16 minutes in, Charlie made a reference to what strongly can be inferred as comments that myself and Rodney Martin made on Mami's, when he started off saying "I don't go frickin' checking out blog sites, I don't waste my time on that slop."
He mentioned that a few weeks ago, a listener emailed him a link to comments about Martin Luther, saying someone was saying that Luther was a great man of God (not something I said -- I was challenging the attack on Luther's sincerity about Jews and his religious convictions -- but I agree with Rodney that it seems Luther wasn't some phony).
Original comments: http://grizzom.blogspot.ca/2015/01/truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani_22.html
He went on to mention the 95 Theses, which is what I raised, when I said what particular problems does Charlie have with any of the points made in them, and Charlie admitted that he didn't have any specific concerns, and he used that to say of course there were legitimate criticisms of the RCC, but that it was set up that way (by those ever-present Jewish supremacists, according to him).
But unlike the case with Paul, where he alleged that there was some poison put into the teachings, you should expect to find some poison with Luther's 95 Theses, and Charlie hasn't cited a single one.
And which of the 95 Theses didn't apply to problems with the RCC and the Pope from early on? It's not just a case of what Charlie says of the corruption being made out to be that way in order to present Luther as a phony alternative.
And beyond him mentioning Luther allegedly posing with a form of the devil's claw, which he says Newton and Nostradamus and many others from the medieval era and later did, the only evidence I've heard him cite for Luther being a Jewish supremacist agent is that he was a Rosicrucian (George Washington was a Mason, but did that make him bad, and are all Rosicrucians bad, or is it like Albert Pike said about Masons, that it's a fraternity within a fraternity? -- I say it is, so further evidence is required to say that Luther was subversive), and that Luther made over-the-top statements about Jews. He did, but as Charlie himself admitted in this show, people were more aware of the Jewish influence then, and what evidence is there that Luther wasn't sincere in his hatred of Jews?
I hope Charlie will cite more evidence, as his great evidence for most of his claims about Christianity could be made out to be similarly lacking in rigour. And I know that some Christians who have commented on here don't regard Giuliani's claims with much consideration, but they can be backed up well, unlike a lot of his recent claims about Jewish supremacists being behind nearly everything, including Japanese ninjas and the destruction of several ancient American civilizations.
Asking for more evidence for the claim of essentially saying that the Protestant reformation was a Jewish supremacist creation is a "petty criticism", anonymous commenter?
You're not much of an alternative thinker, are you?
The Protestant 'Reformation' was instigated by displaced Spanish Jews who had made their way into the Low Countries. It's purpose was an attack on Christendom by dividing it. A typical Jewish tactic.
Thanks, MaryC. That's something at least. Perhaps Charlie didn't talk about the whole issue at all in the past. I did mention in one of those two comment threads that for sure some Jews were supporting the rift after it got started by Luther.
But I am still waiting for specific evidence about Luther being a Jewish supremacist creation, which is the basis for me putting it in the overall context of the Protestant Reformation allegedly being their doing, since he got it started.
6 comments:
16 minutes in, Charlie made a reference to what strongly can be inferred as comments that myself and Rodney Martin made on Mami's, when he started off saying "I don't go frickin' checking out blog sites, I don't waste my time on that slop."
He mentioned that a few weeks ago, a listener emailed him a link to comments about Martin Luther, saying someone was saying that Luther was a great man of God (not something I said -- I was challenging the attack on Luther's sincerity about Jews and his religious convictions -- but I agree with Rodney that it seems Luther wasn't some phony).
Original comments: http://grizzom.blogspot.ca/2015/01/truth-hertz-with-charles-giuliani_22.html
He went on to mention the 95 Theses, which is what I raised, when I said what particular problems does Charlie have with any of the points made in them, and Charlie admitted that he didn't have any specific concerns, and he used that to say of course there were legitimate criticisms of the RCC, but that it was set up that way (by those ever-present Jewish supremacists, according to him).
But unlike the case with Paul, where he alleged that there was some poison put into the teachings, you should expect to find some poison with Luther's 95 Theses, and Charlie hasn't cited a single one.
And which of the 95 Theses didn't apply to problems with the RCC and the Pope from early on? It's not just a case of what Charlie says of the corruption being made out to be that way in order to present Luther as a phony alternative.
And beyond him mentioning Luther allegedly posing with a form of the devil's claw, which he says Newton and Nostradamus and many others from the medieval era and later did, the only evidence I've heard him cite for Luther being a Jewish supremacist agent is that he was a Rosicrucian (George Washington was a Mason, but did that make him bad, and are all Rosicrucians bad, or is it like Albert Pike said about Masons, that it's a fraternity within a fraternity? -- I say it is, so further evidence is required to say that Luther was subversive), and that Luther made over-the-top statements about Jews. He did, but as Charlie himself admitted in this show, people were more aware of the Jewish influence then, and what evidence is there that Luther wasn't sincere in his hatred of Jews?
I hope Charlie will cite more evidence, as his great evidence for most of his claims about Christianity could be made out to be similarly lacking in rigour. And I know that some Christians who have commented on here don't regard Giuliani's claims with much consideration, but they can be backed up well, unlike a lot of his recent claims about Jewish supremacists being behind nearly everything, including Japanese ninjas and the destruction of several ancient American civilizations.
Here was another thread where the comments of myself and Rodney were made, in direct response to Charlie mentioning Luther on this show as well.
http://grizzom.blogspot.ca/2015/02/valkyrie-underground-20150209.html
Charlie is too smart. He is better off ignoring petty criticisms and just keep moving on...
Asking for more evidence for the claim of essentially saying that the Protestant reformation was a Jewish supremacist creation is a "petty criticism", anonymous commenter?
You're not much of an alternative thinker, are you?
The Protestant 'Reformation' was instigated by displaced Spanish Jews who had made their way into the Low Countries. It's purpose was an attack on Christendom by dividing it. A typical Jewish tactic.
Thanks, MaryC. That's something at least. Perhaps Charlie didn't talk about the whole issue at all in the past. I did mention in one of those two comment threads that for sure some Jews were supporting the rift after it got started by Luther.
But I am still waiting for specific evidence about Luther being a Jewish supremacist creation, which is the basis for me putting it in the overall context of the Protestant Reformation allegedly being their doing, since he got it started.
Post a Comment