John B is joined by David McGowan, who gives a painstakingly detailed tour through the dubious photographs, 'victims' and witnesses that appeared on that fateful day. Parts of the video are actually humorous because of the ludicrous nature and blatant fakery in this 'event'.
Thanks to Amanda for bringing this to my attention.
Download Audio Only
9 comments:
It seems as though there are color coordinated 'teams' at work here: red, blue, black and gray. Also, it's amazing how many muscle bound guys with 'high and tight' military haircuts descend upon the scene. Guys in full camouflage outfits magically show up within seconds as well.
The same thing happened to me on 9/11. I was hanging out at a local coffee shop where there was a TV showing the 'event' in real time. I started questioning out loud what we were being told, and some goofball ex-military jarhead started arguing with me and then threatened to kick my ass, yet it was me who got kicked out of the coffee shop, not him - lol. Amerikwans are some of the stupidest people on the planet and love their illusions like no one else. Our controllers count on our stupidity and the shabbily constructed narrative and 'evidence' of the Bostoon Bhombing™ is proof positive of this assertion,
@The_Mad_Subtitler said...
"They would never use children!" Quite fascinating attempting to interact with a brainwashed tube head. I almost got my ass kicked."
Has he never heard of child actors used in the cinema?
And with today's technology, ALL of these child actors can be given not just new identities with completely made-up family and friends to act in the film and then simply go back to their original names or into a witness protection program somewhere with big chunk of money, BUT they can even have their faces morphed ON MOVING VIDEO as well as on still images with CGI so that they'll never even have to answer the question: "Hey you really look like this or that guy." Not that this would ever be a hard question to answer. If somebody tell them they look like one of the Sandy Hook or Boston Bombing "victims," they simply deny it and say I'm not that guy or gal. End of story. However, it's a lot easier to fake a dead victim's identity completely from scratch, than have an actor play him or her leading up to the PsyOp. And it's VERY RISKY and completely unnecessary to run these PsyOps "live in one take." Most of the time, they should it ahead of time, using as many takes as they need and as much editing time as they need, then simply air it as "live" using full media complicity and co-operation from the top TV News anchors.
"They" he assumes are his "friends," and looking out for his best interests, does he? lol
Psychologically speaking, these newscasters are almost a part of his family since he brings them into his house every single day. It's like telling him, although not in those same exact words, that a member of his family is a lying scumbag of a magnitude unimaginable to him. The Big Lie technique that Uncle Adolf identified for all time as the ultimate strategy of the masters of "the Lie," the Jews," at work.
Simon Shack has told the story more than once how a big Norwegian friend of his, who apparently worked in the so-called "space program" no less, got so offended by the things Shack told him about what a gigantic fraud NASA is, that he attacked him after Christmas dinner and tried to choke him to death.
(continued. . .)
All people have to do to show how fake the 9-11 "victims" are is to examine the case of Bob McIlvaine, the well-known boo-hoo-hoo-on-cue "9-11 victim parent" who tours the world claiming his son died on 9-11, but only has these obviously shopped images of his "son" available as proof of his existence on all of the internet:
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l137/falladaspooner/Robert%20G%20McIlvaine%201%20FAKE%209-11%20VicSIM_zpsnn9slgph.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l137/falladaspooner/Robert%20G%20McIlvaine%202%20FAKE%209-11%20VicSIM_zpsjnbkz32o.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l137/falladaspooner/Robert%20G%20McIlvaine%203%20FAKE%209-11%20VicSIM_zpsljq1nxi3.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l137/falladaspooner/Robert%20G%20McIlvaine%204%20with%20fiance%20FAKE%209-11%20VicSIM_zps15lemx8j.jpg
Furthermore, his "son's" name is not on the SSDI (Social Security Death Index) nor is it among the only 229 "death certificates" issued, none of which, by the way, even have a last address of residence listed, standard on every other "death certificate."
And yet, Kevin Barrett has McIlvaine on his "Troof Jihad" gatekeeping show and instead of asking him a single tough question, commiserates with him about "his dead son," while McIlvaine says a few anti-Bush-Cheney and anti-Government things suggesting "inside job" to bait all the suckers in for the hook, the same CON that the even bigger liar Willie Rodriguez, who never was a "janitor" anywhere but in James Randi's toilet, pulls regularly.
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/search?q=+barrett+mcilvaine
http://www.letsrollforums.com/forum/forum/the-u-s-government-conspiracy-of-9-11/-911-for-the-tired-weary-hustled-masses/the-unofficial-william-rodriguez-unfan-club-free-willy-forum
Correction: They SHOOT it ahead of time, not "should"
Cool. Caravan To Midnight. I love John B. Wells. Thanks so much for posting!!
I don't care about "proving" whether someone is a "paid agent" or not. It is a total waste of time. The Maxim to keep in mind is an old by good one: "Direct agent or useful idiot / useful ego, the result it the same: DIS-information. Once they are dis-informing, the reason why they are dis-informing is moot, they are engaged in shillery. And if they CONTINUE DIS-INFORMING regardless of how much proof they're provided to the contrary, then they become TOTAL SHILLS. Once a person reaches the total shill category, it is best to ignore them completely, like we do people like Alex Jones and Michael Rivero. And if Rense doesn't stop with this Fukushima horse manure, he'll be joining Rivero and Jones soon. Spingola still has a lot of street-cred from her previous work but I, personally, cannot listen to her anymore, and furthermore, cannot in good conscience promote her work whole-heartedly anymore than I can Fetzer's gatekeeping. As for Kevin Barrett, the guy is not even a good shill, he belongs in the Khomeini-&-Che-Guevara-worshipping Mark Glenn and the Ugly Truth category of failed shills. He needs to take some lessons from Fetzer in how to do a proper limited hangout bait-&-hook, asap. But maybe his handlers have put him in charge of a totally different demographic, one of whom is probably also the guy who posts Barrett's silly shows here at Mami's.
Fantastic McGowan show here (although McGowan has yet to apply his Boston and Sandy Hook and Moon Hoax discoveries to 9-11 and until he does, I can not trust him completely), and the host was great too with that Barry White voice. However, Dave is totally wrong about Boston being done "on the fly," as a one-take PsyOp "live" hence why it was "more sloppy" than the military rescue simulations done with actors during training with "plenty of time and takes to get it right." Boston was also pre-manufactured with many takes. If any of those military training simulations were filmed and simply shown as future PsyOps being run "live," there would still be MANY clues that prove they were faked. It is impossible to stage a mistake-free real-life simulation. There are too many variables to get right and the less time you have to shoot the pre-manufactured PsyOp and the bigger the event and the more VICSIMS that need to manufactured, the more variables you will get wrong. Even in the most perfect movie, you will still find many bloopers and mistakes and lacks of continuity, etc., proving that you're watching fantasy and a simulation of reality and not reality itself.
For example. ALL of the following photos of this Japanese woman are fake:
http://www.viralnova.com/time-traveling-photographer/
Although both her, the girl with her (herself at a younger age) and the background, place and scenery are all real.
She has digitally inserted herself into old photos, so that she is standing next to her younger self.
The eye alone would not be able to tell these photos are all shopped. But with a few programs and photo analysis, they are discernable as fake.
Therefore, YOUR EYES ALONE, are no longer reliable to judge real or faked imagery. You cannot believe your "lying eyes" anymore, the only thing you can believe is the the correct process of reason and logic based on the correct base premise that technology has simply advanced to the point where your naked eyes are not enough anymore to evaluate imagery.
Dave McGowan has recently announced that he has incurable small-cell lung cancer.... Only the good die young - the evil live on and on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khkEpKM93k8
Post a Comment