler of being one.
Post a Comment